Burchett Helen, Stansfield Claire, Macdowall Wendy, Richardson Michelle, Dick Samantha, Dickson Kelly, D'Souza Preethy, Khouja Claire, Kwan Irene, Raine Gary, Sowden Amanda, Sutcliffe Katy, Thomas James
Faculty of Public Health Policy London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine London UK.
EPPI Centre, UCL Social Research Institute University College London London UK.
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2024 Oct 5;2(10):e70003. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70003. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Interactive evidence maps typically visualise characteristics of research evidence, and gaps in evidence, in a particular field.
AIMS MATERIALS & METHODS: Here we present an example of an evidence map on digital drug and alcohol interventions in which the research evidence is supplemented with information about interventions in use (or available for use) in England. We used systematic review methods to identify systematic reviews of intervention effectiveness and an online survey to identify interventions in England.
Eighteen reviews and 40 interventions were included in the online map.
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first map to juxtapose research and practice in this way. By extending evidence maps to include data on service provision, it becomes easier to see whether research and practice are aligned and where gaps in either evidence or practice (or both) exist.
交互式证据图谱通常会可视化特定领域研究证据的特征以及证据缺口。
目的、材料与方法:在此,我们展示一个关于数字药物和酒精干预的证据图谱示例,其中研究证据辅以英格兰正在使用(或可供使用)的干预措施信息。我们采用系统评价方法来识别干预效果的系统评价,并通过在线调查来识别英格兰的干预措施。
在线图谱纳入了18项综述和40项干预措施。
据我们所知,这是首个以这种方式将研究与实践并列呈现的图谱。通过扩展证据图谱以纳入服务提供数据,更容易看出研究与实践是否一致,以及证据或实践(或两者)中的缺口所在。