Grotstein J S
Yale J Biol Med. 1985 May-Jun;58(3):299-314.
The Schreber case has been used by generations of psychoanalysts and psychiatrists to exemplify many features of the psychoanalytic conception of psychosis. It has generally been considered the origin of a great debate in psychoanalysis as to whether schizophrenia is a disorder of nature or of nurture. I seek in this contribution to proffer a newer theory of psychopathology, one which is based upon the conception of primary and secondary disorders of attachment (bonding) and which presents itself clinically as disorders of self-regulation and of interactional regulation. I attempt to explicate this theory in the Schreber case by demonstrating that his symptoms revealed: (a) failures of normal mental state regulations, (b) the emergence of symptoms which then secondarily and pathologically restore regulation in a pathological manner, and finally (c) his/her very symptoms seem to regulate a state in the family system and/or in the system of the culture at large.
施雷伯案例被几代精神分析学家和精神病学家用来例证精神病的精神分析概念的诸多特征。它通常被视为精神分析领域一场大辩论的起源,这场辩论围绕精神分裂症是一种天性紊乱还是教养紊乱展开。在本文中,我试图提出一种更新的精神病理学理论,该理论基于依恋(联结)的原发性和继发性障碍的概念,在临床上表现为自我调节和互动调节的障碍。我试图通过证明施雷伯的症状揭示了以下几点,在施雷伯案例中阐释这一理论:(a)正常心理状态调节的失败;(b)症状的出现,这些症状随后以病理方式继发性地、病态地恢复调节;最后(c)他/她的症状似乎在调节家庭系统和/或整个文化系统中的一种状态。