• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农药标签(象形图和颜色代码)问卷的开发与验证:黎巴嫩农民认知与实践的一项初步研究

Development and validation of the pesticides label (pictograms and color codes) questionnaire: A pilot study of farmers' understanding and practices in Lebanon.

作者信息

Aridi Mona, Ibrahim Sara Abou, Alwan Nisreen, Ghach Wissam

机构信息

LARIS, University of Angers, Angers 49000, France.

Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Education, Modern University for Business and Science, Damour, Lebanon.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 9;20(6):e0321591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321591. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0321591
PMID:40489554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12148187/
Abstract

Farmers' comprehension of color codes and pictograms of pesticides is crucial for ensuring the safe and effective use of these agricultural chemicals. These visual aids provide essential information about hazards, proper handling, and application methods. This understanding helps prevent accidents, protect health, and promote sustainable farming practices. This study aims to develop and validate a Pesticide Label Questionnaire (PLQ) qualitatively and quantitatively using psychometric measures to evaluate farmers' comprehension of pictograms and color codes as well as the technical sign-related practices in Lebanon. The questionnaire, consisting of 29 statements, was generated and developed by experts in the field of agriculture, chemistry, environmental health, public health, and statistics. Face, content, and construct validity were assessed, and psychometric properties were examined for data validation. Internal consistency and reliability were measured using Cronbach's alpha (α) and Guttman's Lambda Coefficient. Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 27) and RStudio (Version 1.1.456, Inc., 2009-2018). The Construct Validity analyses demonstrated strong reliability and coherence within the questionnaire, with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.873. Section I ("Pictorial and Color Code Comprehension") achieved a Cronbach's alpha of 0.849, while section II ("Technical Sign-related Practice Assessment") showed moderate reliability at 0.667. Factor analyses revealed a well-defined structure, with five components explaining 62.03% of the variance in section I and three components accounting for 61.81% in section II. These results highlight the questionnaire's robust construct validity and its ability to capture key dimensions of comprehension and practice related to pesticide labels. The results of this study indicate that the 29-item PLQ is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating farmers' understanding of pictograms and color codes along with technical sign-related practices.

摘要

农民对农药颜色代码和象形图的理解对于确保安全有效地使用这些农用化学品至关重要。这些视觉辅助工具提供了有关危害、正确处理和施用方法的重要信息。这种理解有助于预防事故、保护健康并促进可持续农业实践。本研究旨在使用心理测量方法定性和定量地开发和验证农药标签问卷(PLQ),以评估黎巴嫩农民对象形图和颜色代码的理解以及与技术标志相关的实践。该问卷由农业、化学、环境卫生、公共卫生和统计学领域的专家生成并开发,包含29条陈述。评估了表面效度、内容效度和结构效度,并检查了心理测量特性以进行数据验证。使用克朗巴哈系数(α)和古特曼λ系数测量内部一致性和可靠性。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS 27版)和RStudio(1.1.456版,公司,2009 - 2018年)进行统计分析。结构效度分析表明问卷内部具有很强的可靠性和连贯性,总体克朗巴哈系数为0.873。第一部分(“象形图和颜色代码理解”)的克朗巴哈系数为0.849,而第二部分(“与技术标志相关的实践评估”)的可靠性适中,为0.667。因子分析揭示了一个明确的结构,五个成分解释了第一部分中62.03%的方差,三个成分解释了第二部分中61.81%的方差。这些结果突出了问卷强大的结构效度及其捕捉与农药标签相关的理解和实践关键维度的能力。本研究结果表明,29项的PLQ是评估农民对象形图和颜色代码以及与技术标志相关实践理解的有效且可靠的工具。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the pesticides label (pictograms and color codes) questionnaire: A pilot study of farmers' understanding and practices in Lebanon.农药标签(象形图和颜色代码)问卷的开发与验证:黎巴嫩农民认知与实践的一项初步研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 9;20(6):e0321591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321591. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessment of farmers' understanding of the pictograms displayed on pesticide labels.评估农民对农药标签上显示的象形图的理解程度。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(14):17812-17825. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11821-w. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Farmer's behaviors toward pesticides use: insight from a field study in Oriental Morocco.农民对农药使用的行为:来自摩洛哥东部一项实地研究的见解。
Environ Anal Health Toxicol. 2021 Mar;36(1):e2021002-0. doi: 10.5620/eaht.2021002. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
4
Development of Psychometric Properties of Farmers' Occupational Health Behavior Questionnaire for Iranian Farmers.农民职业健康行为问卷的心理计量特性在伊朗农民中的发展。
J Agromedicine. 2020 Jul;25(3):279-285. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1674227. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
South African farm workers' interpretation of risk assessment data expressed as pictograms on pesticide labels.南非农场工人对农药标签上以象形图表示的风险评估数据的解读。
Environ Res. 2008 Nov;108(3):419-27. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
6
Validity and reliability of Household Disinfectants-Cleaners Questionnaire (HDCQ) to investigate public awareness and performance in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.用于调查阿布扎比酋长国公众认知与行为的家用消毒剂-清洁剂调查问卷(HDCQ)的有效性和可靠性
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 29;25(1):1201. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22317-y.
7
Farmers' behavior in reading and using risk information displayed on pesticide labels: a test with the theory of planned behavior.农民阅读和使用农药标签上显示的风险信息的行为:计划行为理论的检验。
Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Jun;77(6):2903-2913. doi: 10.1002/ps.6326. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
A multidimensional tool to measure farm stressors: development and initial validation of the farmer stress assessment tool (FSAT).一种多维工具来衡量农场压力源:农民压力评估工具(FSAT)的开发和初步验证。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 12;12(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01929-w.
9
Pesticide practices in coastal agricultural farms of Lebanon.黎巴嫩沿海农业农场的农药使用情况。
Int J Environ Health Res. 2021 Mar;31(2):132-147. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2019.1634797. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
The validity and reliability properties of a Persian version of the evidence-based practice profile (EBP) questionnaire among Iranian students of health-related fields.一个基于证据的实践概况(EBP)问卷的波斯语版本在伊朗健康相关领域学生中的有效性和可靠性特性。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06139-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of public awareness and performance toward the safe use of household disinfectants-cleaners to prevent COVID-19 in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi.评估阿布扎比酋长国公众对安全使用家用消毒剂/清洁剂以预防 COVID-19 的意识和表现。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 28;11:1214240. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1214240. eCollection 2023.
2
Development and Validation of the Soft Skills Questionnaire for Nurses.护士软技能问卷的编制与验证
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Mar 6;9:23779608231159620. doi: 10.1177/23779608231159620. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Farmer's behaviors toward pesticides use: insight from a field study in Oriental Morocco.
农民对农药使用的行为:来自摩洛哥东部一项实地研究的见解。
Environ Anal Health Toxicol. 2021 Mar;36(1):e2021002-0. doi: 10.5620/eaht.2021002. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
4
Assessment of farmers' understanding of the pictograms displayed on pesticide labels.评估农民对农药标签上显示的象形图的理解程度。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(14):17812-17825. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11821-w. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
5
The global distribution of acute unintentional pesticide poisoning: estimations based on a systematic review.全球急性非故意农药中毒分布情况:基于系统评价的估计。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1875. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09939-0.
6
A review of organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in Lebanon: Environmental and human contaminants.黎巴嫩有机氯农药和多氯联苯的研究综述:环境和人体污染物。
Chemosphere. 2019 Sep;231:357-368. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.109. Epub 2019 May 15.
7
Pesticide residues in Lebanese apples and health risk assessment.黎巴嫩苹果中的农药残留与健康风险评估。
Food Addit Contam Part B Surveill. 2019 Jun;12(2):81-89. doi: 10.1080/19393210.2018.1564370. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
8
Assessment of pesticide contamination in Akkar groundwater, northern Lebanon.黎巴嫩北部阿卡地下水的农药污染评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 May;25(15):14302-14312. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8568-6. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
9
Design and Implementation Content Validity Study: Development of an instrument for measuring Patient-Centered Communication.设计与实施内容效度研究:开发一种用于测量以患者为中心的沟通的工具。
J Caring Sci. 2015 Jun 1;4(2):165-78. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017. eCollection 2015 Jun.
10
Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards.农业中农药使用的影响:其益处与危害。
Interdiscip Toxicol. 2009 Mar;2(1):1-12. doi: 10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7.