Suppr超能文献

非增强计算机断层扫描联合或不联合计算机断层扫描血管造影与计算机断层扫描灌注用于急性缺血性卒中患者血管内治疗的选择:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Selection by Noncontrast Computed Tomography With or Without Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Computed Tomography Perfusion for Endovascular Therapy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zhang Yang, Zhao Yang, Deng Bowen, Wu Simiao, Nogueira Raul G, Abdalkader Mohamad, Nagel Simon, Michel Patrik, Qiu Zhongming, Yang Qingwu, Miao Zhongrong, Huo Xiaochuan, Sun Dapeng, Sarraj Amrou, Campbell Bruce C V, Zhao Chuansheng, Chen Wenhuo, Yi Tingyu, Bian Wei, Nguyen Thanh N, Sui Yi, Wang Haiyuan

机构信息

School of Public Health China Medical University Shenyang China.

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery Shenyang First People's Hospital, Shenyang Medical College Affiliated Brain Hospital Shenyang China.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):e038173. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038173. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of imaging selection on endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke remains debated. We compared the efficacy and safety of imaging modalities using computed tomography perfusion with using noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT)±computed tomography angiography.

METHODS

Studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to March 1, 2024, were analyzed. Sixteen studies (12 199 patients) assessed functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days) using odds ratios (ORs). This study was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42024519554).

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in functional independence (OR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.98-1.21]), modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 (OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.88-1.29]), 0 to 3 (OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.92-1.18]), thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b to 3 (OR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.95-1.22]), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.74-1.04]), and any intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.80-1.12]) between the computed tomography perfusion and NCCT group. There was a significantly lower odds of death during follow-up in the computed tomography perfusion group compared with the NCCT group (OR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.70-0.88]). Comparison of modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 significantly favored NCCT selection for patients with large cores (=0.05). Risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane risk assessment tool revealed concerns in 1 randomized control trial, while observational and post hoc studies assessed with Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions I showed moderate (2 studies), serious (11 studies), and critical (2 studies) risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that patients undergoing endovascular therapy selected with computed tomography perfusion had a similar functional prognosis compared with those selected with NCCT but had lower odds of death during follow-up. NCCT-defined large-core patients had better functional outcomes.

摘要

背景

影像学选择对急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗的影响仍存在争议。我们比较了使用计算机断层扫描灌注成像与使用非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)±计算机断层扫描血管造影术的疗效和安全性。

方法

分析了截至2024年3月1日来自PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆的研究。16项研究(12199例患者)使用比值比(OR)评估功能独立性(90天时改良Rankin量表评分为0 - 2)。本研究已在国际系统评价前瞻性注册库(CRD42024519554)注册。

结果

在功能独立性(OR,1.09 [95% CI,0.98 - 1.21])、改良Rankin量表评分为0至1(OR,1.07 [95% CI,0.88 - 1.29])、0至3(OR,1.04 [95% CI,0.92 - 1.18])、脑梗死溶栓2b至3级(OR,1.08 [95% CI,0.95 - 1.22])、症状性颅内出血(OR,0.87 [95% CI,0.74 - 1.04])和任何颅内出血(OR,0.95 [95% CI,0.80 - 1.12])方面,计算机断层扫描灌注组和NCCT组之间未观察到显著差异。与NCCT组相比,计算机断层扫描灌注组随访期间死亡的比值显著更低(OR,0.78 [95% CI,0.70 - 0.88])。对于大梗死核心患者(=0.05),改良Rankin量表评分为0至2的比较显著有利于NCCT选择。使用Cochrane风险评估工具进行的偏倚风险评估显示1项随机对照试验存在问题,而使用干预非随机研究中的偏倚风险评估的观察性研究和事后研究显示存在中度(2项研究)、严重(11项研究)和关键(2项研究)偏倚风险。

结论

这些发现表明,与使用NCCT选择的患者相比,接受计算机断层扫描灌注成像选择进行血管内治疗的患者功能预后相似,但随访期间死亡的比值更低。NCCT定义的大梗死核心患者功能结局更好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验