• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗后肾结石碎片的自然史:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Natural History of Post-Treatment Kidney Stone Fragments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Newcastle Medical School, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England.

Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, England.

出版信息

J Urol. 2021 Sep;206(3):526-538. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001836. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000001836
PMID:33904756
Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed the literature around post-treatment asymptomatic residual stone fragments and performed a meta-analysis. The main outcomes were intervention rate and disease progression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched Ovid®, MEDLINE®, Embase™, the Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov using search terms: "asymptomatic", "nephrolithiasis", "ESWL", "PCNL", "URS" and "intervention." Inclusion criteria were all studies with residual renal fragments following treatment (shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy). Analysis was performed using 'metafor' in R and bias determined using Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

From 273 articles, 18 papers (2,096 patients) had details of intervention rate for residual fragments. Aggregate intervention rates for ≤4 mm fragments rose from 19% (20 months) to 22% (50 months), while >4 mm fragments rose from 22% to 47%. Aggregate disease progression rates for ≤4 mm rose from 25% to 47% and >4 mm rose from 26% to 88%. However, there was substantial difference in definition of "disease progression." Meta-analysis comparing >4 mm against ≤4 mm fragments: intervention rate for >4 mm (vs ≤4 mm): OR=1.50 (95% CI 0.70-2.30), p <0.001, I=67.6%, tau=0.48, Cochran's Q=11.4 (p=0.02) and Egger's regression: z=3.11, p=0.002. Disease progression rate for >4 mm: OR=0.06 (95% CI -0.98-1.10), p=0.91, I=53.0%, tau=0.57, Cochran's Q=7.11 (p=0.07) and Egger's regression: z=-0.75, p=0.45. Bias analysis demonstrated a moderate risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger post-treatment residual fragments are significantly more likely to require further intervention especially in the long term. Smaller fragments, although less likely to require further intervention, still carry that risk. Notably, there is no significant difference in disease progression between fragment sizes. Patients with residual fragments should be appropriately counselled and informed decision-making regarding further management should be done.

摘要

目的

我们评估了治疗后无症状残留结石碎片的文献,并进行了荟萃分析。主要结局是干预率和疾病进展。

材料和方法

我们使用搜索词“无症状”、“肾结石”、“ESWL”、“PCNL”、“URS”和“干预”在 Ovid®、MEDLINE®、Embase™、Cochrane 图书馆和 ClinicalTrials.gov 中搜索。纳入标准为所有治疗后有肾内残留碎片的研究(冲击波碎石术、输尿管镜检查或经皮肾镜取石术)。分析使用 R 中的“metafor”进行,使用 Newcastle-Ottawa 量表确定偏倚。

结果

从 273 篇文章中,有 18 篇文章(2096 例患者)详细描述了残留碎片的干预率。≤4mm 碎片的总干预率从 19%(20 个月)上升到 22%(50 个月),而>4mm 碎片的总干预率从 22%上升到 47%。≤4mm 碎片的总疾病进展率从 25%上升到 47%,而>4mm 碎片的总疾病进展率从 26%上升到 88%。然而,“疾病进展”的定义存在很大差异。比较>4mm 与≤4mm 碎片的荟萃分析:>4mm 干预率(与≤4mm 相比):OR=1.50(95% CI 0.70-2.30),p<0.001,I=67.6%,tau=0.48,Cochran's Q=11.4(p=0.02),Egger 回归:z=3.11,p=0.002。>4mm 碎片的疾病进展率:OR=0.06(95% CI -0.98-1.10),p=0.91,I=53.0%,tau=0.57,Cochran's Q=7.11(p=0.07),Egger 回归:z=-0.75,p=0.45。偏倚分析显示存在中度风险。

结论

较大的治疗后残留碎片更有可能需要进一步干预,尤其是在长期。较小的碎片虽然不太可能需要进一步干预,但仍有这种风险。值得注意的是,碎片大小之间没有明显的疾病进展差异。对于有残留碎片的患者,应进行适当的咨询,并进行进一步管理的知情决策。

相似文献

1
Natural History of Post-Treatment Kidney Stone Fragments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.治疗后肾结石碎片的自然史:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Urol. 2021 Sep;206(3):526-538. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001836. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).10 - 20毫米下极结石最佳治疗方法的荟萃分析:可弯曲输尿管镜检查(FURS)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对比经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25.
3
Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm.输尿管软镜与体外冲击波碎石术治疗 10-20mm 下极结石的比较。
BJU Int. 2012 Sep;110(6):898-902. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10961.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
4
Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.尿路结石的治疗选择:经皮肾镜碎石术、输尿管镜碎石术、体外冲击波碎石术和主动监测。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1395-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
5
Endourologic Management (PCNL, URS, SWL) of Stones in Solitary Kidney: A Systematic Review from European Association of Urologists Young Academic Urologists and Uro-Technology Groups.经皮肾镜取石术、输尿管镜碎石取石术、体外冲击波碎石术治疗孤立肾结石的腔内泌尿外科管理:欧洲泌尿外科学会青年学者泌尿外科学组和泌尿技术组的系统评价。
J Endourol. 2020 Jan;34(1):7-17. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0455. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
6
The Durability of Active Surveillance in Patients with Asymptomatic Kidney Stones: A Systematic Review.无症状肾结石患者主动监测的耐久性:系统评价。
J Endourol. 2019 Jul;33(7):598-605. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0695. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
7
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for management of pediatric nephrolithiasis in upper urinary tract stones: multi-institutional outcomes of efficacy and morbidity.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石儿童肾结石:多机构疗效和并发症的结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Oct;15(5):516.e1-516.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
8
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs. Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy vs. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Lower Pole Renal Stones 10-20 mm : A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术及体外冲击波碎石术治疗10-20mm下极肾结石的Meta分析与系统评价
Urol J. 2019 May 5;16(2):97-106. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4681.
9
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2.
10
Patient decision making for asymptomatic renal calculi: balancing benefit and risk.无症状肾结石患者的决策:权衡获益与风险。
Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):236-40. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.032.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of suction in revolutionising endourology: Is it the final frontier - an overview from EAU Endourology.吸引术在革新腔内泌尿外科中的作用:它是最终前沿领域吗——来自欧洲泌尿外科协会腔内泌尿外科的概述
Cent European J Urol. 2025;78(2):181-183. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2025.0105. Epub 2025 May 25.
2
Ureteroscopy vs Shockwave Lithotripsy to Remove Kidney Stones in Children and Adolescents: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.输尿管镜检查与冲击波碎石术治疗儿童及青少年肾结石的比较:一项非随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525789. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25789.
3
Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stones comparing non suction conventional UAS vs flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths in a multicenter real-world experience. Is it finally time to bury the no suction ureteral access sheath? An EAU endourology analysis.
多中心真实世界经验中,比较非抽吸传统输尿管镜鞘与可弯曲及可导航抽吸输尿管镜鞘在肾结石治疗中的应用。是时候淘汰非抽吸输尿管镜鞘了吗?一项欧洲泌尿外科学会腔内泌尿外科分析。
World J Urol. 2025 Jun 25;43(1):390. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05748-5.
4
A novel small fragment removal system holds promise to improve stone extraction during lithotripsy.一种新型小碎片清除系统有望在碎石术期间改善结石取出效果。
World J Urol. 2025 Jun 9;43(1):365. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05711-4.
5
RIRS with flexible vacuum-assisted UAS versus MPCNL for impacted upper ureteral stones: a prospective, randomized controlled study.软性真空辅助输尿管镜下逆行肾盂内手术(RIRS)与微创经皮肾镜取石术(MPCNL)治疗上段输尿管嵌顿性结石的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2025 Jun 4;53(1):105. doi: 10.1007/s00240-025-01781-6.
6
Factors influencing computed tomography determined stone-free rates after ureteroscopy in real-world and its impact on retreatment rates at medium-term follow-up.影响实际应用中输尿管镜检查后计算机断层扫描确定的无结石率的因素及其对中期随访再治疗率的影响。
World J Urol. 2025 Jun 3;43(1):350. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05721-2.
7
Residual stone fragments: systematic review of definitions, diagnostic standards.残留结石碎片:定义与诊断标准的系统评价
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 28;43(1):194. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05572-x.
8
Is flexible navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) safer and more efficient than conventional sheaths? Italian multicentric experience.可弯曲可导航的输尿管吸引接入鞘(FANS)是否比传统鞘更安全、更高效?意大利多中心经验。
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 6;43(1):153. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05520-9.
9
Increased efficacy in lower pole stone management with a novel flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a case series.新型可弯曲且可导航的输尿管吸引鞘联合可弯曲输尿管镜碎石术治疗下极结石的疗效增强:病例系列研究
Transl Androl Urol. 2025 Jan 31;14(1):158-165. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-388. Epub 2025 Jan 20.
10
Improved display and detection of small renal stones using photon-counting detector CT compared to conventional energy-integrating detector CT.与传统能量积分探测器CT相比,使用光子计数探测器CT可改善小肾结石的显示和检测。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan 27. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04781-z.