Gherghina Sergiu, Tap Paul, Soare Sorina
Department of Politics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Department of International Studies and Contemporary History, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Acta Polit. 2023;58(3):573-590. doi: 10.1057/s41269-022-00273-4. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
Participatory budgeting gains momentum around the world, and increasing evidence provides mixed results about its effects. Under these circumstances, it is unclear if citizens consider it a source of empowerment and an avenue for effective decision-making in the life of their local community. We know very little about how participants in participatory budgeting perceive the collective empowerment. This article seeks to identify the factors that shape these perceptions about the empowerment potential of participatory budgeting. It focuses on the critical case of Cluj-Napoca and uses 25 semi-structured interviews conducted in October-November 2020 with three categories of participants. Our findings indicate that participants acknowledge the potential for collective empowerment and praise the limited political involvement but identify design issues and resource allocation as weakening the empowerment potential.
参与式预算编制在全球范围内势头渐盛,越来越多的证据表明其效果好坏参半。在这种情况下,尚不清楚公民是否将其视为增强权能的来源以及当地社区生活中有效决策的途径。我们对参与式预算编制的参与者如何看待集体赋权知之甚少。本文旨在确定影响这些对参与式预算编制赋权潜力看法的因素。它聚焦于克卢日-纳波卡这个关键案例,并于2020年10月至11月对三类参与者进行了25次半结构化访谈。我们的研究结果表明,参与者认可集体赋权的潜力,并对有限的政治参与表示赞赏,但指出设计问题和资源分配削弱了赋权潜力。