Sun Jian, Li Linna, Tian Xue, Fu Yuping
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou Liaoning, 121001, China.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jan 21;25(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21439-7.
The Family Vitiligo Impact Scale (FVIS) is the first reliable and valid instrument to evaluate the psychological and social impact on family members with vitiligo. However, the FVIS has not yet been validated in China.
This study aimed to adapt the FVIS across cultures and utilize a cross-sectional design to validate its reliability and validity in evaluating the quality of life of family members with vitiligo in China.
The original version scale was first translated into Chinese using Brislin back- translation method. This study was conducted among adult individuals in China (N = 348). The participants were aged 18 to 70 years, with a mean age of 33.6 years (SD = 11.3). The sample consisted of 50.9% females (n = 177) and 49.1% males (n = 171). Respondents completed the Chinese versions of the FVIS and Family Dermatology Life Quality Index (FDLQI). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confrmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to test the construct validity of the scale, and the content validity of the scale was assessed through the content validity index. The internal consistency of the scale was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefcient, Omega coefcient, split-half reliability, and test-retest reliability.
EFA supported a three-factor structure, explaining 79.208% of cumulative variance. CFA demonstrated satisfactory construct validity for the FVIS, with excellent model fit: chi-square degree of freedom (χ/df) = 2.019, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.072, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.0145, Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.983, and Tucker Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.978. The content validity index of the scale was 0.979. The Cronbach's alpha coefcient was 0.975, Omega coefcient was 0.964, the split-half reliability coefcient was 0.977, and the test-retest reliability was 0.959.
The Chinese FVIS showed satisfactory reliability and validity for assessing vitiligo's psychosocial impact on family membersin Chinese clinical and research settings.
家庭白癜风影响量表(FVIS)是首个用于评估白癜风对家庭成员心理和社会影响的可靠且有效的工具。然而,FVIS尚未在中国得到验证。
本研究旨在对FVIS进行跨文化改编,并采用横断面设计来验证其在中国评估白癜风家庭成员生活质量时的可靠性和有效性。
最初版本的量表首先采用Brislin回译法翻译成中文。本研究在中国成年人中开展(N = 348)。参与者年龄在18至70岁之间,平均年龄为33.6岁(标准差 = 11.3)。样本中女性占50.9%(n = 177),男性占49.1%(n = 171)。受访者完成了FVIS中文版和家庭皮肤病生活质量指数(FDLQI)。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)来检验量表的结构效度,并通过内容效度指数评估量表的内容效度。通过计算克朗巴哈α系数、欧米伽系数、分半信度和重测信度来评估量表的内部一致性。
EFA支持三因素结构,解释了79.208%的累积方差。CFA表明FVIS具有令人满意的结构效度,模型拟合良好:卡方自由度(χ/df)= 2.019,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)= 0.072,标准化均方根残差(SRMR)= 0.0145,比较拟合指数(CFI)= 0.983,塔克·刘易斯指数(TLI)= 0.978。量表的内容效度指数为0.979。克朗巴哈α系数为0.975,欧米伽系数为0.964,分半信度系数为0.977,重测信度为0.959。
中文版FVIS在评估白癜风对中国临床和研究环境中家庭成员的心理社会影响方面显示出令人满意的可靠性和有效性。