Suppr超能文献

特发性肺纤维化内型中的多基因风险与罕见变异

Polygenic Risk and Rare Variants in Endotypes of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

作者信息

Duckworth Anna, Jackson Leigh, Green Harry, Khan Atlas, Wang Chen, Condescu Andrew, Hawkes Gareth, Noth Imre, Martinez Fernando J, Raghu Ganesh, Newton Chad A, Moll Matthew, Cho Michael, Gibbons Michael, Scotton Chris J, Kiryluk Krzysztof, Garcia Christine Kim, Zhang David

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

NIHR Exeter Biomedical Research Centre, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2025 Jun 4:2025.05.22.25328177. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.22.25328177.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and telomere length (TL) are both strongly linked to rare and common genetic variation. Shortened TL itself may be causal for IPF. Whether rare and common variants compete or cooperate to confer genetic risk of IPF uniformly is unknown.

METHODS

We used whole genome sequencing (WGS) data from a discovery case-control cohort sequenced at Columbia (777 IPF, 2905 controls) and validated findings using WGS data from Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed, 1148 IPF, 5202 controls) and the UK Biobank (UKBB, 2739 IPF, 395331 controls). In all cohorts, we identified rare damaging variants in disease-associated genes and computed control-normalized polygenic risk scores for IPF (IPF-PRS) and telomere length (TL-PRS). Telomere length of blood leukocytes was measured using a qPCR assay for two cohorts. We determined the association of the rs35705950 polymorphism, an IPF-PRS excluding (IPF-PRS-no), and a TL-PRS with IPF risk in the overall cohort and in subgroups stratified by genetic endotypes (rare variant carriers, non-carriers stratified by TL cutoffs). We calculated cross-validated area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) and compared the liability of IPF explained by genetic variables.

FINDINGS

We identified independent associations between IPF risk and rare variants, the SNP, and both polygenic scores in the discovery cohort and replicated these findings in the TOPMed and UKBB cohorts. The adjusted effect size of the TL-PRS, which includes >180 SNPs not previously associated with IPF, was comparable to the IPF-PRS-no in the discovery (OR 1.63 [95% CI 1.47, 1.81] vs. OR 1.60 [1.44, 1.77]) and replication cohorts (TOPMed OR 1.47 [1.36, 1.59] vs. OR 1.37 [1.25, 1.50]; UKBB OR 1.24 [1.19, 1.29] vs. OR 1.25 [1.21, 1.30]). The TL-PRS incrementally improved disease prediction beyond known IPF common and rare genetic predictors and clinical variables in discovery (combined AUC: 0.89, p = 0.006), TOPMed (combined AUC: 0.89, p = 0.01), and UKBB cohorts (combined AUC: 0.77, p = 0.03). Rare and common variants jointly contributed to genetic liability of IPF. The TL-PRS increased liability of IPF explained by 13% in the discovery cohort and 8% and 13% in the TOPMed and UKBB cohorts, respectively. In IPF subjects with damaging rare variants, the TL-PRS was consistently associated with disease risk whereas the IPF-PRS-no was not. The TL-PRS also conferred nominally greater odds of disease risk than the IPF-PRS-no in patients with shorter TL, in the discovery and UKBB cohorts. Together, 23-43% of IPF cases have damaging rare variants or telomeres <10 percentile, where the TL-PRS represents a major unrecognized genetic risk factor.

INTERPRETATION

Common and rare genetic variation confer context-specific genetic risk in IPF competitively and cooperatively. In contrast to known IPF common risk variants, the TL-PRS, which includes >180 genetic loci not previously associated with IPF, increases the risk of disease specifically in certain IPF endotypes. Polygenic risk from telomere-associated common variants is a key feature of IPF genetic heterogeneity.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health (NIH), Medical Research Council (MRC), National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).

摘要

背景

特发性肺纤维化(IPF)和端粒长度(TL)均与罕见及常见的基因变异密切相关。TL缩短本身可能是IPF的病因。罕见和常见变异是相互竞争还是协同作用以统一赋予IPF遗传风险尚不清楚。

方法

我们使用了在哥伦比亚测序的发现病例对照队列的全基因组测序(WGS)数据(777例IPF,2905例对照),并使用精准医学跨组学(TOPMed,1148例IPF,5202例对照)和英国生物银行(UKBB,2739例IPF,395331例对照)的WGS数据验证了研究结果。在所有队列中,我们在疾病相关基因中鉴定出罕见的有害变异,并计算了IPF(IPF-PRS)和端粒长度(TL-PRS)的对照标准化多基因风险评分。使用qPCR测定法测量了两个队列中血液白细胞的端粒长度。我们在总体队列以及按遗传内型分层的亚组(罕见变异携带者、按TL临界值分层的非携带者)中确定了rs35705950多态性、排除的IPF-PRS(IPF-PRS-no)和TL-PRS与IPF风险的关联。我们计算了受试者工作特征曲线下的交叉验证面积(AUC),并比较了遗传变量所解释的IPF易感性。

结果

我们在发现队列中确定了IPF风险与罕见变异、单核苷酸多态性(SNP)以及两个多基因评分之间的独立关联,并在TOPMed和UKBB队列中重复了这些发现。TL-PRS的调整效应大小(包括>180个先前未与IPF相关的SNP)在发现队列(比值比[OR]1.63[95%置信区间(CI)1.47,1.81]与OR 1.60[1.44,1.77])和重复队列(TOPMed:OR 1.47[1.36,1.59]与OR 1.37[1.25,1.50];UKBB:OR 1.24[1.19,1.29]与OR 1.25[1.21,1.30])中与IPF-PRS-no相当。TL-PRS在发现队列(综合AUC:0.89,p = 0.006)、TOPMed队列(综合AUC:0.89,p = 0.01)和UKBB队列(综合AUC:0.77,p = 0.03)中,在已知的IPF常见和罕见遗传预测因子及临床变量之外,逐步改善了疾病预测。罕见和常见变异共同促成了IPF的遗传易感性。TL-PRS在发现队列中使IPF的易感性增加了13%,在TOPMed和UKBB队列中分别增加了8%和13%。在具有有害罕见变异的IPF受试者中,TL-PRS始终与疾病风险相关,而IPF-PRS-no则不然。在发现队列和UKBB队列中,TL-PRS在TL较短的患者中也比IPF-PRS-no名义上赋予了更高的疾病风险几率。总之,23 - 43%的IPF病例具有有害的罕见变异或端粒<第10百分位数,其中TL-PRS是一个主要的未被认识的遗传风险因素。

解读

常见和罕见遗传变异在IPF中以竞争和协同的方式赋予特定背景下的遗传风险。与已知的IPF常见风险变异不同,TL-PRS包括>180个先前未与IPF相关的基因座,它特别在某些IPF内型中增加了疾病风险。来自端粒相关常见变异的多基因风险是IPF遗传异质性的一个关键特征。

资助

美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)、医学研究理事会(MRC)、国家健康与照护研究所(NIHR)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5188/12155034/e1adabd6ccb6/nihpp-2025.05.22.25328177v2-f0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验