• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从禁欲到援助:反生育主义对生殖利他主义原则的意外支持。

From Abstinence to Assistance: Antinatalism's Unexpected Endorsement of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.

作者信息

Teo Marcus T L

机构信息

Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Bioethics. 2025 Sep;39(7):693-699. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13432. Epub 2025 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1111/bioe.13432
PMID:40500975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12392239/
Abstract

This essay begins from the point that developments in antinatalism, or the view that it is wrong to bear children, place legitimate pressures on prospective parents to seriously consider the harms of bringing their prospective children into existence. This essay does not defend antinatalism but instead considers an upshot of bioethical import if one takes these antinatalist pressures seriously. Attending to the debate on the normative legitimacy of Savulescu's Principle of Procreative Beneficence (PPB), I argue that antinatalist pressures give rise to reasons that count in favor of the PPB. I show how an antinatalist-corollary version of the PPB might be derived and how we might respond to the PPB's main criticisms and conceptual difficulties.

摘要

本文从这样一个观点出发

反生育主义(即认为生育孩子是错误的观点)的发展给准父母带来了合理压力,促使他们认真考虑将未来的孩子带到世上所带来的危害。本文并不为反生育主义辩护,而是探讨如果有人认真对待这些反生育主义压力,会产生的一个具有生物伦理重要性的结果。关注关于萨夫勒斯库的生殖利他主义原则(PPB)规范合法性的辩论,我认为反生育主义压力产生了支持PPB的理由。我展示了如何推导PPB的反生育主义推论版本,以及我们如何回应PPB的主要批评和概念难题。

相似文献

1
From Abstinence to Assistance: Antinatalism's Unexpected Endorsement of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.从禁欲到援助:反生育主义对生殖利他主义原则的意外支持。
Bioethics. 2025 Sep;39(7):693-699. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13432. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
4
The principle of procreative beneficence and its implications for genetic engineering.生殖慈善原则及其对基因工程的启示。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2022 Dec;43(5-6):307-328. doi: 10.1007/s11017-022-09585-0. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
5
123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-FDG-PET imaging for diagnosing neuroblastoma.用于诊断神经母细胞瘤的123I-间碘苄胍闪烁扫描术和18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 29;2015(9):CD009263. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009263.pub2.
6
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
9
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
10
Antioxidants for male subfertility.用于男性生育力低下的抗氧化剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(12):CD007411. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007411.pub3. Epub 2014 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Best to possibly not be: A prudential argument for antinatalism.最好不要:反生育主义的审慎论据。
Bioethics. 2024 Oct;38(8):722-727. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13330. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
2
Imposing a Lifestyle: A New Argument for Antinatalism.强加一种生活方式:反生育主义的新论据。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Apr;33(2):238-259. doi: 10.1017/S0963180123000385. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
3
Exit Duty Generator.出口责任发生器
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Apr;33(2):217-231. doi: 10.1017/S096318012300004X. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
4
If You Must Give Them a Gift, Then Give Them the Gift of Nonexistence.如果一定要送他们礼物,那就送他们虚无的礼物吧。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2024 Jan;33(1):48-59. doi: 10.1017/S0963180122000317. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
5
Procreative Beneficence and Genome Editing.生殖性友善与基因编辑
Am J Bioeth. 2022 Sep;22(9):20-22. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2105435.
6
The principle of procreative beneficence and its implications for genetic engineering.生殖慈善原则及其对基因工程的启示。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2022 Dec;43(5-6):307-328. doi: 10.1007/s11017-022-09585-0. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
7
The Case Against the Case for Procreative Beneficence (PB).对生殖性仁爱(PB)之论据的反驳
Bioethics. 2016 Sep;30(7):490-9. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12253. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
8
Procreative Beneficence, Intelligence, and the Optimization Problem.生殖善念、智力与优化问题。
J Med Philos. 2015 Dec;40(6):653-68. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhv026. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
9
Is there a moral obligation to select healthy children?选择健康的孩子有道德义务吗?
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):696-700. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102400. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
10
Procreative altruism: beyond individualism in reproductive selection.生殖利他主义:超越生殖选择中的个人主义
J Med Philos. 2013 Aug;38(4):400-19. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jht022.