Tejavibulya Link, Horien Corey, Fredericks Carolyn, Ficek Bronte, Westwater Margaret L, Scheinost Dustin
Interdepartmental Neuroscience Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
MD/PhD Program, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
eNeuro. 2025 Jul 9;12(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0580-24.2025. Print 2025 Jul.
Humans exhibit laterality preferences, with handedness being the most extensively studied. Accordingly, brain-handedness associations are well documented. However, laterality preferences extend beyond handedness to include other limbs, such as footedness and eyedness. Despite these distinctions, brain-footedness and brain-eyedness associations using resting-state functional connectomes remain largely unexplored. We utilize two large datasets, the Human Connectome Project-Development (HCP-D) and Human Connectome Project-Aging (HCP-A), to study the associations between sidedness (i.e., handedness, footedness, and eyedness) and whole-brain functional connectomes. While hand and foot preferences were correlated significantly, they explained <40% of the variance, suggesting some distinctions between measures. For both cohorts, significant associations between handedness connectivity were observed [ < 0.05, network-based statistics (NBS) corrected]. Notable patterns include increased connectivity for left-handedness in the posterior temporal areas and right-handedness in cerebellar regions. In contrast, significant associations between footedness and handedness connectivity were observed only in the HCP-A ( < 0.05, NBS corrected) and not the HCP-D. No significant associations between eyedness and connectivity were observed for either group. Finally, we compared the effect size between brain-handedness and brain-footedness associations. A greater difference was found in the HCP-D. The two cohorts primarily differed in edge distribution in the prefrontal lobe, temporal lobe, and cerebellum. Overall, in adults, brain-handedness and brain-footedness associations were similar. However, in children to adolescents, brain-handedness and brain-footedness associations diverge, suggesting a developmental shift. Characterizing sidedness associations with whole-brain connectomes may provide important insights into understanding the motor and visual systems, rehabilitation and occupational therapy, and benchmarking normative variations in the connectome.
人类表现出偏侧性偏好,其中利手是研究最为广泛的。相应地,大脑与利手之间的关联已有充分记录。然而,偏侧性偏好不仅限于利手,还包括其他肢体,如利足和利眼。尽管存在这些差异,但利用静息态功能连接组对大脑与利足、大脑与利眼之间的关联研究仍基本未被探索。我们利用两个大型数据集,即人类连接组计划-发育(HCP-D)和人类连接组计划-衰老(HCP-A),来研究利侧性(即利手、利足和利眼)与全脑功能连接组之间的关联。虽然手偏好和足偏好显著相关,但它们解释的方差不到40%,这表明不同测量方法之间存在一些差异。对于这两个队列,均观察到利手连接性之间存在显著关联[P < 0.05,基于网络的统计(NBS)校正]。显著模式包括颞叶后部区域左利手的连接性增加以及小脑区域右利手的连接性增加。相比之下,仅在HCP-A中观察到利足与利手连接性之间存在显著关联(P < 0.05,NBS校正),而在HCP-D中未观察到。两组中均未观察到利眼与连接性之间存在显著关联。最后,我们比较了大脑与利手和大脑与利足关联之间的效应大小。在HCP-D中发现了更大的差异。这两个队列主要在前额叶、颞叶和小脑的边缘分布上存在差异。总体而言,在成年人中,大脑与利手和大脑与利足的关联相似。然而,在儿童到青少年阶段,大脑与利手和大脑与利足的关联出现分歧,这表明存在发育转变。描绘利侧性与全脑连接组之间的关联可能为理解运动和视觉系统、康复和职业治疗以及连接组中规范变异的基准测试提供重要见解。