Institute for Communication in Health Care (ICH), College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Baldessin Precinct Building, 110 Ellery Crescent, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
Canberra Hospital Renal Service, Canberra, Australia.
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Dec 21;24(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03406-9.
Effective interpersonal communication is critical for shared decision-making (SDM). Previous SDM communication training in nephrology has lacked context-specific evidence from ethnographic analysis of SDM interactions with older patients considering treatment options of end stage kidney disease (ESKD). This study explores communication strategies in SDM discussions in nephrology, specifically focusing on older patients considering dialysis as kidney replacement therapy (KRT).
We conducted a qualitative study analysing naturally-occurring audio-recorded clinical interactions (n = 12) between Australian kidney doctors, patients aged 60+, and carers. Linguistic ethnography and qualitative socially-oriented functional approaches were used for analysis.
Two types of communication strategies emerged: (1) Managing and advancing treatment decisions: involving active checking of knowledge, clear explanations of options, and local issue resolution. (2) Pulling back: Deferring or delaying decisions through mixed messaging. Specifically for non-English speaking patients, pulling back was further characterised by communication challenges deferring decision-making including ineffective issue management, and reliance on family as interpreters. Age was not an explicit topic of discussion among participants when it came to making decisions about KRT but was highly relevant to treatment decision-making. Doctors appeared reluctant to broach non-dialysis conservative management, even when it appears clinically appropriate. Conservative care, an alternative to KRT suitable for older patients with co-morbidities, was only explicitly discussed when prompted by patients or carers.
The findings highlight the impact of different communication strategies on SDM discussions in nephrology. This study calls for linguistic-informed contextualised communication training and provides foundational evidence for nephrology-specific communication skills training in SDM for KRT among older patients. There is urgent need for doctors to become confident and competent in discussing non-dialysis conservative management. Further international research should explore naturally-occurring SDM interactions in nephrology with other vulnerable groups to enhance evidence and training integration.
有效的人际沟通对于共同决策(SDM)至关重要。以前的肾病学 SDM 沟通培训缺乏人种学分析的具体背景证据,该分析涉及 SDM 与考虑终末期肾病(ESKD)治疗方案的老年患者之间的互动。本研究探讨了肾病学中 SDM 讨论中的沟通策略,特别是针对考虑透析作为肾脏替代治疗(KRT)的老年患者。
我们进行了一项定性研究,分析了澳大利亚肾脏医生、60 岁以上患者和照顾者之间自然发生的音频记录临床互动(n=12)。使用语言民族志和定性社会导向功能方法进行分析。
出现了两种沟通策略:(1)管理和推进治疗决策:主动检查知识、清晰解释选项和解决本地问题。(2)退缩:通过混合信息传达来推迟或延迟决策。特别是对于非英语患者,退缩的特点还包括沟通障碍,包括决策无效的问题管理和依赖家庭作为口译员。在决定 KRT 时,参与者并没有明确讨论年龄问题,但年龄与治疗决策高度相关。医生似乎不愿意提出非透析保守治疗,即使在临床上是合适的。保守治疗是 KRT 的替代方案,适用于患有合并症的老年患者,但只有在患者或照顾者提出时才会明确讨论。
研究结果强调了不同沟通策略对肾病学中 SDM 讨论的影响。本研究呼吁进行以语言为基础、具有上下文背景的沟通培训,并为针对老年患者的 KRT 进行基于 SDM 的肾病学特定沟通技能培训提供基础证据。医生迫切需要在讨论非透析保守治疗方面变得自信和熟练。进一步的国际研究应探索肾病学中与其他弱势群体的自然 SDM 互动,以增强证据和培训的整合。