Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of the Azores, Ponta Delgada, Portugal.
Cognitive and Behavioural Centre for Research and Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Dec;52(12):2545-2558. doi: 10.1007/s10964-023-01837-z. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
The literature shows that impulsivity, prevalent in adolescence, is negatively linked with a variety of psychosocial factors (e.g., positive interpersonal relationships, emotion regulation); however, there is limited research examining the relative contribution of multiple factors for this trait nor exploring how these factors influence the associations between impulsivity and risk-related outcomes. Drawing on multiple components of the unified theory of development (i.e., psychological variables, peers subsystem, community subsystem, family processes subsystem), this cross-sectional study aims to identify explanatory psychosocial variables (i.e., early memories of warmth and safeness, rational decision-making style, resilience, emotion regulation, coping, parental attachment, social group attachment, satisfaction with school and family-related variables) that are negatively related with impulsivity, in younger (13-15) and older (16-19 years) adolescents, and explore their moderating role in the associations between this trait and some risk-related outcomes (i.e., verbal aggression, anger, self-harm, other high-risk behaviors). A representative sample of 6894 adolescents (52.9% female) living in the Azores (Portugal), with ages ranging from 13 to 19 (M = 15.4), was used. Two stepwise multiple regressions, one for each age group, revealed that only emotion regulation, parental attachment, and social group attachment had a negative effect on impulsivity in both age groups; additionally, satisfaction with teachers also had this effect in younger adolescents. The first three variables weakened the positive associations between impulsivity and the risk-related outcomes. These results suggest that the psychological system and all subsystems of the social context measured play a relevant role in explaining adolescent impulsivity and that it may be reduced by promoting emotion regulation, positive parenting practices, healthier relationships with peers, and healthier relationships with teachers.
文献表明,青少年普遍存在的冲动与多种心理社会因素呈负相关(例如,积极的人际关系、情绪调节);然而,对于这种特质,很少有研究检查多个因素的相对贡献,也没有研究探索这些因素如何影响冲动与风险相关结果之间的关联。本横断面研究借鉴统一发展理论的多个组成部分(即心理变量、同伴子系统、社区子系统、家庭过程子系统),旨在确定与冲动呈负相关的解释性心理社会变量(即温暖和安全感的早期记忆、理性决策风格、韧性、情绪调节、应对方式、父母依恋、社交群体依恋、对学校和家庭相关变量的满意度),这些变量在较年轻(13-15 岁)和较年长(16-19 岁)的青少年中与冲动呈负相关,并探索它们在这种特质与一些风险相关结果(即言语攻击、愤怒、自残、其他高风险行为)之间关联的调节作用。使用了来自亚速尔群岛(葡萄牙)的 6894 名年龄在 13 至 19 岁之间(M=15.4)的青少年的代表性样本。对两个年龄组分别进行了逐步多元回归分析,结果表明,只有情绪调节、父母依恋和社交群体依恋对两个年龄组的冲动都有负面影响;此外,对教师的满意度在较年轻的青少年中也有这种影响。前三个变量减弱了冲动与风险相关结果之间的正相关。这些结果表明,所测量的心理系统和社会环境的所有子系统在解释青少年冲动方面发挥着重要作用,通过促进情绪调节、积极的育儿实践、与同伴建立更健康的关系以及与教师建立更健康的关系,可能会减少冲动。