School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE1 7RU, UK.
UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 20;718:137208. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137208. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
Overwhelming evidence shows that overconsumption of meat is bad for human and environmental health and that moving towards a more plant-based diet is more sustainable. For instance, replacing beef with beans in the US could free up 42% of US cropland and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 334 mmt, accomplishing 75% of the 2020 carbon reduction target. We summarise the evidence on how overconsumption of meat affects social, environmental and economic sustainability. We highlight the social, environmental and economic effectiveness of a range of dietary interventions that have been tested to date. Because meat eating is embedded within complex cultural, economic, and political systems, dietary shifts to reduce overconsumption are unlikely to happen quickly and a suite of sustained, context-specific interventions is likely to work better than brief, one-dimensional approaches. We conclude with key actions needed by global leaders in politics, industry and the health sector that could help aide this dietary transformation to benefit people and the planet.
大量证据表明,肉类摄入过量对人类和环境健康有害,而转向更植物性的饮食则更具可持续性。例如,用豆类代替美国的牛肉,可以腾出 42%的美国耕地,并减少 334 百万吨的温室气体排放,实现 2020 年碳减排目标的 75%。我们总结了肉类摄入过量如何影响社会、环境和经济可持续性的证据。我们强调了迄今为止经过测试的一系列饮食干预措施在社会、环境和经济方面的有效性。由于吃肉行为嵌入在复杂的文化、经济和政治体系中,减少过度消费的饮食转变不太可能迅速发生,一整套持续的、具体情况的干预措施可能比短暂的、一维的方法更有效。最后,我们总结了全球政治、工业和卫生部门的领导人需要采取的关键行动,这有助于推动这种饮食转变,造福人类和地球。