Zgut Edit
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Hague J Rule Law. 2022;14(2-3):287-308. doi: 10.1007/s40803-022-00170-0. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
Hungary and Poland have seen the most widespread erosion of democracy in the European Union since Fidesz and Law and Justice started their authoritarian remaking in 2010 and 2015, respectively. Despite the EU's introduction of various doctrinal innovations, it could not force these regimes to comply with the core values of the EU. While the literature has focused on the formal violation of the rule of law, the links between informal power and the limited constraining role of the EU have remained undertheorized. This article aims to fill the gap by studying the informal exercise power of the Fidesz and PiS governments that helped them to create an uneven political playing field. Connecting the literature on hybrid authoritarian regimes and informality, it will be shown through three main domains how the Hungarian and Polish governments (1) distributed informal political-economic decision-making power informally throughout clientelist corruption, (2) captured the media through loyal oligarchs/allies, and (3) employed electoral clientelism to tilt the electoral playing field in their favor. While the study proposes a theoretical framework related to the Hungarian and Polish examples, it is also a warning for the EU to take the informal exercise of power seriously.
自2010年匈牙利青年民主主义者联盟(Fidesz)和2015年波兰法律与公正党(Law and Justice)分别开启威权重塑以来,匈牙利和波兰经历了欧盟范围内最广泛的民主侵蚀。尽管欧盟引入了各种理论创新,但仍无法迫使这些政权遵守欧盟的核心价值观。虽然文献主要关注对法治的形式上的违反,但非正式权力与欧盟有限的约束作用之间的联系仍未得到充分理论阐释。本文旨在通过研究匈牙利青年民主主义者联盟和法律与公正党政府的非正式权力行使来填补这一空白,正是这种权力行使帮助它们营造了不公平的政治竞争环境。结合关于混合威权政权和非正式性的文献,本文将通过三个主要方面说明匈牙利和波兰政府如何(1)通过庇护主义腐败在非正式层面分配非正式政治经济决策权,(2)通过忠诚的寡头/盟友控制媒体,以及(3)利用选举庇护主义使选举竞争环境向有利于自己的方向倾斜。虽然本研究提出了一个与匈牙利和波兰案例相关的理论框架,但它也是对欧盟的一个警示,即要认真对待非正式权力的行使。