• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分层社会医疗保险下肺癌患者住院治疗及费用的差异:一项基于中国人群的研究

Disparities in inpatient treatment and expenditures among lung cancer patients under tiered social health insurance: a population-based study in China.

作者信息

Zhang Yaoyun, He Yu, Wang Qing, Meng Ying, Xia Xinxin, Ji Xiaokang, Zhao Qingbo, Wang Yongchao, Zhao Yifu, Lv Chao, Zhu Liming, Wang Ding, Ling Suping, Xue Fuzhong, Xu Jin

机构信息

School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.

China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 5;24(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02533-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-025-02533-z
PMID:40474251
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12139372/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Tiered social health insurance (SHI) schemes exist in many countries and may lead to significant disparities of healthcare and financial protection. The degree of cancer care inequalities under tiered SHI in China and other low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain poorly understood.

METHODS

We obtained hospital discharged summary for 319,677 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between 2017 and 2021 in Shandong, China, and established propensity score-matched samples under the Urban and Rural Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URRBMI) and those under the Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance (UEBMI). We ran multivariable regressions to assess the effects of SHI schemes on cancer treatment and expenditures. Subgroup analyses of cancer treatment were conducted based on whether the cancer had metastasized.

RESULTS

In the matched samples, utilization of inpatient cancer care increased under both schemes from 2017 to 2021. Higher proportions of inpatient cancer care utilization were seen in those under UEBMI compared those under URRBMI, consistently with statistical significance. UEBMI was associated with a higher probability of receiving surgery in patients without metastasis, and higher probabilities of receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy in patients with metastasis. Patients under UEBMI were also less likely to be discharged against medical advice than those under URRBMI. Furthermore, UEBMI beneficiaries had 13.3% higher total expenditures but 19.1% lower out-of-pocket expenditures.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant gaps remained in access to inpatient treatment and financial protection for lung cancer, particularly in surgery for non-metastatic cancer. Targeted harmonization of benefit packages is needed to address pressing disparities in cancer care in LMICs with tiered SHI.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12939-025-02533-z.

摘要

引言

许多国家都存在分层社会医疗保险(SHI)计划,这可能导致医疗保健和经济保护方面的显著差异。在中国和其他低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs),分层SHI下的癌症护理不平等程度仍知之甚少。

方法

我们获取了2017年至2021年期间在中国山东省被诊断为肺癌的319,677名患者的医院出院小结,并建立了城乡居民基本医疗保险(URRBMI)参保者和城镇职工基本医疗保险(UEBMI)参保者的倾向得分匹配样本。我们进行了多变量回归分析,以评估SHI计划对癌症治疗和支出的影响。根据癌症是否转移对癌症治疗进行亚组分析。

结果

在匹配样本中,2017年至2021年期间,两种保险计划下的住院癌症护理利用率均有所提高。与URRBMI参保者相比,UEBMI参保者的住院癌症护理利用率更高,且具有统计学意义。UEBMI与未转移患者接受手术的可能性更高以及转移患者接受放疗或化疗、靶向治疗和免疫治疗的可能性更高相关。与URRBMI参保者相比,UEBMI参保者也更不容易违反医嘱出院。此外,UEBMI受益人的总支出高出13.3%,但自付费用低19.1%。

结论

在肺癌住院治疗和经济保护方面仍存在显著差距,尤其是在非转移性癌症的手术治疗方面。需要有针对性地统一福利套餐,以解决分层SHI的LMICs中癌症护理方面的紧迫差异。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12939-025-02533-z获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/12139372/aa57593d4065/12939_2025_2533_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/12139372/dac88e2dca18/12939_2025_2533_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/12139372/aa57593d4065/12939_2025_2533_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/12139372/dac88e2dca18/12939_2025_2533_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ca1/12139372/aa57593d4065/12939_2025_2533_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Disparities in inpatient treatment and expenditures among lung cancer patients under tiered social health insurance: a population-based study in China.分层社会医疗保险下肺癌患者住院治疗及费用的差异:一项基于中国人群的研究
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jun 5;24(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02533-z.
2
Disparities in end-of-life care, expenditures, and place of death by health insurance among cancer patients in China: a population-based, retrospective study.中国癌症患者的医疗保险在临终关怀、支出和死亡地点方面的差异:一项基于人群的回顾性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 4;20(1):1354. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09463-1.
3
Disparities in out-of-pocket inpatient expenditures in rural Shaanxi Province, western China from 2011 to 2014: a time series analysis.2011 年至 2014 年中国西部陕西省农村地区门诊自费支出的差异:时间序列分析。
Trop Med Int Health. 2018 Jun;23(6):661-667. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13060. Epub 2018 May 2.
4
Improving the performance of social health insurance system through increasing outpatient expenditure reimbursement ratio: a quasi-experimental evaluation study from rural China.通过提高门诊支出报销比例来提高社会医疗保险制度绩效:来自中国农村的准实验评估研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 25;17(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0799-8.
5
Social Health Insurance Difference in Inpatient Expenditure and Service Category in China.中国社会医疗保险在住院费用和服务类别方面的差异
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2018 Jan;30(1):56-66. doi: 10.1177/1010539517751745. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Catastrophic health expenditure associated with non-inpatient costs among middle-aged and older individuals in China.中国中老年人群中与非住院费用相关的灾难性卫生支出
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 17;12:1454531. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1454531. eCollection 2024.
7
Disparity in reimbursement for tuberculosis care among different health insurance schemes: evidence from three counties in central China.不同医疗保险计划下结核病治疗报销的差异:来自中国中部三个县的证据。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2016 Jan 27;5:7. doi: 10.1186/s40249-016-0102-4.
8
Trends in disparities in healthcare utilisation between and within health insurances in China between 2008 and 2018: a repeated cross-sectional study.2008 年至 2018 年期间中国医疗保险间和医疗保险内医疗利用差距的变化趋势:一项重复的横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Feb 24;21(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01633-4.
9
Measuring disparities across the distribution of mental health care expenditures.衡量心理健康护理支出分布的差异。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2013 Mar;16(1):3-12.
10
Inpatient care expenditure of the elderly with chronic diseases who use public health insurance: Disparity in their last year of life.慢性病老年患者住院医疗费用:生命最后一年的差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Jun;207:64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.042. Epub 2018 Apr 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Insurance Schemes and Their Influences on Healthcare Variation in Asian Countries: A Realist Review and Theory's Testing in Thailand.亚洲国家的健康保险计划及其对医疗保健差异的影响:泰国的现实主义评价和理论检验。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024;13:7930. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.7930. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
2
Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2022.2022年中国癌症发病率与死亡率
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2024 Feb 2;4(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jncc.2024.01.006. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Health insurance and inequalities in catastrophic health spending in cancer patients. A cross-sectional study in China.
医疗保险与癌症患者灾难性医疗支出的不平等:一项中国的横断面研究
Gac Sanit. 2024;38:102397. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2024.102397. Epub 2024 May 20.
4
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
Association between health insurance cost-sharing and choice of hospital tier for cardiovascular diseases in China: a prospective cohort study.中国心血管疾病医疗保险费用分担与医院层级选择之间的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Feb 14;45:101020. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101020. eCollection 2024 Apr.
6
Disparities in Receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guideline-Adherent Care and Outcomes among Women with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Insurance Type.三阴性乳腺癌女性在接受符合美国国立综合癌症网络指南的治疗及治疗结果方面,因种族/族裔、社会经济地位和保险类型存在的差异。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 26;15(23):5586. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235586.
7
Insurance status impacts survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after liver resection.保险状况影响肝癌患者肝切除术后的生存。
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):17037-17046. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6339. Epub 2023 Jul 16.
8
Association of public health insurance with cancer-specific mortality risk among patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective cohort study in China.公共医疗保险与中国鼻咽癌患者癌症特异性死亡率风险的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;11:1020828. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1020828. eCollection 2023.
9
Disparities in Lung Cancer: A Targeted Literature Review Examining Lung Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival Outcomes in the United States.肺癌的差异:一项针对美国肺癌筛查、诊断、治疗和生存结果的目标文献综述。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jun;11(3):1489-1500. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01625-2. Epub 2023 May 19.
10
Estimates and Projections of the Global Economic Cost of 29 Cancers in 204 Countries and Territories From 2020 to 2050.2020 年至 2050 年全球 29 种癌症在 204 个国家和地区的全球经济成本估计和预测。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):465-472. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7826.