Wu Chengliang, Zhang Shuai, Wu Tao, Jia Sheng-Wei, Chu Zhaowei, Yang Fan
Department of Sports Rehabilitation, School of Sports Medicine, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China.
Biomechanics Laboratory, Li Ning Sports Science Research Center (LN-SSRC), Beijing, China.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 May 23;13:1560522. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1560522. eCollection 2025.
Ankle sprains are prevalent in basketball. This study sought to determine how midfoot wraps affect postural stability and ankle proprioception.
Twenty-two amateur basketball athletes performed three single-leg balance tests (static, head-elevated static, and unstable foam pad) under four wrap conditions (no wrap, low, medium, and high pressure), and balance measures were taken using a force platform. Standing time, center of pressure dynamics, surface electromyographic of the supporting leg musculature were recorded. Ankle proprioception joint position matching error was assessed by a digital inclinometer.
Results indicated that during balance tests on foam padding, participants demonstrated significantly longer standing time when wearing low-pressure midfoot wraps, compared to high-pressure wraps ( (3,63) = 4.32, = 0.008, = 0.17). Wearing high-pressure wraps reduced anterior-posterior dynamic stability index variability ( (3,63) = 3.89, = 0.044, = 0.16), suggesting enhanced sagittal-plane control. Intriguingly, high-pressure conditions evidenced convergent activation trends between medial and lateral gastrocnemius (GM/GL ratio shift from 1.3 to 1.0), albeit without statistical significance ( > 0.05). No significant difference was detected in joint position sense in ankle dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, eversion and inversion between different wrap conditions ( > 0.05). These findings suggest that low-pressure midfoot wraps may improve balance through enhanced cutaneous feedback, while high-pressure wraps enhance anterior-posterior dynamic stability, providing biomechanically informed strategies for ankle injury prevention in basketball.
踝关节扭伤在篮球运动中很常见。本研究旨在确定足中部护具如何影响姿势稳定性和踝关节本体感觉。
22名业余篮球运动员在四种护具条件下(不使用护具、低压、中压和高压)进行了三项单腿平衡测试(静态、抬头静态和不稳定泡沫垫测试),并使用测力平台进行平衡测量。记录站立时间、压力中心动态、支撑腿肌肉组织的表面肌电图。通过数字倾角仪评估踝关节本体感觉关节位置匹配误差。
结果表明,在泡沫垫上进行平衡测试时,与高压护具相比,参与者佩戴低压足中部护具时站立时间显著延长((3,63)=4.32,=0.008,=0.17)。佩戴高压护具降低了前后动态稳定性指数的变异性((3,63)=3.89,=0.044,=0.16),表明矢状面控制得到增强。有趣的是,高压条件下腓肠肌内侧头和外侧头之间呈现出趋同的激活趋势(GM/GL比值从1.3变为1.0),尽管无统计学意义(>0.05)。不同护具条件下,踝关节背屈、跖屈、外翻和内翻的关节位置觉未检测到显著差异(>0.05)。这些发现表明,低压足中部护具可能通过增强皮肤反馈来改善平衡,而高压护具则增强前后动态稳定性,为篮球运动中预防踝关节损伤提供了具有生物力学依据的策略。