• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绿色运营:詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系,通过结构化共识方法确定环境可持续性围手术期实践中的研究优先事项。

Greener Operations: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership to define research priorities in environmentally sustainable perioperative practice through a structured consensus approach.

机构信息

Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.

Health Education England North West, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e066622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066622.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066622
PMID:36977540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10069275/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To agree on the 'top 10' research priorities for environmentally sustainable perioperative practice.

DESIGN

Surveys and literature review; final consensus workshop using a nominal group technique.

SETTING

UK-based setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Healthcare professionals, patients, carers and the public.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Initial survey-suggested research questions; interim survey-shortlist of 'indicative' questions (the 20 most frequently nominated by patients, carers and the public, and healthcare professionals); final workshop-ranked research priorities.

RESULTS

Initial survey-1926 suggestions by 296 respondents, refined into 60 indicative questions. Interim survey-325 respondents. Final workshop-21 participants agreed the 'top 10': (1) How can more sustainable reusable equipment safely be used during and around the time of an operation? (2) How can healthcare organisations more sustainably procure (obtain) medicines, equipment and items used during and around the time of an operation? (3) How can healthcare professionals who deliver care during and around the time of an operation be encouraged to adopt sustainable actions in practice? (4) Can more efficient use of operating theatres and associated practices reduce the environmental impact of operations? (5) How can the amount of waste generated during and around the time of an operation be minimised? (6) How do we measure and compare the short-term and long-term environmental impacts of surgical and non-surgical treatments for the same condition? (7) What is the environmental impact of different anaesthetic techniques (eg, different types of general, regional and local anaesthesia) used for the same operation? (8) How should the environmental impact of an operation be weighed against its clinical outcomes and financial costs? (9) How can environmental sustainability be incorporated into the organisational management of operating theatres? (10) What are the most sustainable forms of effective infection prevention and control used around the time of an operation (eg, personal protective equipment, drapes, clean air ventilation)?

CONCLUSIONS

A broad range of 'end-users' have identified research priorities for sustainable perioperative care.

摘要

目的

就环境可持续性围手术期实践的“十大”研究重点达成共识。

设计

调查和文献回顾;使用名义群体技术的最终共识研讨会。

地点

英国。

参与者

医疗保健专业人员、患者、护理人员和公众。

结果测量

初步调查建议的研究问题;中期调查-“指示性”问题的简短列表(患者、护理人员和公众以及医疗保健专业人员提名最多的 20 个问题);最终研讨会-排名研究重点。

结果

初步调查-296 名受访者提出了 1926 条建议,精炼为 60 条指示性问题。中期调查-325 名受访者。最终研讨会-21 名参与者同意“十大”:(1)如何在手术期间和周围安全使用更可持续的可重复使用设备?(2)医疗机构如何更可持续地采购(获得)手术期间和周围使用的药品、设备和物品?(3)如何鼓励在手术期间和周围提供护理的医疗保健专业人员在实践中采取可持续行动?(4)手术室及其相关实践的更高效利用是否可以减少手术的环境影响?(5)如何将手术期间和周围产生的废物量最小化?(6)如何衡量和比较同一疾病的手术和非手术治疗的短期和长期环境影响?(7)用于同一手术的不同麻醉技术(例如,不同类型的全身、区域和局部麻醉)的环境影响如何?(8)如何权衡手术的环境影响与其临床结果和财务成本?(9)如何将环境可持续性纳入手术室的组织管理?(10)手术期间使用的最可持续的有效感染预防和控制形式是什么(例如,个人防护设备、手术巾、清洁空气通风)?

结论

广泛的“最终用户”已经确定了可持续围手术期护理的研究重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f9/10254879/07a06062a033/bmjopen-2022-066622f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f9/10254879/07a06062a033/bmjopen-2022-066622f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89f9/10254879/07a06062a033/bmjopen-2022-066622f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Greener Operations: a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership to define research priorities in environmentally sustainable perioperative practice through a structured consensus approach.绿色运营:詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系,通过结构化共识方法确定环境可持续性围手术期实践中的研究优先事项。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e066622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066622.
2
Identifying research priorities in anaesthesia and perioperative care: final report of the joint National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia/James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership.确定麻醉与围手术期护理的研究重点:美国国家学术麻醉研究所/詹姆斯·林德联盟联合研究重点设定合作项目的最终报告
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 16;5(12):e010006. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010006.
3
Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.复杂骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e057198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198.
4
Research priorities for the management of major trauma: an international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.重大创伤管理的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 15;14(5):e083450. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083450.
5
Research priorities for liver glycogen storage disease: An international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.肝糖原贮积病的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项确定合作项目
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020 Mar;43(2):279-289. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12178. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
6
Research priorities in foot and ankle conditions: results of a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.足部和踝关节疾病的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟合作的优先事项设定结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 16;13(5):e070641. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070641.
7
Research priorities for the management of broken bones of the upper limb in people over 50: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.50 岁以上人群上肢骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e030028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030028.
8
Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery.确定心脏外科学术研究重点:成人心脏外科学术重点制定合作研究组的报告。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e038001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038001.
9
Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.妊娠高血压研究重点:英国与詹姆斯林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 14;10(7):e036347. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036347.
10
Identifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting Partnership.确定和优先考虑患有听觉过敏症人群的未解决研究问题:詹姆斯林德联盟听觉过敏优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032178. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032178.

引用本文的文献

1
ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) explanation and elaboration: Guidance and examples to support reporting consensus methods.ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document (ACCORD) 解释和说明:支持报告共识方法的指南和示例。
PLoS Med. 2024 May 6;21(5):e1004390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004390. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Research priorities in regional anaesthesia: an international Delphi study.区域麻醉研究重点:一项国际德尔菲研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 May;132(5):1041-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.01.033. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
3
Environmental sustainability and antimicrobials: an underestimated problem with far-reaching consequences.

本文引用的文献

1
Action guidance for addressing pollution from inhalational anaesthetics.处理吸入性麻醉剂污染问题的行动指南。
Anaesthesia. 2022 Sep;77(9):1023-1029. doi: 10.1111/anae.15785. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
2
Carbon footprint of inhalational and total intravenous anaesthesia for paediatric anaesthesia: a modelling study.吸入麻醉和全静脉麻醉用于小儿麻醉的碳足迹:模型研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2022 Aug;129(2):231-243. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.04.022. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
3
Research priorities for the management of complex fractures: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.
环境可持续性与抗菌药物:一个被低估却影响深远的问题。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Mar;50(3):453-456. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07319-5. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
4
ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi.ACCORD(准确共识报告文件):通过改良 Delphi 法制定的生物医学共识方法报告指南。
PLoS Med. 2024 Jan 23;21(1):e1004326. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004326. eCollection 2024 Jan.
复杂骨折管理的研究重点:英国与詹姆斯·林德联盟的优先事项设定伙伴关系。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):e057198. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057198.
4
Principles of environmentally-sustainable anaesthesia: a global consensus statement from the World Federation of Societies of Anaesthesiologists.环境可持续性麻醉原则:世界麻醉医师学会联合会全球共识声明。
Anaesthesia. 2022 Feb;77(2):201-212. doi: 10.1111/anae.15598. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
5
Net zero healthcare: a call for clinician action.实现医疗保健净零排放:临床医生的行动呼吁。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 20;374:n1323. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1323.
6
Operating in a Climate Crisis: A State-of-the-Science Review of Life Cycle Assessment within Surgical and Anesthetic Care.在气候危机下运作:手术和麻醉护理中的生命周期评估科学综述。
Environ Health Perspect. 2021 Jul;129(7):76001. doi: 10.1289/EHP8666. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
7
Common hand and wrist conditions: creation of UK research priorities defined by a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.常见手部和腕部疾病:由詹姆斯林德联盟优先事项制定伙伴关系确定的英国研究重点制定。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 26;11(3):e044207. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044207.
8
The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises.《柳叶刀》健康与气候变化倒计时2020年报告:应对多重危机
Lancet. 2021 Jan 9;397(10269):129-170. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32290-X. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
9
Identifying research priorities in cardiac surgery: a report from the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership in adult heart surgery.确定心脏外科学术研究重点:成人心脏外科学术重点制定合作研究组的报告。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 3;10(9):e038001. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038001.
10
Environmental sustainability in anaesthesia and critical care.麻醉与危重病医学中的环境可持续性。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Nov;125(5):680-692. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.055. Epub 2020 Aug 12.