Bussiman Fernando, Lourenco Daniela, Hidalgo Jorge, Chen Ching-Yi, Holl Justin, Misztal Ignacy, Vitezica Zulma G
Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.
Genus Pig Improvement Company, Hendersonville, TN, 37075, USA.
Genet Sel Evol. 2025 Jun 5;57(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s12711-025-00974-2.
In traditional genetic prediction models, environments are typically treated as uncorrelated effects, either fixed or random. Environments can be correlated when they share the same location, management practices, or climate conditions. The temperature-humidity index (THI) is often used to address environmental effects related to climate or heat stress. However, it does not fully describe the complete climate profile of a specific location. Therefore, it is more appropriate to use multiple environmental covariates (ECs), when available, to describe the weather in a specific environment. This raises the question of whether publicly available weather information (such as NASA POWER) is useful for genomic predictions. Genotype-by-environment interaction (GxE) can be modeled using multiple-trait models or reaction norms. However, the former requires a substantial number of records per environment, while the latter can result in over-parametrized models when the number of ECs is large. This study investigated whether using ECs is a suitable strategy to correlate environments (herds) and to model GxE in the genomic prediction of purebred pigs for production traits.
We evaluated different models to account for environmental effects and GxE. When environments were correlated based on ECs, we observed an increase in environmental variance, which was accompanied by an increase in phenotypic variance and a decrease in heritability. Furthermore, including environments as an uncorrelated random effect yielded the same accuracy of estimated breeding values as treating them as correlated based on weather information. All the tested models exhibited the same bias, but the predictions from the multiple-trait models were under-dispersed. Evidence of GxE was observed for both traits; however, there were more genetically unconnected environments for backfat thickness than for average daily gain.
Using outdoor weather information to correlate environments and model GxE offers limited advantages for genomic predictions in pigs. Although it adds complexity to the model and increases computing time without improving accuracy, it does enhance model fit. Including environment information (e.g. herd effect) as an uncorrelated random effect in the model could help address GxE and environmental effects.
在传统的遗传预测模型中,环境通常被视为不相关的效应,要么是固定效应,要么是随机效应。当环境共享相同的地理位置、管理方式或气候条件时,它们可能是相关的。温度湿度指数(THI)通常用于处理与气候或热应激相关的环境效应。然而,它并不能完全描述特定地点的完整气候概况。因此,在可行的情况下,使用多个环境协变量(ECs)来描述特定环境中的天气更为合适。这就引出了一个问题,即公开可用的天气信息(如美国国家航空航天局的POWER数据)是否对基因组预测有用。基因型与环境互作(GxE)可以使用多性状模型或反应规范进行建模。然而,前者每个环境需要大量记录,而当ECs数量较多时,后者可能导致模型参数过多。本研究调查了在纯种猪生产性状的基因组预测中,使用ECs是否是关联环境(猪群)和建模GxE的合适策略。
我们评估了不同的模型来解释环境效应和GxE。当基于ECs使环境相关时,我们观察到环境方差增加,同时表型方差增加,遗传力降低。此外,将环境作为不相关的随机效应纳入模型,与基于天气信息将其视为相关时,估计育种值的准确性相同。所有测试模型均表现出相同的偏差,但多性状模型的预测离散度不足。两个性状均观察到GxE的证据;然而,对于背膘厚度,遗传上不相关的环境比平均日增重更多。
利用室外天气信息关联环境和建模GxE对猪的基因组预测优势有限。虽然这增加了模型的复杂性并增加了计算时间,却未提高准确性,但确实增强了模型拟合度。在模型中纳入环境信息(如猪群效应)作为不相关的随机效应有助于解决GxE和环境效应。