Kim So-Young, Kim Meeyoung
Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Soonchunhyang University, Asan 31538, Korea.
Department of Food and Nutrition, Kongju National University, Yesan 32439, Korea.
Nutr Res Pract. 2025 Jun;19(3):453-463. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.453. Epub 2025 May 29.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the nutritional quality of plant-based school meals by comparing plant-based and regular menus in Seoul's elementary schools.
MATERIALS/METHODS: Nutrient information for plant-based and regular menus (Monday-Friday) was collected from school websites during a designated week in June 2023 when plant-based meals were offered. The analysis included 1,526 menus (321 plant-based, 1,205 regular) from 313 of 608 schools. Average energy and nutrient content were calculated for both menu types, along with the proportion of schools meeting the nutritional standards for school meals provided by the Ministry of Education in South Korea. Statistical analyses included χ tests, Fisher's exact test, and -tests (α = 0.05).
Analysis of energy and nutrient content in both menu types revealed that all nutrients, except vitamin C, met or exceeded the nutritional standards for school meals. However, plant-based menus provided significantly lower levels of energy, protein, fat, thiamine, and vitamin C, and higher levels of carbohydrates, calcium, and iron compared to regular menus. While the macronutrient energy distributions of both menu types were within recommended ranges, plant-based menus tended to have higher carbohydrate ratios and lower protein and fat ratios. Furthermore, schools were more likely to serve plant-based menus that fell short of the nutritional standards for several nutrients. Some plant-based menus were identified as nutritionally unbalanced, revealing fundamental shortcomings in menu design-particularly an overreliance on carbohydrate- and fat-rich foods as staples, side dishes, and desserts, as well as frequent use of oil-based cooking methods.
Overall, these findings suggest a need for review and re-examination of the nutritional aspects of plant-based menus currently served in Seoul's elementary school meals.
背景/目的:本研究旨在通过比较首尔小学的植物性和常规菜单,评估植物性学校膳食的营养质量。
材料/方法:2023年6月指定的一周内,当学校提供植物性膳食时,从学校网站收集了植物性和常规菜单(周一至周五)的营养信息。分析包括来自608所学校中313所学校的1526份菜单(321份植物性,1205份常规)。计算了两种菜单类型的平均能量和营养成分含量,以及达到韩国教育部规定的学校膳食营养标准的学校比例。统计分析包括卡方检验、费舍尔精确检验和t检验(α = 0.05)。
对两种菜单类型的能量和营养成分分析表明,除维生素C外,所有营养素均达到或超过学校膳食的营养标准。然而,与常规菜单相比,植物性菜单的能量、蛋白质、脂肪、硫胺素和维生素C含量显著较低,碳水化合物、钙和铁含量较高。虽然两种菜单类型的宏量营养素能量分布均在推荐范围内,但植物性菜单的碳水化合物比例往往较高,蛋白质和脂肪比例较低。此外,学校更有可能提供几种营养素未达营养标准的植物性菜单。一些植物性菜单被认定为营养不均衡,揭示了菜单设计中的根本缺陷,特别是过度依赖富含碳水化合物和脂肪的食物作为主食、配菜和甜点,以及频繁使用油基烹饪方法。
总体而言,这些发现表明有必要重新审视和检查首尔小学目前提供的植物性菜单的营养方面。