• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于中医的紧张型头痛治疗核心结局集的制定:德尔菲共识研究方案

Core Outcome Set Development for Tension-Type Headache Treatment Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: Protocol for a Delphi Consensus Study.

作者信息

Fu Guojing, Chen Yunmeng, Liang Xiao, Guo Chunli, Fan Xueming, Gong Xiao, Chen Wenjie, Teng Jing, Tang Jun, Liao Xing, Wei Jingjing, Zhang Yunling

机构信息

Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 5;14:e63481. doi: 10.2196/63481.

DOI:10.2196/63481
PMID:39909408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11840383/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most common type of headache and the second most common health-related complaint among children and adults. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) offers unique therapeutic benefits in treating TTH. However, the lack of standardized evidence-such as inconsistencies in outcome selection and reporting in clinical studies, a lack of consensus on outcomes and measures, high risks of selective reporting bias, and missing data-has limited the development of robust evidence supporting the efficacy of TCM in treating TTH. Therefore, establishing a core outcome set (COS) is crucial for standardizing TCM clinical studies for TTH, thereby enhancing the quality and comparability of research findings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop a COS for future clinical studies on the treatment of TTH with TCM.

METHODS

The COS will be developed through the following 3 stages. First, systematic reviews and semistructured interviews will be conducted to identify potential essential outcomes, which will be evaluated by the steering committee to finalize a preliminary list of outcomes. Data will be processed using thematic analysis to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant outcomes. Second, a 2-round Delphi survey will be conducted, inviting stakeholders, including health care experts and patients with tension-type headaches, to determine the importance of each outcome. Statistical analysis will be used to assess the level of consensus and prioritize outcomes based on predefined criteria. Third, a face-to-face consensus meeting will be held to finalize the COS and recommend measurement times for each outcome. Key outcomes will be interpreted based on their clinical relevance and feasibility of measurement, ensuring the COS is comprehensive and applicable in clinical settings.

RESULTS

The protocol has been registered in PROSPERO, with the review commencing on October 1, 2024, and anticipated results by November 15, 2024. The systematic reviews will be finalized, followed by the Delphi survey and consensus conference in late 2024 and early 2025. The COS findings will be reported per COS-STAR (Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting) guidelines, published in an international journal, presented at conferences, and disseminated to participants for clinical application.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is necessary as developing a COS for future TCM clinical studies in the treatment of TTH can maximize the value of data from individual trials and provide high-quality research evidence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative 1473; https://tinyurl.com/3ts62s2p.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/63481.

摘要

背景

紧张型头痛(TTH)是最常见的头痛类型,也是儿童和成人中第二常见的与健康相关的主诉。中医在治疗紧张型头痛方面具有独特的治疗优势。然而,缺乏标准化证据,如临床研究中结局选择和报告的不一致、对结局和测量方法缺乏共识、选择性报告偏倚的高风险以及数据缺失,限制了支持中医治疗紧张型头痛疗效的有力证据的发展。因此,建立核心结局集(COS)对于规范中医治疗紧张型头痛的临床研究至关重要,从而提高研究结果的质量和可比性。

目的

本研究旨在为未来中医治疗紧张型头痛的临床研究制定一个核心结局集。

方法

核心结局集将通过以下三个阶段制定。首先,进行系统评价和半结构化访谈以确定潜在的关键结局,由指导委员会对这些结局进行评估,以确定结局的初步清单。将使用主题分析对数据进行处理,以确保全面涵盖相关结局。其次,将进行两轮德尔菲调查,邀请包括医疗保健专家和紧张型头痛患者在内的利益相关者,以确定每个结局的重要性。将使用统计分析来评估共识水平,并根据预定义标准对结局进行优先排序。第三,将举行面对面的共识会议,以最终确定核心结局集,并为每个结局推荐测量时间。将根据关键结局的临床相关性和测量的可行性对其进行解释,确保核心结局集全面且适用于临床环境。

结果

该方案已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)中注册,审查于2024年10月1日开始,预计2024年11月15日得出结果。系统评价将在2024年底完成,随后在2024年底和2025年初进行德尔菲调查和共识会议。核心结局集的结果将按照核心结局集报告标准(COS-STAR)指南进行报告,发表在国际期刊上,在会议上展示,并分发给参与者以供临床应用。

结论

本研究很有必要,因为为未来中医治疗紧张型头痛的临床研究制定核心结局集可以最大限度地提高单个试验数据的价值,并提供高质量的研究证据。

试验注册

有效性试验核心结局测量计划1473;https://tinyurl.com/3ts62s2p。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/63481。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08c7/11840383/b381b5e5b934/resprot_v14i1e63481_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08c7/11840383/b381b5e5b934/resprot_v14i1e63481_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08c7/11840383/b381b5e5b934/resprot_v14i1e63481_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Core Outcome Set Development for Tension-Type Headache Treatment Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: Protocol for a Delphi Consensus Study.基于中医的紧张型头痛治疗核心结局集的制定:德尔菲共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 5;14:e63481. doi: 10.2196/63481.
2
Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol.为轻度认知障碍患者的干预措施制定核心结局集:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e090818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090818.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
5
Aspirin for acute treatment of episodic tension-type headache in adults.阿司匹林用于成人发作性紧张型头痛的急性治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 13;1(1):CD011888. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011888.pub2.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
10
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicines for tension-type headache: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.中成药治疗紧张型头痛的疗效与安全性:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 10;10(13):e32798. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32798. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
2
Development of a core outcome set for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in clinical trials of traditional Chinese medicine: a study protocol.开发用于中药临床试验的高血压性脑出血核心结局集:研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Oct 12;23(1):871. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06801-z.
3
[Systematic review and Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of Toutongning Capsules in treatment of tension-type headache].
[头痛宁胶囊治疗紧张型头痛的疗效与安全性的系统评价和Meta分析]
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2021 Sep;46(18):4623-4632. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20210520.501.
4
[Systematic review and Meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of gastrodin in treatment of tension-type headache].天麻素治疗紧张型头痛的疗效与安全性的系统评价和Meta分析
Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2021 Sep;46(18):4615-4622. doi: 10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20210615.501.
5
Developing a core outcome set on traditional Chinese medicine (COS-TCM) for chronic heart failure (CHF): a study protocol.制定基于传统中医(COS-TCM)的慢性心力衰竭(CHF)核心结局集:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 2;11(7):e047148. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047148.
6
Development of a Core Outcome Set for the Benefits and Adverse Events of Acute Heart Failure in Clinical Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine: A Study Protocol.中西医结合治疗急性心力衰竭临床试验中获益与不良事件核心结局集的制定:一项研究方案
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 May 7;8:677068. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.677068. eCollection 2021.
7
The Effectiveness of Acupuncture on Headache Intensity and Frequency in Patients With Tension-Type Headache: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针刺对紧张型头痛患者头痛强度和频率的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2021 Apr 1;13(4):e14237. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14237.
8
Tension-type headache.紧张型头痛。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Mar 25;7(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00257-2.
9
The effectiveness and safety of Tuina for tension-type headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis.推拿治疗紧张型头痛的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2021 May;43:101293. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101293. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
10
Identifying Outcome Measures for Migraine Value-Based Contracting Using the Delphi Method.采用德尔菲法确定偏头痛基于价值的合同的结果衡量指标。
Headache. 2020 Nov;60(10):2139-2151. doi: 10.1111/head.13978. Epub 2020 Sep 30.