Schmidt Julia, Kriwy Peter
Institut für Klinische Epidemiologie und Biometrie (IKE-B), Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Josef-Schneider-Straße 2, 97080 Würzburg, Deutschland.
Institut für Soziologie, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Thüringer Weg 9, 09126 Chemnitz, Deutschland.
Pravent Gesundh. 2022;17(4):545-551. doi: 10.1007/s11553-021-00909-x. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
The present study investigated scarcity decision-making by medical laypersons in the treatment of COVID-19 ("Coronavirus Disease 2019") patients.
In the multivariate cluster-corrected regressions, the responses to 1802 case situations of a factorial survey assessed by 181 medical laypersons were evaluated.
Younger patients, men, those with a high chance of recovery, who have their own children and a job in a hospital were given priority by medical laypersons.
Medical laypersons consciously or unconsciously apply social criteria of decision-making when medical resources are scarce, which are inadmissible from a professional medical and ethical point of view. In order to assess acceptance in the general population, this circumstance should be taken into account.
本研究调查了非医学专业人士在治疗2019冠状病毒病（COVID-19）患者时的稀缺资源决策情况。
在多变量聚类校正回归中，评估了181名非医学专业人士对一项析因调查中1802个病例情况的反应。
非医学专业人士优先考虑年轻患者、男性、康复机会大的患者、有自己孩子的患者以及在医院工作的患者。
在医疗资源稀缺时，非医学专业人士会有意或无意地应用社会决策标准，从专业医学和伦理角度来看，这些标准是不可接受的。为了评估普通民众的接受程度，应考虑到这一情况。
