Ma Wenjuan, Zhao Dongmei, Li Pengcheng, Liu Li, Yang Mingpeng, Zhang Jian, Li Jian
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, People's Republic of China.
West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, No.37, Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, 610041, People's Republic of China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jun 6;26(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08665-1.
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is frequently associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain, necessitating effective analgesic strategies to enhance patient comfort and facilitate recovery. Identifying effective pain management methods after ACLR is crucial. This study aims to explore the best analgesia method with the local infiltration analgesia (LIA) and femoral nerve block (FNB) after ACLR. METHODS: Cochrane Library databases, PubMed, MEDLINE and Embase were searched from inception to April 2024 with the following terms: "anterior cruciate ligament" AND "reconstruction" AND "femoral nerve block" AND "local infiltration analgesia" AND "pain score" AND "morphine consumption" AND "analgesia duration" AND "complication". RESULTS: A total of 8 Level 1 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in Meta analysis. The pain score of the FNB group was significantly lower than that of the LIA group at 8 to 12 h after the operation (MD = 1.78; 95% CI, [0.53, 3.03]; P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in pain scores between the two groups at 0 to 4, 4 to 8, and 12 to 24 h postoperatively. Within 24 h after surgery, there was no significant difference in intravenous morphine equivalent consumption between the two groups (MD = 3.76; 95% CI, [-0.82, 8.33]; P = 0.11). In terms of analgesic duration, there was also no significant difference between the two groups (MD = -3.03; 95% CI, [-7.34, 1.28]; P = 0.17). However, the incidence of nausea in the LIA group was higher than that in the FNB group (OR = 2.06; 95% CI, [1.03, 4.14]; P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The FNB is superior to LIA for intraoperative control of postoperative pain in the first 8 to 12 h after ACLR. But there was no significant difference in pain control at other time points, morphine consumption, and analgesic duration between the two groups within 24 h after surgery. The LIA group had a higher incidence of nausea within 24 h after surgery.
背景:前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)术后常伴有中度至重度疼痛,因此需要有效的镇痛策略来提高患者舒适度并促进康复。确定ACLR术后有效的疼痛管理方法至关重要。本研究旨在探讨ACLR术后局部浸润麻醉(LIA)和股神经阻滞(FNB)的最佳镇痛方法。 方法:检索Cochrane图书馆数据库、PubMed、MEDLINE和Embase,检索时间从建库至2024年4月,检索词如下:“前交叉韧带”、“重建”、“股神经阻滞”、“局部浸润麻醉”、“疼痛评分”、“吗啡用量”、“镇痛持续时间”、“并发症”。 结果:Meta分析共纳入8项1级随机对照试验(RCT)。术后8至12小时,FNB组的疼痛评分显著低于LIA组(MD = 1.78;95%CI,[0.53, 3.03];P = 0.005)。术后0至4小时、4至8小时和12至24小时,两组疼痛评分无显著差异。术后24小时内,两组静脉注射吗啡等效用量无显著差异(MD = 3.76;95%CI,[-0.82, 8.33];P = 0.11)。在镇痛持续时间方面,两组之间也无显著差异(MD = -3.03;95%CI,[-7.34, 1.28];P = 0.17)。然而,LIA组恶心发生率高于FNB组(OR = 2.06;95%CI,[1.03, 4.14];P = 0.04)。 结论:ACLR术后前8至12小时,FNB在控制术后疼痛方面优于LIA。但术后24小时内,两组在其他时间点的疼痛控制、吗啡用量和镇痛持续时间方面无显著差异。LIA组术后24小时内恶心发生率较高。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-13