Lin Tong, Wang Yuan, Thier Kathryn, Nan Xiaoli
Department of Communication, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.
Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
J Behav Med. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00578-7.
This study examined the impact of social norms-descriptive, injunctive, and subjective norms-on COVID-19 vaccination intentions among Black Americans. It also investigated how Black Americans affiliated with Democrats and Republicans perceived norms within their groups and how such perceptions influenced their COVID-19 vaccination intentions. We conducted an online national survey with Black Americans (N = 1497) between February and March 2021. Results showed that all three types of norms were significantly and positively associated with vaccination intentions, with subjective norms exerting the strongest effect. Additionally, higher subjective norms amplified the positive relationship between descriptive norms and vaccination intentions. Republicans were influenced by both in-group and out-group norms, while Democrats were primarily guided by in-group norms, underscoring the potential of bipartisan messaging to boost vaccine uptake. These findings highlight how social norms impact COVID-19 vaccination intentions and reveal that individuals with differing party affiliations are influenced differently based on their perceived identification with reference groups. The study provides insights for designing targeted interventions to improve vaccine uptake among Black Americans and for developing broader public health messaging strategies. It contributes to the literature by revealing how the interplay of descriptive, injunctive, and subjective norms shapes vaccination intentions and by offering a novel perspective on the differentiated effects of in-group and out-group norms based on partisan identity.
本研究考察了社会规范(描述性规范、指令性规范和主观规范)对美国黑人新冠疫苗接种意愿的影响。研究还调查了隶属于民主党和共和党的美国黑人如何看待其群体中的规范,以及这些看法如何影响他们的新冠疫苗接种意愿。我们在2021年2月至3月期间对美国黑人进行了一项全国性在线调查(N = 1497)。结果显示,所有三种类型的规范都与接种意愿显著正相关,其中主观规范的影响最强。此外,更高的主观规范增强了描述性规范与接种意愿之间的正向关系。共和党人受到内群体和外群体规范的影响,而民主党人主要受内群体规范的引导,这凸显了两党信息传递在提高疫苗接种率方面的潜力。这些发现突出了社会规范如何影响新冠疫苗接种意愿,并揭示了不同党派归属的个体因其对参照群体的感知认同而受到不同的影响。该研究为设计有针对性的干预措施以提高美国黑人的疫苗接种率以及制定更广泛的公共卫生信息传播策略提供了见解。它通过揭示描述性、指令性和主观规范的相互作用如何塑造接种意愿,并基于党派身份对内群体和外群体规范的差异化影响提供了新视角,为相关文献做出了贡献。