Suppr超能文献

患者信息文件如何呈现透析和保守肾脏管理?一项文献分析。

How do patient information documents present dialysis and conservative kidney management? A document analysis.

作者信息

Sowden Ryann, Shaw Chloe, Robb James, Winterbottom Anna, Bristowe Katherine, Bekker Hilary L, Tulsky James, Murtagh Fliss E M, Barnes Rebecca, Caskey Fergus J, Selman Lucy E

机构信息

Palliative and End of Life Care Research Group, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Clin Kidney J. 2025 May 12;18(6):sfaf136. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaf136. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most older people with advanced kidney disease face a decision between conservative kidney management (CKM) or dialysis and must weigh their potential benefits, risks and impacts on quality and length of life. Patient information documents are designed to supplement patients' understanding of their kidney disease and explain treatment options to support decision-making. We aimed to explore how patient information documents frame the treatment options of CKM and dialysis and consider implications for patients' treatment choice.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative document analysis of patient information documents collected from four UK renal outpatient departments with variation in rates of CKM for people ≥75 years of age. Data were analysed using critical discourse analysis.

RESULTS

Three global themes were identified: 1) Treatment options are not presented equally: Dialysis was constructed as the assumed patient choice. CKM was often omitted as an option; when included, it was always mentioned last and was typically constructed negatively. 2) Deciding is challenging: Treatment decision-making, particularly choosing CKM, was portrayed as a challenge requiring emotional support, with clinicians the ultimate decision-maker. 3) Dialysis is living, CKM is dying: Patient information documents presented patients as living with one treatment option choice (dialysis) and dying with another (CKM). Advance care planning, palliative care and information about dying were presented only in the context of CKM, implying these were irrelevant topics for people choosing dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient information documents presented unbalanced explanations of dialysis and CKM. Dialysis was framed as 'treatment' and possible complications were minimized. CKM was framed as 'non-treatment' and linked to advance care planning, palliative care and death. Inaccurate framing of both CKM and dialysis may mean patients exclude treatment options that may be more concordant with their goals, values and preferences.

摘要

背景

大多数患有晚期肾病的老年人面临着在保守肾脏管理(CKM)或透析之间做出决定的问题,并且必须权衡它们对生活质量和寿命的潜在益处、风险及影响。患者信息文件旨在补充患者对自身肾病的理解,并解释治疗选择以支持决策制定。我们旨在探讨患者信息文件如何阐述CKM和透析的治疗选择,并考虑其对患者治疗选择的影响。

方法

我们对从英国四个肾科门诊收集的患者信息文件进行了定性文件分析,这些门诊中75岁及以上人群的CKM发生率有所不同。使用批判性话语分析对数据进行分析。

结果

确定了三个总体主题:1)治疗选择的呈现不均衡:透析被构建为假定的患者选择。CKM常常被遗漏作为一种选择;当被纳入时,它总是最后被提及,并且通常被负面构建。2)决策具有挑战性:治疗决策,尤其是选择CKM,被描绘为一项需要情感支持的挑战,临床医生是最终决策者。3)透析意味着生存,CKM意味着死亡:患者信息文件将患者呈现为选择一种治疗选择(透析)为生,选择另一种(CKM)为死。预先护理计划、姑息治疗和关于死亡的信息仅在CKM的背景下呈现,这意味着这些对于选择透析的人来说是不相关的话题。

结论

患者信息文件对透析和CKM的解释不均衡。透析被构建为“治疗”,其可能的并发症被最小化。CKM被构建为“非治疗”,并与预先护理计划、姑息治疗和死亡相关联。对CKM和透析的错误构建可能意味着患者排除了可能与其目标、价值观和偏好更相符的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fe3/12142001/a700d1f9ae2b/sfaf136fig1g.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验