Scientists' and Policy Professionals' Views on the Translational Pipeline of Human Gene Editing.
作者信息
Cadigan R Jean, Waltz Margaret
机构信息
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2025 Jun;25(6):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2025.2497979. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Scientists' and Policy Professionals' Views on the Translational Pipeline of Human Gene Editing.科学家和政策专业人士对人类基因编辑转化流程的看法。
Am J Bioeth. 2025 Jun;25(6):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2025.2497979. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
2
Optimising Translational Research Opportunities: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Basic and Clinician Scientists' Perspectives of Factors Which Enable or Hinder Translational Research.优化转化研究机会：对基础科学家和临床医生关于促进或阻碍转化研究因素的观点进行系统评价和叙述性综合分析
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 4;11(8):e0160475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160475. eCollection 2016.
3
The stigma of seriousness: views of genome editing scientists and policy professionals on defining serious disease.严肃性的污名：基因组编辑科学家和政策专业人士对严重疾病定义的看法。
J Community Genet. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00808-0.
4
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review of healthcare professionals' knowledge and views, and ethical and legal concerns.直接面向消费者的基因检测：医疗保健专业人员知识和观点的最新系统评价，以及伦理和法律问题。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Dec;30(12):1331-1343. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01205-8. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
5
Health professionals' views on the barriers and enablers to evidence-based practice for acute stroke care: a systematic review.医疗专业人员对急性中风护理循证实践的障碍与促进因素的看法：一项系统综述
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 5;12(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0599-3.
6
Health Professionals' Views on the Use of Conversational Agents for Health Care: Qualitative Descriptive Study.卫生专业人员对使用会话代理进行医疗保健的看法：定性描述性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 25;26:e49387. doi: 10.2196/49387.
7
School health professionals' understanding of culture: a scoping review.学校卫生专业人员对文化的理解：一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 25;15(7):e100689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100689.
8
Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.科学家对公众的认知不足阻碍了他们纠正错误信息的行为意愿。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0287870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287870. eCollection 2023.
9
Human-AI Teaming in Critical Care: A Comparative Analysis of Data Scientists' and Clinicians' Perspectives on AI Augmentation and Automation.重症监护中的人机协作：数据科学家和临床医生对人工智能增强和自动化的观点比较分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 22;26:e50130. doi: 10.2196/50130.
10
Healthcare professionals' knowledge and attitudes of surgical site infection and surveillance: A narrative systematic review.医护人员对手术部位感染及监测的认知和态度：叙事性系统评价。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 May;69:103637. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103637. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
本文引用的文献
1
Building Better Medicine: Translational Justice and the Quest for Equity in US Healthcare.打造更优质的医学：转化正义与美国医疗保健中的公平追求
Am J Bioeth. 2025 Jun;25(6):11-25. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2025.2457713. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
2
Challenging the Boundaries Between Treatment, Prevention, and Enhancement in Human Genome Editing.在人类基因组编辑中挑战治疗、预防和增强之间的界限。
CRISPR J. 2024 Aug;7(4):180-187. doi: 10.1089/crispr.2024.0021. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
The public-private research ecosystem in the genome editing era.基因组编辑时代的公私合作研究生态系统。
iScience. 2024 May 3;27(6):109896. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109896. eCollection 2024 Jun 21.
4
The translational gap for gene therapies in low- and middle-income countries.中低收入国家基因治疗的转化鸿沟。
Sci Transl Med. 2024 May 8;16(746):eadn1902. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adn1902.
5
Four Faces of Fair Subject Selection.公平的受试者选择的四个方面。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Feb;20(2):5-19. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1701731.
Zotero 插件