• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过现场居住者行为调查对住院部 COVID-19 的空气传播感染风险进行评估。

Airborne infection risk assessment of COVID-19 in an inpatient department through on-site occupant behavior surveys.

作者信息

Li Jiaxiong, Li Chunying, Tang Haida

机构信息

School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.

Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Macau, 999078, China.

出版信息

J Build Eng. 2022 Jul 1;51:104255. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104255. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104255
PMID:40477585
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8864063/
Abstract

Airborne transmission is a possible infection route of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This investigation focuses on the airborne infection risk of COVID-19 in a nursing unit in an inpatient building in Shenzhen, China. On-site measurements and questionnaire surveys were conducted to obtain the air change rates and occupant trajectories, respectively. The aerosol transport and dose-response models were applied to evaluate the infection risk. The average outdoor air change rate measured in the wards was 1.1 h, which is below the minimum limit of 2.0 h required by ASHRAE 170-2021. Considering the surveyed occupant behavior during one week, the patients and their attendants spent an average of 19.4 h/d and 15.1 h/d, respectively, in the wards, whereas the nurses primarily worked in the nurse station (3.0 h/d) and wards (2.4 h/d). The doctors primarily worked in their offices (2.6 h/d) and wards (1.1 h/d). Assuming one undetected COVID-19 infector emitting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the nursing unit, we calculated the accumulated viral dose and infection probabilities of the occupants. After one week, the cumulative infection risks of the patients and attendants were almost equal (0.002), and were higher than those of the nurses (0.0013) and doctors (0.0004). Proper protection measures, such as reducing the number of attendants, increasing the air change rate, and wearing masks, were found to reduce the infection risk. It should be noted that the reported results are based on several assumptions, such as the speculated virological properties of SARS-CoV-2 and the particular trajectories of occupants. Moreover, only second generations of transmission were taken into consideration, whereas in reality, the week-long exposure may cause third generation of transmission or worse.

摘要

空气传播是2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的一种可能感染途径。本研究聚焦于中国深圳某住院楼护理单元内COVID-19的空气传播感染风险。分别进行了现场测量和问卷调查,以获取换气次数和人员活动轨迹。应用气溶胶传播和剂量反应模型来评估感染风险。病房实测的平均室外换气次数为1.1次/小时,低于美国采暖、制冷与空调工程师协会(ASHRAE)170-2021标准要求的最低限值2.0次/小时。考虑到一周内调查的人员行为,患者及其陪护人员在病房的平均停留时间分别为19.4小时/天和15.1小时/天,而护士主要在护士站(3.0小时/天)和病房(2.4小时/天)工作。医生主要在办公室(2.6小时/天)和病房(1.1小时/天)工作。假设护理单元内有一名未被发现的COVID-19感染者传播严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2),我们计算了人员的累积病毒剂量和感染概率。一周后,患者和陪护人员的累积感染风险几乎相等(0.002),且高于护士(0.0013)和医生(0.0004)。研究发现,采取适当的防护措施,如减少陪护人员数量、增加换气次数和佩戴口罩,可降低感染风险。需要注意的是,报告的结果基于若干假设,如SARS-CoV-2的推测病毒学特性和人员的特定活动轨迹。此外,仅考虑了二代传播,而在现实中,长达一周的暴露可能会导致三代传播或更严重的情况。

相似文献

1
Airborne infection risk assessment of COVID-19 in an inpatient department through on-site occupant behavior surveys.通过现场居住者行为调查对住院部 COVID-19 的空气传播感染风险进行评估。
J Build Eng. 2022 Jul 1;51:104255. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104255. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
2
Study on ventilation rates and assessment of infection risks of COVID-19 in an outpatient building.门诊楼内新冠病毒感染风险评估及通风率研究
J Build Eng. 2021 Oct;42:103090. doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103090. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
3
An estimation of airborne SARS-CoV-2 infection transmission risk in New York City nail salons.纽约市美甲沙龙中空气传播的新冠病毒感染传播风险评估。
Toxicol Ind Health. 2020 Sep;36(9):634-643. doi: 10.1177/0748233720964650. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Tempo-spatial infection risk assessment of airborne virus via CO concentration field monitoring in built environment.通过建筑环境中一氧化碳浓度场监测对空气传播病毒进行时空感染风险评估
Build Environ. 2022 Jun 1;217:109067. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109067. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
5
CO concentration as an indicator of indoor ventilation performance to control airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2.以 CO 浓度作为室内通风性能的指标,以控制 SARS-CoV-2 的空气传播。
J Infect Public Health. 2023 Jul;16(7):1037-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.05.011. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Analytic modeling and risk assessment of aerial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 virus through vaping expirations in shared micro-environments.在共享微环境中通过蒸发气溶胶吸入途径分析 SARS-CoV-2 病毒空气传播的建模与风险评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(55):83020-83044. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20499-1. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
Association between the infection probability of COVID-19 and ventilation rates: An update for SARS-CoV-2 variants.新型冠状病毒肺炎感染概率与通风率之间的关联:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2变异株的最新情况
Build Simul. 2023;16(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s12273-022-0952-6. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
8
Natural ventilation strategy and related issues to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) airborne transmission in a school building.自然通风策略及相关问题以防止 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在学校建筑中的空气传播。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147764. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147764. Epub 2021 May 15.
9
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
10
A guideline to limit indoor airborne transmission of COVID-19.限制 COVID-19 室内空气传播的指南。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 27;118(17). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018995118.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of COVID-19 infection risks through aerosol transmission in supermarkets and small shops.超市和小商店中新冠病毒通过气溶胶传播的感染风险比较。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2022 Jan;76:103424. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103424. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
2
The association between mechanical ventilator compatible bed occupancy and mortality risk in intensive care patients with COVID-19: a national retrospective cohort study.机械通气兼容病床占用与 COVID-19 重症监护患者死亡风险的关联:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2021 Aug 30;19(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02096-0.
3
COVID-19 pandemic and innovation activities in the global airline industry: A review.COVID-19 大流行与全球航空业的创新活动:综述。
Environ Int. 2021 Nov;156:106719. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106719. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
4
Natural ventilation strategy and related issues to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) airborne transmission in a school building.自然通风策略及相关问题以防止 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)在学校建筑中的空气传播。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 1;789:147764. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147764. Epub 2021 May 15.
5
Spatial analysis of COVID-19 and traffic-related air pollution in Los Angeles.洛杉矶新冠病毒肺炎(COVID-19)与交通相关空气污染的空间分析
Environ Int. 2021 Aug;153:106531. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106531. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
6
Dilution-based evaluation of airborne infection risk - Thorough expansion of Wells-Riley model.基于稀释法的空气传播感染风险评估——威尔斯-莱利模型的全面扩展
Build Environ. 2021 May;194:107674. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107674. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
7
Mechanistic transmission modeling of COVID-19 on the cruise ship demonstrates the importance of aerosol transmission.新冠病毒在游轮上的机械传播建模表明了气溶胶传播的重要性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015482118.
8
Exploratory assessment of the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols in hospital facilities and public spaces of a metropolitan center in Brazil.巴西大都市中心医院设施和公共空间中 SARS-CoV-2 气溶胶发生情况的探索性评估。
Environ Res. 2021 Apr;195:110808. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.110808. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
9
Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) of occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater treatment plants.污水处理厂职业暴露于 SARS-CoV-2 的定量微生物风险评估(QMRA)。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 1;763:142989. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142989. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
10
Multi-route transmission potential of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare facilities.医疗机构中 SARS-CoV-2 的多途径传播潜力。
J Hazard Mater. 2021 Jan 15;402:123771. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123771. Epub 2020 Aug 25.