• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Unpleasant Memories on the Web in Employment Relations: A Ricoeurian Approach.就业关系中网络上的不愉快记忆:一种利科式的方法。
Humanist Manag J. 2022;7(2):347-368. doi: 10.1007/s41463-022-00138-0. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
2
Health educators in the workplace: helping companies respond to the AIDS crisis.职场中的健康教育工作者:帮助企业应对艾滋病危机。
Health Educ Q. 1986 Winter;13(4):395-406. doi: 10.1177/109019818601300410.
3
Ricoeur's narrative philosophy: A source of inspiration in critical hermeneutic health research.里科尔的叙事哲学:批判解释学健康研究的灵感源泉。
Nurs Philos. 2020 Apr;21(2):e12254. doi: 10.1111/nup.12254. Epub 2019 May 14.
4
Exploring Ricoeur's hermeneutic theory of interpretation as a method of analysing research texts.探索利科的解释学解释理论,将其作为一种分析研究文本的方法。
Nurs Inq. 2000 Jun;7(2):112-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2000.00062.x.
5
6
Hermeneutics and narration: a way to deal with qualitative data.诠释学与叙事:一种处理定性数据的方法。
Nurs Inq. 2002 Jun;9(2):114-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2002.00132.x.
7
A Ricoeur-Inspired Approach to Interpret Participant Observations and Interviews.一种受利科启发的方法来解读参与观察和访谈。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2018 Oct 30;5:2333393618807395. doi: 10.1177/2333393618807395. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
8
Nursing researchers' modifications of Ricoeur's hermeneutic phenomenology.护理研究者对利科诠释现象学的修正。
Nurs Inq. 2015 Dec;22(4):348-58. doi: 10.1111/nin.12098. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
9
[Shedding light on Paul Ricœur's notion of solicitude in order to rethink care].
Rech Soins Infirm. 2021 Jul(145):7-21. doi: 10.3917/rsi.145.0007.
10
Reflections of the collaborative care planning as a person-centred practice.协作式护理计划的反思:以患者为中心的实践。
Nurs Philos. 2022 Jul;23(3):e12389. doi: 10.1111/nup.12389. Epub 2022 Mar 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Could You Ever Forget Me? Why People Want to be Forgotten Online.你会永远忘记我吗?为什么人们希望在网络上被遗忘。
J Bus Ethics. 2022;179(1):25-42. doi: 10.1007/s10551-021-04747-x. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
2
Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness.复仇和宽恕的认知系统。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):1-15. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11002160. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
3
Forgiveness results from integrating information about relationship value and exploitation risk.原谅源自于对关系价值和剥削风险信息的整合。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Mar;38(3):345-56. doi: 10.1177/0146167211424582. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
4
The road to forgiveness: a meta-analytic synthesis of its situational and dispositional correlates.宽恕之路:情境和性格相关性的元分析综合
Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;136(5):894-914. doi: 10.1037/a0019993.
5
Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships.亲密关系中的承诺、促进关系的行为和信任。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Nov;77(5):942-66. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.5.942.

就业关系中网络上的不愉快记忆:一种利科式的方法。

Unpleasant Memories on the Web in Employment Relations: A Ricoeurian Approach.

作者信息

Habisch André, Kletz Pierre, Wack Eva

机构信息

Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Auf der Schanz 49, 85049 Ingolstadt, Germany.

Faculty of Management - Mandel Institute of Social Leadership, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O.B. 653, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

Humanist Manag J. 2022;7(2):347-368. doi: 10.1007/s41463-022-00138-0. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1007/s41463-022-00138-0
PMID:40478117
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9607691/
Abstract

Cybervetting has become common practice in personnel decision-making processes of organizations. While it represents a quick and inexpensive way of obtaining additional information on employees and applicants, it gives rise to a variety of legal and ethical concerns. To limit companies' access to personal information, a has been introduced by the European jurisprudence. By discussing the notion of forgetting from the perspective of French hermeneutic philosopher Paul Ricoeur, the present article demonstrates that both, companies and employees, would be harmed if access to online information on applicants and current employees would be denied. Consistent with a Humanistic Management approach that promotes human dignity and flourishing in the workplace, this article proposes guidance for the responsible handling of unpleasant online memories in personnel decision-making processes, thereby following Ricoeur's notion of forgetting as "kept in reserve". Enabling applicants and employees to take a qualified stand on their past is more beneficial to both sides than a right to be forgotten that is questionable in several respects.

摘要

网络审查已成为组织人事决策过程中的常见做法。虽然它是获取有关员工和求职者更多信息的一种快速且廉价的方式,但它引发了各种法律和道德问题。为了限制公司获取个人信息,欧洲判例法引入了一项[此处原文缺失具体内容]。通过从法国诠释学哲学家保罗·利科的遗忘概念角度进行讨论,本文表明,如果拒绝获取有关求职者和在职员工的在线信息,公司和员工都会受到损害。与促进工作场所的人类尊严和繁荣的人本管理方法一致,本文为在人事决策过程中负责任地处理不愉快的在线记忆提出了指导意见,从而遵循利科将遗忘视为“保留备用”的概念。使求职者和员工能够对自己的过去采取有条件的立场,对双方都比在几个方面都存在问题的被遗忘权更有益。