Khanmohammadi Razieh, Mirali Hasan, Mohammadzadeh Hasan, Ebrahimi Safiye, Shaw Ina, Shaw Brandon S
Department of Motor Behavior and Sport Management, Faculty of Sports Sciences, Urmia University, Urmia City, West Azarbaijan Province, Iran.
School of Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex, UK.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 6;15(1):19939. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05024-x.
Schizophrenia significantly impairs daily functioning, requiring innovative, cost-effective treatments beyond standard antipsychotics, and cognitive interventions. This study examined the individual and combined effects of cognitive, music, and aerobic exercise interventions on depression, balance, and mobility in patients with schizophrenia and severe depression. Eighty-four male patients with schizophrenia and severe depression from an inpatient psychiatric centre participated in a 12-week, single-blind, randomised active-controlled trial. Participants were systematically assigned to one of seven equal groups (n = 12 each): aerobic exercise (AerG), cognitive rehabilitation/treatment-as-usual (CogG), music intervention (MusG), aerobic exercise + music intervention (A&MG), aerobic exercise + cognitive intervention (A&CG), cognitive intervention + music intervention (C&MG), and a comprehensive combination of all three modalities (ACMG). Each intervention was delivered over 60 min, three times weekly for 12 weeks. The study employed the Beck Depression Inventory Short Form, Stork Balance Test, and modified Timed Up and Go Test to assess improvements in depression, balance, and mobility. Statistical analyses were conducted using paired t-tests for within-group comparisons and ANCOVA with Bonferroni post hoc tests for between-group differences, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Results showed significant improvements in depression, balance, and mobility across all treatment groups. The CogG group outperformed both AerG and MusG in all outcomes, establishing it as the gold-standard comparator. A&CG yielded greater benefits than other single or dual-modality groups, while the multimodal ACMG group demonstrated the most substantial improvements across all measures. These findings highlight the practical value of incorporating multimodal interventions into standard care to improve both mental health and physical function, offering a scalable, cost-effective approach to addressing the diverse needs of this population of patients with schizophrenia and severe depression. Implementing such interventions in psychiatric care settings could lead to more comprehensive and effective treatment strategies for improving patient outcomes.
精神分裂症严重损害日常功能,需要有超越标准抗精神病药物及认知干预的创新且具成本效益的治疗方法。本研究考察了认知、音乐和有氧运动干预对精神分裂症和重度抑郁症患者的抑郁、平衡能力及活动能力的个体及综合影响。来自一家住院精神科中心的84名患有精神分裂症和重度抑郁症的男性患者参与了一项为期12周的单盲随机活性对照试验。参与者被系统地分配到七个相等的组之一(每组n = 12):有氧运动组(AerG)、认知康复/常规治疗组(CogG)、音乐干预组(MusG)、有氧运动 + 音乐干预组(A&MG)、有氧运动 + 认知干预组(A&CG)、认知干预 + 音乐干预组(C&MG)以及所有三种方式的综合组(ACMG)。每次干预时长60分钟,每周三次,共进行12周。该研究采用贝克抑郁量表简版、鹳平衡测试和改良的计时起立行走测试来评估抑郁、平衡能力和活动能力的改善情况。使用配对t检验进行组内比较,并使用协方差分析及Bonferroni事后检验进行组间差异分析,显著性设定为p≤0.05。结果显示所有治疗组在抑郁、平衡能力和活动能力方面均有显著改善。CogG组在所有结果方面均优于AerG组和MusG组,成为黄金标准对照组。A&CG组比其他单一或双模式组产生了更大的益处,而多模式ACMG组在所有测量指标上都显示出最显著的改善。这些发现凸显了将多模式干预纳入标准护理以改善心理健康和身体功能的实际价值,为满足这类精神分裂症和重度抑郁症患者的多样化需求提供了一种可扩展且具成本效益的方法。在精神科护理环境中实施此类干预可能会带来更全面有效的治疗策略,以改善患者的治疗效果。