• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

复仇和宽恕的认知系统。

Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124-0751, USA.

出版信息

Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):1-15. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11002160. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1017/S0140525X11002160
PMID:23211191
Abstract

Minimizing the costs that others impose upon oneself and upon those in whom one has a fitness stake, such as kin and allies, is a key adaptive problem for many organisms. Our ancestors regularly faced such adaptive problems (including homicide, bodily harm, theft, mate poaching, cuckoldry, reputational damage, sexual aggression, and the infliction of these costs on one’s offspring, mates, coalition partners, or friends). One solution to this problem is to impose retaliatory costs on an aggressor so that the aggressor and other observers will lower their estimates of the net benefits to be gained from exploiting the retaliator in the future. We posit that humans have an evolved cognitive system that implements this strategy – deterrence – which we conceptualize as a revenge system. The revenge system produces a second adaptive problem: losing downstream gains from the individual on whom retaliatory costs have been imposed. We posit, consequently, a subsidiary computational system designed to restore particular relationships after cost-imposing interactions by inhibiting revenge and motivating behaviors that signal benevolence for the harmdoer. The operation of these systems depends on estimating the risk of future exploitation by the harmdoer and the expected future value of the relationship with the harmdoer. We review empirical evidence regarding the operation of these systems, discuss the causes of cultural and individual differences in their outputs, and sketch their computational architecture.

摘要

将他人强加给自己和自己有利益关系的人(如亲属和盟友)的成本最小化,是许多生物面临的一个关键适应问题。我们的祖先经常面临这样的适应问题(包括杀人、身体伤害、盗窃、配偶抢夺、戴绿帽子、名誉受损、性侵犯以及将这些成本强加给子女、配偶、联盟伙伴或朋友)。解决这个问题的一个方法是对侵略者施加报复性成本,以便侵略者和其他观察者降低他们对未来从报复者身上获得的净收益的估计。我们假设人类有一个进化的认知系统来执行这种策略——威慑,我们将其概念化为复仇系统。复仇系统会产生第二个适应问题:失去因施加报复性成本而遭受损失的个体的下游收益。因此,我们假设存在一个辅助计算系统,旨在通过抑制复仇和激励对伤害者表示善意的行为,在施加成本的互动后恢复特定的关系。这些系统的运作取决于估计伤害者未来剥削的风险和与伤害者的关系的预期未来价值。我们回顾了关于这些系统运作的实证证据,讨论了它们输出的文化和个体差异的原因,并勾勒了它们的计算架构。

相似文献

1
Cognitive systems for revenge and forgiveness.复仇和宽恕的认知系统。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):1-15. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11002160. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
2
Applying the revenge system to the criminal justice system and jury decision-making.将复仇制度应用于刑事司法系统和陪审团决策中。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):34-5. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000581. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
3
Towards a multifaceted understanding of revenge and forgiveness.走向对复仇和宽恕的多方面理解。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):21. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000374. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
4
Revenge without redundancy: functional outcomes do not require discrete adaptations for vengeance or forgiveness.无需冗余的复仇:功能结果不需要为复仇或宽恕进行离散的适应。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):22-3. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000520. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
5
Revenge: an adaptive system for maximizing fitness, or a proximate calculation arising from personality and social-psychological processes?复仇:一种最大化适应性的系统,还是源自人格和社会心理过程的一种近因计算?
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):33-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000441. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
6
The fuzzy reality of perceived harms.感知危害的模糊现实。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):26-7. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000416. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
7
Revenge and forgiveness or betrayal blindness?复仇与宽恕还是背叛的盲目?
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):23-4. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000398. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
8
Revenge and forgiveness in the New South Africa.新南非的复仇与宽恕。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):37-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000453. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
9
An implausible model and evolutionary explanation of the revenge motive.一个关于复仇动机的难以置信的模型和进化解释。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):21-2. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000386. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
10
On the differential mediating role of emotions in revenge and reconciliation.论情绪在复仇和和解中的差异中介作用。
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):27-8. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12000428. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Revenge or collusion? An experiment on payoff subtraction and addition in team contests.报复还是勾结?团队竞赛中收益减法与加法的实验
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 4;20(9):e0331015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331015. eCollection 2025.
2
Discourse Focus and Memory Encoding: The Role of Trial-Level Alpha Power.话语焦点与记忆编码:试验水平阿尔法波功率的作用。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 6:2025.07.05.663298. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.05.663298.
3
Unpleasant Memories on the Web in Employment Relations: A Ricoeurian Approach.就业关系中网络上的不愉快记忆:一种利科式的方法。
Humanist Manag J. 2022;7(2):347-368. doi: 10.1007/s41463-022-00138-0. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
4
The impact of action descriptions on attribution of moral responsibility towards robots.行动描述对机器人道德责任归因的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 3;15(1):4128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79027-5.
5
Russia's attacks on civilians strengthen Ukrainian resistance.俄罗斯对平民的袭击增强了乌克兰的抵抗力量。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Dec 12;2(12):pgad386. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad386. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Punishment: one tool, many uses.惩罚:一种工具,多种用途。
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 Nov 12;1:e12. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.12. eCollection 2019.
7
Political repression motivates anti-government violence.政治镇压引发反政府暴力。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Jun 14;10(6):221227. doi: 10.1098/rsos.221227. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Coalitionality shapes moral elevation: evidence from the U.S. Black Lives Matter protest and counter-protest movements.联盟性塑造道德升华:来自美国“黑人的命也是命”抗议及反抗议运动的证据。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Mar 29;10(3):220990. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220990. eCollection 2023 Mar.
9
Connectome-based predictive modeling of trait forgiveness.基于连接组学的特质宽恕预测建模。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Feb 28;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad002.
10
Key individuals catalyse intergroup violence.关键人物催化群体间暴力。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 May 23;377(1851):20210141. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0141. Epub 2022 Apr 4.