Hardie Claire M, Wade Ryckie G, Wormald Justin C R, Stafford Brian, Elliott Faye, Newton-Bishop Julia, Dewar Donald
Leeds Institute of Medical Research University of Leeds Leeds UK.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust Leeds UK.
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Oct 16;1(8):e12026. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12026. eCollection 2023 Oct.
Skin cancer affecting the nail unit is rare but is associated with morbidity, and melanoma has a high mortality rate. The principal treatment is surgical excision and methods can be classified into digit-sparing surgery or amputation. Digit-sparing surgery (wide excision or Mohs surgery) may be safe and effective for malignancies involving the nail unit in comparison to amputation if there is not bony invasion. The objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of different methods of surgical excision for skin cancer involving the nail unit.
Prospective comparative studies (randomized controlled studies, non-randomized controlled studies and prospective observational studies) of surgical excision for skin cancer of the nail unit in all participants were eligible for inclusion. We searched electronic databases, trials registers and conference abstracts. We checked the reference lists of included studies and related systematic reviews for further references to relevant studies, and we contacted experts to enquire if they were aware of any additional relevant trials. We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were overall survival, disease free survival and adverse events/outcomes at 30 days. The secondary outcomes were quality of life outcomes. We planned to use GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence for each outcome.
We did not identify any studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. We have been unable to assess our outcomes of overall survival, disease free survival, adverse events/effects and quality of life.
As we have not identified any studies for inclusion, we are unable to assess the efficacy and safety of different methods of surgical excision for skin cancer involving the nail unit. We suggest that comprehensive cancer registry analysis is required in this field to obtain meaningful data.
影响甲单位的皮肤癌罕见,但与发病率相关,黑色素瘤死亡率高。主要治疗方法是手术切除,方法可分为保留指(趾)手术或截肢。如果没有骨质侵犯,与截肢相比,保留指(趾)手术(广泛切除或莫氏手术)对于累及甲单位的恶性肿瘤可能是安全有效的。目的是评估不同手术切除方法治疗累及甲单位皮肤癌的疗效和安全性。
所有参与者中关于甲单位皮肤癌手术切除的前瞻性比较研究(随机对照研究、非随机对照研究和前瞻性观察研究)均符合纳入标准。我们检索了电子数据库、试验注册库和会议摘要。我们检查了纳入研究的参考文献列表以及相关的系统评价以获取更多相关研究的参考文献,并且我们联系了专家询问他们是否知晓任何其他相关试验。我们采用了Cochrane期望的标准方法程序。主要结局为总生存期、无病生存期和30天的不良事件/结局。次要结局为生活质量结局。我们计划使用GRADE评估每个结局的证据质量。
我们未识别出任何符合本综述纳入标准的研究。我们无法评估总生存期、无病生存期、不良事件/效应和生活质量这些结局。
由于我们未识别出任何纳入研究,我们无法评估不同手术切除方法治疗累及甲单位皮肤癌的疗效和安全性。我们建议该领域需要进行综合癌症登记分析以获得有意义的数据。