Still we rise: research on bias and discrimination will endure.

This is a commentary on Reisner et al's Analyzing multiple types of discrimination using implicit and explicit measures, comparing target vs. Dominant groups, in a study of smoking/vaping among community health center members in Boston, Massachusetts (2020-2022). This manuscript is a study of the intersection of multiple forms of discrimination-racism, sexism, heterosexism, cissexism, ageism, and sizeism-and measures of implicit and explicit bias in the context of current smoking and vaping behavior among patients from targeted versus dominant groups at community health centers in Boston, Massachusetts (USA) from 2020 to 2022. The authors used logistic regression to assess smoking and vaping behavior with each type of discrimination, and then extended this analysis employing a meta-regression approach to better understand relationships across all types of discrimination under consideration in their study. Recently, the grant from the US National Institutes of Health, which supported this research was terminated in progress for ideological reasons by the current US administration under President Donald J. Trump for simply focusing on discrimination. While this study was among the first to be terminated by the Trump administration, hundreds of grants from the NIH and other US research funders have been cancelled in the first half of 2025. Reisner et al's paper is an important piece of research, but it represents the start of a sophisticated inquiry into discrimination and bias, and future work by this team and in this area of research is necessary and sadly, now impossible to do with federal scientific funding. Work on discrimination and bias has always faced obstacles, but the scope and scale of attacks on science in the US require all scientists to push back against this censorship and political interference in the funding and conduct of research.