• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Integrative analysis of psychosocial, chronotype, and environmental predictors of aggressive behavior in Adolescents: Insights from machine learning.青少年攻击行为的心理社会、昼夜节律和环境预测因素的综合分析:来自机器学习的见解
J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Jun 4;189:91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.06.005.
2
Supervised Machine Learning Models for Predicting Sepsis-Associated Liver Injury in Patients With Sepsis: Development and Validation Study Based on a Multicenter Cohort Study.用于预测脓毒症患者脓毒症相关肝损伤的监督式机器学习模型:基于多中心队列研究的开发与验证研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 26;27:e66733. doi: 10.2196/66733.
3
Machine learning based screening of biomarkers associated with cell death and immunosuppression of multiple life stages sepsis populations.基于机器学习对与多生命阶段脓毒症人群细胞死亡和免疫抑制相关生物标志物的筛选。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14600-0.
4
Application of machine learning algorithms to model predictors of informed contraceptive choice among reproductive age women in six high fertility rate sub Sahara Africa countries.机器学习算法在撒哈拉以南非洲六个高生育率国家的育龄妇女中用于构建知情避孕选择预测模型的应用。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 29;25(1):1986. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23242-w.
5
Development of Machine Learning-based Algorithms to Predict the 2- and 5-year Risk of TKA After Tibial Plateau Fracture Treatment.基于机器学习的算法用于预测胫骨平台骨折治疗后2年和5年全膝关节置换风险的研究进展
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003442.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Machine Learning Model for Predicting Coronary Heart Disease Risk: Development and Validation Using Insights From a Japanese Population-Based Study.预测冠心病风险的机器学习模型:基于日本人群研究的见解进行开发与验证
JMIR Cardio. 2025 May 12;9:e68066. doi: 10.2196/68066.
8
Automated feature learning and survival prognostication in grade 4 glioma using supervised machine learning models.使用监督式机器学习模型对四级胶质瘤进行自动特征学习和生存预后分析。
J Neurooncol. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s11060-025-05099-6.
9
Explainable machine learning prediction of internet addiction among Chinese primary and middle school children and adolescents: a longitudinal study based on positive youth development data (2019-2022).中国中小学生和青少年网络成瘾的可解释机器学习预测:基于积极青少年发展数据的纵向研究(2019 - 2022年)
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;13:1590689. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1590689. eCollection 2025.
10
Prediction of Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Population Using LightGBM and Cohort Validation of Its Clinical Value: Cross-Sectional and Retrospective Cohort Study.使用LightGBM预测非糖尿病人群的胰岛素抵抗及其临床价值的队列验证:横断面和回顾性队列研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 13;13:e72238. doi: 10.2196/72238.

本文引用的文献

1
The influence of chronotype, socioeconomic status, latitude, longitude, and seasonality on cognitive performance and academic outcomes in adolescents.青少年的昼夜节律类型、社会经济地位、纬度、经度和季节性对认知能力及学业成绩的影响。
Sleep Med. 2025 Apr;128:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2025.01.030. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
2
Stress timing, trauma exposure, and family resilience differentially affect internalizing and externalizing symptoms at 3, 5, and 7 years of age.压力发生时间、创伤暴露经历以及家庭复原力对3岁、5岁和7岁儿童内化性和外化性症状的影响存在差异。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Oct 29;2(1):103. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00151-z.
3
Methodological choices and clinical usefulness for machine learning predictions of outcome in Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy.基于互联网的认知行为疗法中机器学习对结果预测的方法选择及临床实用性
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Oct 10;4(1):196. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00626-4.
4
How Do Anger and Impulsivity Impact Fast-Food Consumption in Transitional Age Youth?愤怒和冲动如何影响转型期青年的快餐消费?
AJPM Focus. 2024 Feb 22;3(3):100208. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100208. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Validation of a Korean Version of the Short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale for Children.儿童版韩国语简短UPPS-P冲动行为量表的验证
Psychiatry Investig. 2024 Feb;21(2):208-215. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0277. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
6
The relations between chronotype, stressful life events, and impulsivity in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) study.在青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究中,探讨了时型、生活压力事件和冲动之间的关系。
J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Nov;167:119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.10.030. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
7
"Help Me Control My Impulses!": Adolescent Impulsivity and Its Negative Individual, Family, Peer, and Community Explanatory Factors.“帮我控制冲动!”:青少年冲动及其个体、家庭、同伴和社区的负面解释因素。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Dec;52(12):2545-2558. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01837-z. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
8
The distinction between irritability and anger and their associations with impulsivity and subjective wellbeing.易激惹、愤怒及其与冲动和主观幸福感的关系。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 27;13(1):10398. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37557-4.
9
Aggressive behavior in adolescent: The importance of biopsychosocial predictors among secondary school students.青少年的攻击行为:中学生的生物心理社会预测因素的重要性。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 14;11:992159. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.992159. eCollection 2023.
10
Adverse childhood experiences, mental health, and social functioning: A scoping review of the literature.不良童年经历、心理健康和社会功能:文献综述
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 May;139:106092. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106092. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

青少年攻击行为的心理社会、昼夜节律和环境预测因素的综合分析:来自机器学习的见解

Integrative analysis of psychosocial, chronotype, and environmental predictors of aggressive behavior in Adolescents: Insights from machine learning.

作者信息

Nguyen-Louie Tam, McCarthy Michael J, Coccaro Emil F, Meruelo Alejandro D

机构信息

University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.

University of California, San Diego, VA San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, San Diego, CA, 92161, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2025 Jun 4;189:91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.06.005.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2025.06.005
PMID:40483849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12258394/
Abstract

Aggressive behavior in adolescents and young adults is a significant public health concern associated with adverse educational, social, and mental health outcomes. This study aimed to identify key predictors of aggression using a cross-sectional dataset from a large, longitudinal U.S. cohort. The outcome was self-reported aggressive behavior, and predictors spanned demographic, psychosocial, behavioral, and contextual domains, including adverse life events, impulsivity, family conflict, peer and school environments, and chronotype.Multiple models were evaluated, including linear regression, a hypertuned random forest, a tuned gradient boosting machine (GBM), XGBoost, and an ensemble model combining random forest and GBM predictions. All models were trained using five-fold cross-validation across five multiply imputed datasets. Linear regression achieved the highest predictive accuracy (r = 0.313; MSE = 40.76), followed closely by the random forest (r = 0.311; MSE = 40.71). The ensemble and GBM models showed slightly lower performance. Across models, key predictors included adverse life events, delayed chronotype, peer network health, family cohesion, and normalized household income.These findings underscore the contribution of environmental and psychological stressors to adolescent aggression, particularly the buffering role of cohesive peer and family relationships. Despite similar predictive accuracy across models, machine learning methods offered advantages for variable importance ranking and interaction discovery. Results highlight the utility of integrating diverse psychosocial, behavioral, and contextual measures to better understand complex behavioral outcomes and inform targeted prevention strategies.

摘要

青少年和青年的攻击性行为是一个重大的公共卫生问题,与不良的教育、社会和心理健康结果相关。本研究旨在使用来自美国一个大型纵向队列的横断面数据集,确定攻击行为的关键预测因素。结果是自我报告的攻击行为,预测因素涵盖人口统计学、心理社会、行为和背景领域,包括不良生活事件、冲动性、家庭冲突、同伴和学校环境以及生物钟类型。评估了多个模型,包括线性回归、超参数调整的随机森林、调整后的梯度提升机(GBM)、XGBoost以及结合随机森林和GBM预测的集成模型。所有模型均使用五个多重插补数据集进行五折交叉验证训练。线性回归的预测准确率最高(r = 0.313;均方误差 = 40.76),随机森林紧随其后(r = 0.311;均方误差 = 40.71)。集成模型和GBM模型的表现略低。在所有模型中,关键预测因素包括不良生活事件、延迟的生物钟类型、同伴网络健康、家庭凝聚力和家庭收入标准化。这些发现强调了环境和心理压力源对青少年攻击行为的影响,特别是亲密同伴和家庭关系的缓冲作用。尽管各模型的预测准确率相似,但机器学习方法在变量重要性排序和交互发现方面具有优势。结果突出了整合多种心理社会、行为和背景测量方法的实用性,以更好地理解复杂的行为结果并为有针对性的预防策略提供依据。