Stewart Rory K, Kim Honghyok, Choi Hayon Michelle, Song Yimeng, Zhang Yang, Gillingham Kenneth T, Esty Daniel C, Hobbs Benjamin F, Bell Michelle L
School of the Environment, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511, United States.
School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607, United States.
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Jun 24;59(24):11995-12007. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c14326. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
Strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions may provide health benefits through improved air quality, yet these benefits might not be equitably distributed. Understanding these cobenefits and who receives them can aid policymakers in prioritizing mitigation strategies. We investigated four future energy scenarios (port electrification, electric vehicles, natural gas, energy efficiency) and a business-as-usual scenario to determine how changes to ambient fine particle (PM) levels impact health within the contiguous United States (U.S.) by region, race/ethnicity, urbanicity, and income. We also investigated how methodological assumptions affect findings. Our projections of avoided mortalities from energy transition policies range from 67,011 (95% CI: 45,692, 82,397) to 81,003 (55,286, 99,532) in 2050. The monetized health benefits from avoided mortalities and hospitalizations range from $785.8 billion to $949.9 billion/year. These benefits vary by region and subpopulation, with Black, suburban, and less wealthy Americans experiencing higher percent avoided mortality across scenarios. Results were sensitive to assumptions for future concentration-response functions relating pollution levels to health, baseline incidence rates, and population projections. Our findings indicate energy policies transitioning from fossil fuel production in the U.S. provide substantial health and economic benefits that vary across populations and help reduce environmental health inequities in exposure and associated morality.
减少温室气体排放的策略可能通过改善空气质量带来健康益处,但这些益处的分配可能并不公平。了解这些协同效益以及受益者有助于政策制定者确定减排策略的优先级。我们研究了四种未来能源情景(港口电气化、电动汽车、天然气、能源效率)以及一种照常情景,以确定美国本土环境细颗粒物(PM)水平的变化如何按地区、种族/族裔、城市化程度和收入影响健康。我们还研究了方法假设如何影响研究结果。我们对能源转型政策避免的死亡人数的预测在2050年从67,011人(95%置信区间:45,692人,82,397人)到81,003人(55,286人,99,532人)不等。避免死亡和住院所带来的健康效益货币化后每年在7858亿美元到9499亿美元之间。这些效益因地区和亚人群而异,在所有情景中,黑人、郊区居民和较不富裕的美国人避免死亡的比例更高。结果对未来污染水平与健康的浓度 - 反应函数假设、基线发病率和人口预测假设敏感。我们的研究结果表明,美国从化石燃料生产转型的能源政策带来了巨大的健康和经济效益,这些效益因人群而异,有助于减少环境健康在暴露和相关死亡率方面的不平等。