Siddell Stuart G, Smith Donald B
School of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
J Gen Virol. 2025 Jun;106(6). doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.002102.
The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses now mandates that all virus species names be presented in a binomial format. This requirement replaces the various naming formats that have been used since the first official virus taxonomy Report was published in 1971. A review of virus classification schemes as they have developed over the past century shows that, although there was an initial inclination to adopt a Linnaean binomial nomenclature, various other naming formats were gradually introduced for practical and scientific reasons. However, as our understanding of viruses has advanced - especially with the increasing availability of genomic sequences - the arguments for these alternative formats (such as that viruses were not living or that they evolved too quickly) have diminished. The nomenclature for virus species now aligns more closely with the conventions used in other areas of biology, the format having nearly come full circle from its beginnings a century ago.
国际病毒分类委员会现规定,所有病毒物种名称均应以双名法形式呈现。这一要求取代了自1971年首份官方病毒分类报告发布以来所使用的各种命名格式。回顾过去一个世纪病毒分类方案的发展历程可以发现,尽管最初倾向于采用林奈双名法命名,但出于实际和科学原因,逐渐引入了各种其他命名格式。然而,随着我们对病毒的认识不断深入——尤其是随着基因组序列的可得性不断提高——支持这些替代格式的论据(例如病毒不是生物或它们进化太快)已经减少。病毒物种的命名法现在与生物学其他领域所使用的惯例更为一致,这种格式从一个世纪前开始几乎又回到了原点。