Edwin Niranjana Rose, Duff Aoife, Deveautour Coline, Brennan Fiona, Abram Florence, O'Sullivan Orla
Teagasc, Moorepark Food Research Centre, Fermoy, County Cork, Ireland.
Functional Environmental Microbiology, University of Galway, Galway, County Galway, Ireland.
mSystems. 2025 Jul 22;10(7):e0105924. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01059-24. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
Microbes play an important role in soil functioning, underpinning food production systems and delivering an array of essential ecosystem services. To elucidate how these microbes relate to ecosystem functions, accurate identification and classification of soil microorganisms are important. We evaluated the comparability of shotgun and amplicon sequencing approaches by profiling soil microbiota from 131 diverse temperate grassland soils across Ireland. We assessed method comparability in terms of (i) detection and classification of the most abundant phyla, (ii) their capacity to differentiate samples based on their microbial community, and (iii) their capacity to link microbial communities to measured nitrogen cycle functions. Our findings reveal that both methods offer moderately similar outcomes, providing consistent detection of major phyla, similar microbial community differentiation patterns, and largely identifying the same relationships between the phyla and nitrogen functions. The variations observed between the two methods were mostly associated with differences in the choice of reference taxonomy. Amplicon sequencing represents a cost-effective, less computationally demanding option, while shotgun sequencing provides deeper taxonomic resolution and access to the latest databases, making it suitable for detailed microbial profiling. Our study underscores the need for careful method selection based on project requirements, database availability, and financial resources.IMPORTANCEStudying the microorganisms in soil remains a challenge as soils are one of the most complex and diverse environments. Compounding these challenges is the lack of culturable representatives in soil, with over 99% of soil microorganisms yet to be cultivated in a laboratory setting. Leveraging next-generation sequencing technologies, which bypass traditional culture-dependent methods, scientists are now able to attain low-cost, high-throughput DNA sequencing that can detect even the rarest microorganisms within samples. The present study rigorously compares amplicon and shotgun sequencing techniques in profiling microbial communities across diverse temperate grassland soil samples, focusing on how different databases, classifiers, and sequencing methods influence the results. Our study underscores the crucial need for a harmonized taxonomic database that could greatly enhance comparability and accuracy in the understanding of soil microbiomes.
微生物在土壤功能中发挥着重要作用,支撑着粮食生产系统并提供一系列重要的生态系统服务。为了阐明这些微生物与生态系统功能之间的关系,准确识别和分类土壤微生物至关重要。我们通过对爱尔兰各地131种不同的温带草原土壤中的土壤微生物群进行分析,评估了鸟枪法测序和扩增子测序方法的可比性。我们从以下几个方面评估了方法的可比性:(i)最丰富门的检测和分类;(ii)它们基于微生物群落区分样本的能力;(iii)它们将微生物群落与测得的氮循环功能联系起来的能力。我们的研究结果表明,两种方法都提供了适度相似的结果,对主要门的检测一致,微生物群落分化模式相似,并且在很大程度上确定了门与氮功能之间的相同关系。两种方法之间观察到的差异大多与参考分类法的选择差异有关。扩增子测序是一种经济高效、计算要求较低的选择,而鸟枪法测序提供了更深层次的分类分辨率并能访问最新数据库,使其适用于详细的微生物分析。我们的研究强调了根据项目要求、数据库可用性和财务资源仔细选择方法的必要性。
重要性 研究土壤中的微生物仍然是一项挑战,因为土壤是最复杂和多样的环境之一。使这些挑战更加复杂 的是土壤中缺乏可培养的代表物种,超过99%的土壤微生物尚未在实验室环境中培养出来。利用绕过传统依赖培养方法的下一代测序技术,科学家现在能够获得低成本、高通量的DNA测序,甚至可以检测样本中最罕见的微生物。本研究严格比较了扩增子测序和鸟枪法测序技术在分析不同温带草原土壤样本中的微生物群落方面的情况,重点关注不同的数据库、分类器和测序方法如何影响结果。我们的研究强调了迫切需要一个统一的分类数据库,这可以大大提高在理解土壤微生物群落方面的可比性和准确性。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-2
Microb Ecol. 2025-6-20
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2025-6-18
Environ Microbiome. 2024-3-28
NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2024-3-11
Nat Biotechnol. 2024-5
Nat Microbiol. 2022-10
mBio. 2022-10-26