Riguzzi Marco, Verweij Lotte, Naef Rahel
Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Centre of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Centre of Clinical Nursing Science, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2025 Oct;90:104106. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104106. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
This study aims to demonstrate that family satisfaction with intensive care and decision-making is independent of sociodemographic family member and patient characteristics and the patient outcomes of mortality and length of stay.
Cross-sectional survey data from two independent samples of a total of 233 family members of adult patients treated in six ICUs of a Swiss university hospital were analyzed. The FS-ICU-24 questionnaire was used to measure the satisfaction of family members of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with ICU care and decision-making. Equivalence analysis methodology (TOST) was used to demonstrate the non-existence of moderate or greater associations between family satisfaction and routinely collected sociodemographic family member and patient characteristics and patient outcomes.
The non-existence of such associations between family (age, gender, relationship, education, travel distance, previous ICU experience) or patient characteristics (age, sex, unplanned ICU admission) or outcomes (length of stay, death) and FS-ICU-24 or its subscales was demonstrated (p ≤ 0.003).
Our results show that family satisfaction with ICU care is independent of sociodemographic family member and patient characteristics and patient outcomes that are available from routine documentation. It is highly unlikely that family satisfaction can be meaningfully predicted this way.
Early identification of families at risk of having an unsatisfactory ICU experience is important because (dis)satisfaction with care is a care-related factor for post-ICU anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress. Several studies have failed to demonstrate a relevant association with characteristics from routine documentation. Our study shows that this approach is unlikely to yield useful results. Therefore, it is crucial to focus research on care-related factors and their impact on family (dis)satisfaction and to build capacity for family-centered care in the ICU.
本研究旨在证明家庭对重症监护及决策的满意度独立于社会人口统计学特征的家庭成员和患者特征以及患者的死亡率和住院时间等结局。
对瑞士一家大学医院六个重症监护病房收治的成年患者的233名家庭成员的两个独立样本的横断面调查数据进行分析。使用FS-ICU-2进行问卷调查,以测量重症监护病房(ICU)患者的家庭成员对ICU护理和决策的满意度。采用等效性分析方法(TOST)来证明家庭满意度与常规收集的社会人口统计学特征的家庭成员和患者特征以及患者结局之间不存在中度或更强的关联。
证明了家庭(年龄、性别、关系、教育程度、旅行距离、既往ICU经历)或患者特征(年龄、性别、非计划入住ICU)或结局(住院时间、死亡)与FS-ICU-24或其分量表之间不存在此类关联(p≤0.003)。
我们的结果表明,家庭对ICU护理的满意度独立于社会人口统计学特征的家庭成员和患者特征以及常规记录中的患者结局。通过这种方式有意义地预测家庭满意度的可能性极小。
尽早识别有ICU体验不满意风险的家庭很重要,因为对护理的(不)满意是导致ICU后焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激的护理相关因素。多项研究未能证明与常规记录中的特征存在相关关联。我们的研究表明这种方法不太可能产生有用的结果。因此,关键是将研究重点放在护理相关因素及其对家庭(不)满意的影响上,并在ICU中建立以家庭为中心的护理能力。