• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肉类消费与肥胖:一种减少健康不平等的气候友好型方式。

Meat consumption and obesity: A climate-friendly way to reduce health inequalities.

作者信息

Sares-Jäske Laura, Tapanainen Heli, Valsta Liisa, Haario Peppi, Männistö Satu, Vaalavuo Maria

机构信息

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare Helsinki Finland.

出版信息

Public Health Chall. 2024 Mar 15;3(1):e163. doi: 10.1002/puh2.163. eCollection 2024 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/puh2.163
PMID:40497066
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12060756/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Climate change, health inequalities and obesity are considerable public health challenges of the 21st century. Red and processed meat (RPM) consumption is associated with an increased risk of obesity and with higher climate impact. At the same time, educational inequalities exist not only in RPM consumption and obesity but also in other health behaviours. Thus, we investigated whether educational inequalities exist in the association between RPM consumption and obesity, while also considering health behaviours (physical activity, vegetable, legume and fruit consumption, alcohol consumption and smoking) as potential confounding and effect modifying factors.

METHODS

The FinHealth 2017 Study data, including 4494 participants aged 18-74 years, were used. A validated food frequency questionnaire was employed to determine dietary intake. Height and weight were measured by trained study nurses. Linear and logistic regression models were used.

RESULTS

Odds of obesity increased along with RPM consumption in women ( < 0.001) and men ( < 0.001) and in each educational group regardless of other unfavourable health behaviours. Only in men with basic education were the differences between RPM consumption categories not statistically significant. Compared to those with high education and the lowest RPM consumption, those with basic education and the highest RPM consumption had multiple odds of obesity (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) among women: 7.5 (2.7-20.4); among men: 5.3 (2.5-11.1)).

CONCLUSION

High RPM consumption appears to be associated with obesity independently of other unfavourable health behaviours or education, yet the odds are higher with basic education. Targeting unhealthy dietary patterns with heavy ecological burden could help reduce both health inequalities and mitigate climate change.

摘要

背景

气候变化、健康不平等和肥胖是21世纪相当严峻的公共卫生挑战。红肉和加工肉类(RPM)的消费与肥胖风险增加以及更高的气候影响相关。与此同时,教育不平等不仅存在于RPM消费和肥胖方面,还存在于其他健康行为中。因此,我们调查了RPM消费与肥胖之间的关联中是否存在教育不平等,同时将健康行为(体育活动、蔬菜、豆类和水果消费、饮酒和吸烟)视为潜在的混杂因素和效应修饰因素。

方法

使用了2017年芬兰健康研究数据,包括4494名年龄在18 - 74岁之间的参与者。采用经过验证的食物频率问卷来确定饮食摄入量。身高和体重由经过培训的研究护士测量。使用线性和逻辑回归模型。

结果

无论其他不利健康行为如何,女性(<0.001)和男性(<0.001)以及每个教育组中,肥胖几率都随着RPM消费的增加而增加。只有在接受基础教育的男性中,RPM消费类别之间的差异没有统计学意义。与受过高等教育且RPM消费最低的人相比,接受基础教育且RPM消费最高的人肥胖几率增加了数倍(女性的优势比(95%置信区间):7.5(2.7 - 20.4);男性:5.3(2.5 - 11.1))。

结论

高RPM消费似乎与肥胖相关,独立于其他不利健康行为或教育因素,但接受基础教育者的肥胖几率更高。针对具有沉重生态负担的不健康饮食模式采取措施,可能有助于减少健康不平等并缓解气候变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3151/12060756/3dc25f37fda0/PUH2-3-e163-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3151/12060756/3a2141194977/PUH2-3-e163-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3151/12060756/3dc25f37fda0/PUH2-3-e163-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3151/12060756/3a2141194977/PUH2-3-e163-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3151/12060756/3dc25f37fda0/PUH2-3-e163-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Meat consumption and obesity: A climate-friendly way to reduce health inequalities.肉类消费与肥胖:一种减少健康不平等的气候友好型方式。
Public Health Chall. 2024 Mar 15;3(1):e163. doi: 10.1002/puh2.163. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Population group differences in subjective importance of meat in diet and red and processed meat consumption.不同人群在饮食中肉类的主观重要性以及红肉和加工肉类消费方面的差异。
Appetite. 2022 Feb 1;169:105836. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105836. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
3
Vegetarians and different types of meat eaters among the Finnish adult population from 2007 to 2017.2007 年至 2017 年芬兰成年人口中的素食者和不同类型的肉食者。
Br J Nutr. 2022 Apr 14;127(7):1060-1072. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521001719. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
4
Are differential consumption patterns in health-related behaviours an explanation for persistent and widening social inequalities in health in England?健康相关行为中的差异消费模式能否解释英国健康方面持续且不断扩大的社会不平等现象?
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Oct 18;15(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0461-2.
5
Examining the interaction of fast-food outlet exposure and income on diet and obesity: evidence from 51,361 UK Biobank participants.研究快餐销售点暴露与收入对饮食和肥胖的交互作用:来自 51361 名英国生物银行参与者的证据。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jul 24;15(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0699-8.
6
Association between red and processed meat consumption and chronic diseases: the confounding role of other dietary factors.红肉和加工肉类消费与慢性病之间的关联:其他饮食因素的混杂作用。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015 Sep;69(9):1060-5. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.63. Epub 2015 May 13.
7
High red and processed meat consumption is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance.高红色和加工肉类的消费与非酒精性脂肪肝和胰岛素抵抗有关。
J Hepatol. 2018 Jun;68(6):1239-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Lung cancer risk and red meat consumption among Iowa women.爱荷华州女性的肺癌风险与红肉消费情况
Lung Cancer. 2001 Oct;34(1):37-46. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5002(01)00227-6.
9
Association of red and processed meat consumption with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in participants with and without obesity: A prospective cohort study.红肉类和加工肉类的摄入与肥胖和非肥胖参与者心血管发病率和死亡率的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Clin Nutr. 2021 May;40(5):3643-3649. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.12.030. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
10
Did social isolation during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic have an impact on the lifestyles of citizens?在 SARS-CoV-2 疫情期间,社交隔离是否对公民的生活方式产生了影响?
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):353-362. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.137.

本文引用的文献

1
The potential of food environment policies to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in diets and to improve healthy diets among lower socioeconomic groups: an umbrella review.食物环境政策在减少饮食方面的社会经济不平等和改善较低社会经济群体健康饮食方面的潜力:伞式审查。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 4;22(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12827-4.
2
Population group differences in subjective importance of meat in diet and red and processed meat consumption.不同人群在饮食中肉类的主观重要性以及红肉和加工肉类消费方面的差异。
Appetite. 2022 Feb 1;169:105836. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105836. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
3
The Association of Plant-Based Diet With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Prospect Cohort Studies.
植物性饮食与心血管疾病及死亡率的关联:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析与系统评价
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 5;8:756810. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.756810. eCollection 2021.
4
The Impact of Vegan Diet in the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.素食饮食在 2 型糖尿病预防和治疗中的影响:系统评价。
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 21;13(6):2123. doi: 10.3390/nu13062123.
5
Sociodemographic differences in motives for food selection: results from the LoCard cross-sectional survey.社会人口学差异对食物选择动机的影响:来自 LoCard 横断面调查的结果。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jun 2;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01139-2.
6
Combined lifestyle factors, all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.综合生活方式因素与全因死亡率和心血管疾病:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021 Jan;75(1):92-99. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-214050. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
7
Socioeconomics of Obesity.肥胖的社会经济学。
Curr Obes Rep. 2020 Sep;9(3):272-279. doi: 10.1007/s13679-020-00398-7.
8
Associations of health literacy with socioeconomic position, health risk behavior, and health status: a large national population-based survey among Danish adults.健康素养与社会经济地位、健康风险行为和健康状况的关联:丹麦成年人的一项大型全国性基于人群的调查。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 28;20(1):565. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08498-8.
9
How to transition to reduced-meat diets that benefit people and the planet.如何过渡到有益于人类和地球的低肉饮食。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 20;718:137208. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137208. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
10
Health risk behaviours and allostatic load: A systematic review.健康风险行为与应激负担:系统综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 Jan;108:694-711. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.12.020. Epub 2019 Dec 14.