Aminu Kafayat, Aladelusi Timothy Olukunle, Salami Afeez Abolarinwa, Omoleke Semeeh Akinwale, Ezeagu Chiamaka Norah, Murererehe Julienne, Olomo Charles Adetokunbo, Amzat Jimoh, Uwambaye Peace, Adisa Akinyele Olumuyiwa, Kanmodi Kehinde Kazeem
Department of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Campaign for Head and Neck Cancer Education (CHANCE) Programme, Cephas Health Research Initiative Inc, Ibadan, Nigeria.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 10;25(1):2151. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23350-7.
Due to the persistently rising prevalence of oral sex practices across the world, oral sex is now a global health issue. So far, different health trials have been conducted in an attempt to curb the health risks associated with oral sex practices. However, no known study has mapped the scope, outcomes, and limitations of these trials. Hence, this global scoping review aimed to map the existing evidence.
This scoping review was reported using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. On 7th April 2024, we conducted a systematic search of eight research databases and reviewed all trials that met the review's inclusion criteria. The narrative synthesis approach was used in the collation, summarization, and reporting of the data extracted from the included trials.
Only 15 relevant articles were included in the review and 11 of these were conducted in the USA. 33% of the reviewed studies employed a randomized control trial (RCT) design. None of the reviewed trials focused solely on oral sex practices, as they also investigated other sexual practices. The sample size of the reviewed trials ranged between 80 and 1543 with an average sample size of 506.7 per trial, while 53% of the trials focused on women and girls. Only six of the 15 trials reported baseline sexual behaviour which showed the heterogeneity of risky sexual practices, including oral sex, in different populations and contexts. Regarding behavioural modifications post-intervention, findings from the review mostly noted modification to sexual behaviours in the intervention groups, signifying intervention efficacy. However, common limitations of the reviewed trials, include reliance on self-reported data without other means of verification, limited generalizability of findings and short or no follow-up periods.
Worldwide, there is a paucity of health trials on oral sex practices. Despite methodological limitations, these trials reported mixed results, with the majority demonstrating positive changes in attitudes towards oral sex. Finally, there is a need for multi-country RCTs that are focused on oral sex practices, to ensure future policies related to oral sexual health are based on trials that are more rigorous, credible, and generalizable.
由于全球范围内口交行为的患病率持续上升,口交如今已成为一个全球性的健康问题。到目前为止,已经开展了不同的健康试验,试图遏制与口交行为相关的健康风险。然而,尚无已知研究梳理这些试验的范围、结果和局限性。因此,这项全球范围综述旨在梳理现有证据。
本范围综述按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告。2024年4月7日,我们对八个研究数据库进行了系统检索,并审查了所有符合综述纳入标准的试验。采用叙述性综合方法对纳入试验中提取的数据进行整理、汇总和报告。
该综述仅纳入了15篇相关文章,其中11篇在美国进行。33%的综述研究采用了随机对照试验(RCT)设计。所有综述试验均未仅聚焦于口交行为,因为它们还调查了其他性行为。综述试验的样本量在80至1543之间,平均每个试验的样本量为506.7,同时53%的试验聚焦于女性和女孩。15项试验中只有6项报告了基线性行为,这显示了不同人群和背景下包括口交在内的危险性行为的异质性。关于干预后的行为改变,综述结果大多指出干预组性行为有改变,表明干预有效。然而,综述试验的常见局限性包括依赖自我报告数据而无其他验证手段、研究结果的可推广性有限以及随访期短或无随访。
在全球范围内,关于口交行为的健康试验匮乏。尽管存在方法学上的局限性,但这些试验报告的结果不一,多数显示对口交态度有积极变化。最后,需要开展专注于口交行为的多国随机对照试验,以确保未来与口交性健康相关的政策基于更严谨、可信且可推广的试验。