Ikemura Nobuhiro, Spertus John A, Cho Yoon Joo, Jones Philip G, Jawad Mohammad Abdel, O'Keefe Evan L, Chan Paul S
UMKC Healthcare Institute for Innovations in Quality, Kansas City, MO, USA; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO, USA; Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Internal Medicine, Tachikawa Hospital, Tachikawa, Japan.
UMKC Healthcare Institute for Innovations in Quality, Kansas City, MO, USA; Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Resuscitation. 2025 Sep;214:110671. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110671. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
Body mass index (BMI), a key clinical marker, may influence outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), but its association with neurologically favorable survival remains unclear.
Within Get With The Guidelines®-Resuscitation, we analyzed 56,411 IHCA patients with BMI data during 2006-2012. BMI was classified as underweight (<18.5 kg/m), normal (18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), obese (30.0-34.9), and very obese (≥35.0). Multivariable hierarchical models with hospital as a random effect assessed the association between BMI and favorable neurological survival (discharge cerebral performance category score of 1) and survival to discharge.
Among 10,219 patients with a shockable rhythm, 3014 (29.4%) had favorable neurological survival, and 3,964 (38.7%) survived to discharge. After adjustment, compared with normal BMI patients, underweight patients had lower favorable neurological survival (OR 0.64 [95%CI: 0.49-0.84]), while overweight (OR 1.17 [1.04-1.33]) and obese (OR 1.16 [1.00-1.34]) patients had higher rates of favorable neurological survival; no difference was seen for very obese patients (OR 1.06 [0.91-1.24]). A similar pattern was observed for survival to discharge. Among 46,192 patients with a non-shockable arrest rhythm, 4844 (10.4%) had favorable neurological survival, and 7,331 (15.8%) survived to discharge. After adjustment, all BMI groups had similar rates of favorable neurological survival and survival to discharge, except for underweight patients (OR 0.76 [0.66-0.89] and 0.85 [0.75-0.95], respectively).
For patients with IHCA, underweight patients had lower rates of survival and favorable neurological survival, regardless of initial cardiac arrest rhythm. In contrast, overweight and obese patients had better outcomes only when the initial rhythm was shockable.
体重指数(BMI)作为一项关键的临床指标,可能会影响院内心脏骤停(IHCA)后的预后,但它与神经功能良好的生存之间的关联仍不明确。
在“遵循指南®-复苏”项目中,我们分析了2006年至2012年间56411例有BMI数据的院内心脏骤停患者。BMI被分为体重过轻(<18.5kg/m²)、正常(18.5-24.9)、超重(25.0-29.9)、肥胖(30.0-34.9)和极度肥胖(≥35.0)。以医院为随机效应的多变量分层模型评估了BMI与神经功能良好的生存(出院时脑功能分类评分为1)和出院生存之间的关联。
在10219例可电击心律的患者中,3014例(29.4%)有神经功能良好的生存,3964例(38.7%)存活至出院。调整后,与BMI正常的患者相比,体重过轻的患者神经功能良好的生存率较低(比值比[OR]0.64[95%置信区间:0.49-0.84]),而超重(OR1.17[1.04-1.33])和肥胖(OR1.16[1.00-1.34])患者神经功能良好的生存率较高;极度肥胖患者未见差异(OR1.06[0.91-1.24])。出院生存也观察到类似模式。在46192例不可电击心律的心脏骤停患者中,4844例(10.4%)有神经功能良好的生存,7331例(15.8%)存活至出院。调整后,除体重过轻的患者外(分别为OR0.76[0.66-0.89]和0.85[0.75-0.95]),所有BMI组神经功能良好的生存率和出院生存率相似。
对于院内心脏骤停患者,无论初始心脏骤停心律如何,体重过轻的患者生存率和神经功能良好的生存率较低。相比之下,超重和肥胖患者仅在初始心律可电击时预后较好。