Duan Yanping, Yang Min, Wang Yanping, Cheng Shishi, Liang Wei, Lippke Sonia, Zhang Shiping, Chen Li
Department of Sports and Health Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;25(1):2145. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23311-0.
The effectiveness of a blended approach integrating face-to-face and eHealth interventions for promoting positive lifestyle behaviours in older adults has not been systematically tested. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of such interventions in improving health behaviours and outcomes among older adults in Hong Kong.
A 10-week, single-blind, randomized controlled trial recruited 132 eligible older adults. Participants were assigned to three groups: (1) a blended intervention group: two sessions per week for ten weeks with one for physical activity and one for diet (fruit and vegetable intake; meat, fish, egg and alternatives intake) and two web-based sessions; (2) a face-to-face intervention group: same content and intensity like the blended group but as face-to-face sessions; and (3) a control group receiving biweekly telephone calls. Data on lifestyle behaviours and health outcomes (physical fitness, depression, loneliness, health-related quality of life) were collected at baseline (T1), 10 weeks post-test (T2), and a 3-month follow-up (T3). All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 29.0. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the feasibility. The generalized linear mixed models were used to evaluate the effects of the intervention.
The study demonstrated high feasibility with > 90% adherence, > 88% session attendance, and an acceptability score of 4.7/5. The blended intervention outperformed the face-to-face and control conditions for both diet behaviours at T2 and T3, with a Cohen's d effect size ranging from 0.77 to 1.18 (p < 0.05). It also showed a significant effect on physical activity compared to controls at T3 (Cohen's d = 0.21, p < 0.05). Both intervention groups improved in lower body strength, agility and dynamic balance, and health-related quality of life compared to control at T3 (p < 0.05).
This study provides empirical evidence for the feasibility and superiority of blended interventions to promote dietary habits among Hong Kong older adults. Future research applying rigorous study design, identifying effective strategies promoting physical activity, and exploring psychological mechanisms of health behaviour changes is warranted to enhance the efficacy of lifestyle interventions among older adults.
This study was retrospectively registered on the ISRCTN (ISRCTN32329348).
将面对面干预和电子健康干预相结合以促进老年人积极生活方式行为的综合方法的有效性尚未得到系统测试。本研究旨在评估此类干预措施在改善香港老年人健康行为和健康结果方面的可行性和有效性。
一项为期10周的单盲随机对照试验招募了132名符合条件的老年人。参与者被分为三组:(1)综合干预组:每周两次,为期十周,一次针对体育活动,一次针对饮食(水果和蔬菜摄入量;肉类、鱼类、蛋类及替代食物摄入量),并进行两次基于网络的课程;(2)面对面干预组:内容和强度与综合组相同,但为面对面课程;(3)对照组,每两周接受一次电话随访。在基线(T1)、测试后10周(T2)和3个月随访(T3)时收集生活方式行为和健康结果(身体素质、抑郁、孤独感、健康相关生活质量)的数据。所有数据均使用IBM SPSS 29.0进行分析。描述性统计用于描述可行性。广义线性混合模型用于评估干预效果。
该研究显示出高可行性,依从性>90%,课程出勤率>88%,可接受性评分为4.7/5。在T2和T3时,综合干预在饮食行为方面均优于面对面干预组和对照组,科恩d效应量范围为0.77至1.18(p<0.05)。与对照组相比,在T3时,综合干预对体育活动也有显著影响(科恩d=0.21,p<0.05)。与对照组相比,在T3时,两个干预组的下肢力量、敏捷性和动态平衡以及健康相关生活质量均有所改善(p<0.05)。
本研究为综合干预在促进香港老年人饮食习惯方面的可行性和优越性提供了实证依据。未来有必要开展应用严谨研究设计的研究,确定促进体育活动的有效策略,并探索健康行为改变的心理机制,以提高老年人生活方式干预的效果。
本研究在国际标准随机对照试验编号注册库(ISRCTN32329348)上进行了回顾性注册。