Xu Xiaobing, Wang Yan, Meng Juntong, Cao Wanlu, Liu Ye
School of Nursing, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Qilu Hospital, Shandong University (Qingdao), Qingdao, China.
Front Psychol. 2025 May 22;16:1456132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1456132. eCollection 2025.
Family resilience plays a crucial role in helping patients with chronic diseases manage their conditions and maintain overall well-being. The Family Resilience Inventory (FRI) assesses resilience across generations with a focus on protective and promotive factors. However, the FRI has not been translated into Chinese or validated for use among families managing chronic diseases. Therefore, this study aims to test assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Family Resilience Inventory (FRI-C) among patients with chronic diseases.
The Chinese version of the FRI was obtained through standardized forward translation and cultural adaptation. We recruited 307 patients with chronic diseases from a tertiary hospital in Qingdao, Shandong Province, to complete the FRI. Reliability was assessed using calculating Cronbach's alpha and Guttman split-half reliability. Construct validity was evaluated through the correlation of the FRI-C with the shortened Chinese version of the Family Resilience Assessment Scale (FRAS-C). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to validate the structural and discriminant validity of the questionnaire.
The FRI-C had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.964 with 0.959 and 0.952 for the two factors. The split-half reliability was 0.716 for the total scale and 0.961 and 0.943 for the two factors. The FRI-C scales and factor scores were significantly correlated with the FRAS-C total score (r values between 0.692 and 0.810, < 0.01). CFA revealed that /df, goodness-of-fit index, incremental fit index, normed fit index, Tucker-Lewis index, comparative fit index, and root-mean-square error of approximation were all within the acceptable range.
The FRI-C demonstrated strong reliability and validity among patients with chronic diseases and it can be used to evaluate family resilience.
家庭复原力在帮助慢性病患者控制病情和维持整体健康方面起着至关重要的作用。家庭复原力量表(FRI)评估了几代人的复原力,重点关注保护因素和促进因素。然而,FRI尚未被翻译成中文,也未在管理慢性病的家庭中进行有效性验证。因此,本研究旨在测试中文版家庭复原力量表(FRI-C)在慢性病患者中的信度和效度。
通过标准化的正向翻译和文化调适获得FRI的中文版。我们从山东省青岛市的一家三级医院招募了307名慢性病患者,以完成FRI。使用计算Cronbach's α系数和古特曼折半信度来评估信度。通过FRI-C与简化中文版家庭复原力评估量表(FRAS-C)的相关性来评估结构效度。使用验证性因素分析(CFA)来验证问卷的结构效度和区分效度。
FRI-C的Cronbach's α系数为0.964,两个因子的系数分别为0.959和0.952。总量表的折半信度为0.716,两个因子的折半信度分别为0.961和0.943。FRI-C量表和因子得分与FRAS-C总分显著相关(r值在0.692至0.810之间,P<0.01)。CFA显示,卡方自由度比、拟合优度指数、增值拟合指数、规范拟合指数、塔克-刘易斯指数、比较拟合指数和近似均方根误差均在可接受范围内。
FRI-C在慢性病患者中表现出很强的信度和效度,可用于评估家庭复原力。