文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

土壤研究中不同测序方法的一致微生物见解:参考分类法的作用

Consistent microbial insights across sequencing methods in soil studies: the role of reference taxonomies.

作者信息

Edwin Niranjana Rose, Duff Aoife, Deveautour Coline, Brennan Fiona, Abram Florence, O'Sullivan Orla

机构信息

Teagasc, Moorepark Food Research Centre, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.

Functional Environmental Microbiology, University of Galway, Galway, County Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

mSystems. 2025 Jul 22;10(7):e0105924. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01059-24. Epub 2025 Jun 10.


DOI:10.1128/msystems.01059-24
PMID:40492742
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12282176/
Abstract

Microbes play an important role in soil functioning, underpinning food production systems and delivering an array of essential ecosystem services. To elucidate how these microbes relate to ecosystem functions, accurate identification and classification of soil microorganisms are important. We evaluated the comparability of shotgun and amplicon sequencing approaches by profiling soil microbiota from 131 diverse temperate grassland soils across Ireland. We assessed method comparability in terms of (i) detection and classification of the most abundant phyla, (ii) their capacity to differentiate samples based on their microbial community, and (iii) their capacity to link microbial communities to measured nitrogen cycle functions. Our findings reveal that both methods offer moderately similar outcomes, providing consistent detection of major phyla, similar microbial community differentiation patterns, and largely identifying the same relationships between the phyla and nitrogen functions. The variations observed between the two methods were mostly associated with differences in the choice of reference taxonomy. Amplicon sequencing represents a cost-effective, less computationally demanding option, while shotgun sequencing provides deeper taxonomic resolution and access to the latest databases, making it suitable for detailed microbial profiling. Our study underscores the need for careful method selection based on project requirements, database availability, and financial resources.IMPORTANCEStudying the microorganisms in soil remains a challenge as soils are one of the most complex and diverse environments. Compounding these challenges is the lack of culturable representatives in soil, with over 99% of soil microorganisms yet to be cultivated in a laboratory setting. Leveraging next-generation sequencing technologies, which bypass traditional culture-dependent methods, scientists are now able to attain low-cost, high-throughput DNA sequencing that can detect even the rarest microorganisms within samples. The present study rigorously compares amplicon and shotgun sequencing techniques in profiling microbial communities across diverse temperate grassland soil samples, focusing on how different databases, classifiers, and sequencing methods influence the results. Our study underscores the crucial need for a harmonized taxonomic database that could greatly enhance comparability and accuracy in the understanding of soil microbiomes.

摘要

微生物在土壤功能中发挥着重要作用,支撑着粮食生产系统并提供一系列重要的生态系统服务。为了阐明这些微生物与生态系统功能之间的关系,准确识别和分类土壤微生物至关重要。我们通过对爱尔兰各地131种不同的温带草原土壤中的土壤微生物群进行分析,评估了鸟枪法测序和扩增子测序方法的可比性。我们从以下几个方面评估了方法的可比性:(i)最丰富门的检测和分类;(ii)它们基于微生物群落区分样本的能力;(iii)它们将微生物群落与测得的氮循环功能联系起来的能力。我们的研究结果表明,两种方法都提供了适度相似的结果,对主要门的检测一致,微生物群落分化模式相似,并且在很大程度上确定了门与氮功能之间的相同关系。两种方法之间观察到的差异大多与参考分类法的选择差异有关。扩增子测序是一种经济高效、计算要求较低的选择,而鸟枪法测序提供了更深层次的分类分辨率并能访问最新数据库,使其适用于详细的微生物分析。我们的研究强调了根据项目要求、数据库可用性和财务资源仔细选择方法的必要性。

重要性 研究土壤中的微生物仍然是一项挑战,因为土壤是最复杂和多样的环境之一。使这些挑战更加复杂 的是土壤中缺乏可培养的代表物种,超过99%的土壤微生物尚未在实验室环境中培养出来。利用绕过传统依赖培养方法的下一代测序技术,科学家现在能够获得低成本、高通量的DNA测序,甚至可以检测样本中最罕见的微生物。本研究严格比较了扩增子测序和鸟枪法测序技术在分析不同温带草原土壤样本中的微生物群落方面的情况,重点关注不同的数据库、分类器和测序方法如何影响结果。我们的研究强调了迫切需要一个统一的分类数据库,这可以大大提高在理解土壤微生物群落方面的可比性和准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbff/12282176/e269d871c74c/msystems.01059-24.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbff/12282176/185815d0fac7/msystems.01059-24.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbff/12282176/030867c31585/msystems.01059-24.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbff/12282176/e269d871c74c/msystems.01059-24.f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbff/12282176/185815d0fac7/msystems.01059-24.f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbff/12282176/030867c31585/msystems.01059-24.f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbff/12282176/e269d871c74c/msystems.01059-24.f003.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Consistent microbial insights across sequencing methods in soil studies: the role of reference taxonomies.

mSystems. 2025-7-22

[2]
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-20

[3]
GenomicGapID: leveraging spatial distribution of conserved genomic sites for broad-spectrum microbial identification.

Microbiol Spectr. 2025-5-6

[4]
Patchy burn severity explains heterogeneous soil viral and prokaryotic responses to fire in a mixed conifer forest.

mSystems. 2025-5-14

[5]
Characterizing the seminal microbiota in mature rams managed on divergent planes of nutrition, and their male offspring.

J Anim Sci. 2025-1-4

[6]
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-2

[7]
Fungi Follow Flora, Bacteria Track the Seasons: A Tale of a Changing Landscape.

Microb Ecol. 2025-6-20

[8]
Can a Liquid Biopsy Detect Circulating Tumor DNA With Low-passage Whole-genome Sequencing in Patients With a Sarcoma? A Pilot Evaluation.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025-1-1

[9]
The evaluation of shotgun sequencing and rpoB metabarcoding for taxonomic profiling of bacterial communities.

BMC Microbiol. 2025-7-4

[10]
Determinism and stochasticity drive microbial community assembly and microbial interactions in calcareous glacier forefields.

Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025-6-18

本文引用的文献

[1]
An in-depth evaluation of metagenomic classifiers for soil microbiomes.

Environ Microbiome. 2024-3-28

[2]
On validly published names, correct names, and changes in the nomenclature of phyla and genera of prokaryotes: a guide for the perplexed.

NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024-3-11

[3]
Greengenes2 unifies microbial data in a single reference tree.

Nat Biotechnol. 2024-5

[4]
Accounting for 16S rRNA copy number prediction uncertainty and its implications in bacterial diversity analyses.

ISME Commun. 2023-6-10

[5]
Metagenomics Provides a Deeper Assessment of the Diversity of Bacterial Communities in Polar Soils Than Metabarcoding.

Genes (Basel). 2023-3-28

[6]
Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species using MetaPhlAn 4.

Nat Biotechnol. 2023-11

[7]
Drastic reduction of false positive species in samples of insects by intersecting the default output of two popular metagenomic classifiers.

PLoS One. 2022

[8]
SeqCode: a nomenclatural code for prokaryotes described from sequence data.

Nat Microbiol. 2022-10

[9]
New Phylum Names Harmonize Prokaryotic Nomenclature.

mBio. 2022-10-26

[10]
Questioning the Quality of 16S rRNA Gene Sequences Derived From Human Gut Metagenome-Assembled Genomes.

Front Microbiol. 2022-2-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索