• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术室与介入放射科进行化疗端口植入的结局比较:一项回顾性观察研究。

Comparison of outcomes for chemo-port implantation performed in the operating room and interventional radiology suite: a retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Park Yong-Man, Lee Donghyoun, Jo Jaemin, Chang Won-Bae

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Surgery, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University College of Medicine, Jeju, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Jun;108(6):362-366. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.108.6.362. Epub 2025 Jun 2.

DOI:10.4174/astr.2025.108.6.362
PMID:40503263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12149993/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Chemo-port insertion is performed by a radiologist or surgeon in an interventional radiology (IR) suite or an operating room (OR). The complication rate is approximately 3%-4%. However, there is still a lack of data for comparison when it is performed in different conditions such as IR suite and OR.

METHODS

This study is for the safety of adult cancer patients after chemo-port implantation by comparing postoperative complication types and rates in different places. Among 375 patients who underwent chemo-port implantation, 203 patients underwent chemo-port implantation by radiologists in an IR suite, and 172 patients underwent the procedure by general surgeons in an OR. In both groups, early and late mortality were investigated. Early and late complication types and rates were also compared, and our study results were compared to the literature.

RESULTS

Patients' characteristics showed no differences. Mortality after the procedure was 39 in OR 72 in IR (P < 0.01). Early mortality at 7 days was 1 in IR, no patient in OR (P = 0.36). Catheter problems did not show a statistical difference in these 2 groups (1.16% 0.49%, P = 0.47). Venous thrombosis happened in 4 and 7 (2.33% 3.45%, P = 0.13), and the central line bloodstream infection was in 5 patients and 6 patients (2.91% . 2.96%, P = 0.98), respectively. Skin problems were 6 and 7 (3.49% 3.45%, P = 0.98). Port site infection happened in 6 patients in each group (3.49% 2.96%, P = 0.77).

CONCLUSION

Chemo-port implantation can be performed in OR or IR without difference in complication rates.

摘要

目的

化疗端口植入术由放射科医生或外科医生在介入放射学(IR)套房或手术室(OR)中进行。并发症发生率约为3%-4%。然而,在诸如IR套房和手术室等不同条件下进行该手术时,仍缺乏用于比较的数据。

方法

本研究旨在通过比较不同地点术后并发症的类型和发生率,探讨成年癌症患者化疗端口植入后的安全性。在375例行化疗端口植入术的患者中,203例由放射科医生在IR套房进行,172例由普通外科医生在手术室进行。对两组患者的早期和晚期死亡率进行调查。同时比较早期和晚期并发症的类型和发生率,并将我们的研究结果与文献进行比较。

结果

患者特征无差异。术后死亡率在手术室组为39例,在IR套房组为72例(P<0.01)。术后7天的早期死亡率在IR套房组为1例,手术室组无患者死亡(P=0.36)。两组导管问题无统计学差异(1.16%对0.49%,P=0.47)。静脉血栓形成分别发生4例和7例(2.33%对3.45%,P=0.13),中心静脉导管相关血流感染分别发生5例和6例(2.91%对2.96%,P=0.98)。皮肤问题分别发生6例和7例(3.49%对3.45%,P=0.98)。两组端口部位感染均发生6例(3.49%对2.96%,P=0.77)。

结论

化疗端口植入术在手术室或IR套房进行,并发症发生率无差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of outcomes for chemo-port implantation performed in the operating room and interventional radiology suite: a retrospective observational study.手术室与介入放射科进行化疗端口植入的结局比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2025 Jun;108(6):362-366. doi: 10.4174/astr.2025.108.6.362. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Cost and Morbidity Analysis of Chest Port Insertion: Interventional Radiology Suite Versus Operating Room.胸部端口置入的成本与发病率分析:介入放射科手术室与手术室对比
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jun;12(6):563-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.01.012.
3
Interventional Radiologists Achieve Equivalent Outcomes and Lower Costs for Totally Implantable Venous Access Device Placement Compared to Operating Room Placement.与手术室相比,介入放射科医生在完全植入式静脉接入装置的放置方面取得了等效的结果和更低的成本。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022 Oct;33(10):1184-1190. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
4
Equivalent success and complication rates of tunneled common femoral venous catheter placed in the interventional suite vs. at patient bedside.在介入治疗室与患者床边放置隧道式股总静脉导管的成功率和并发症发生率相当。
Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Jun;48(6):889-894. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4090-3. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients.外周静脉输液港:109例患者的结果分析
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2000 May-Jun;23(3):187-93. doi: 10.1007/s002700010041.
6
Cost and morbidity analysis of chest port insertion in adults: Outpatient clinic operating room placement.成人胸部端口置入的成本与发病率分析:门诊手术室安置
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2017 Jul 25;21:81-84. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2017.07.056. eCollection 2017 Sep.
7
Arm placement of the Cook titanium Petite Vital-Port: results of radiologic placement in 125 patients with cancer.库克钛制小型生命通道的手臂放置:125例癌症患者的放射学放置结果
Can Assoc Radiol J. 2000 Jun;51(3):163-9.
8
Evaluation of radiologically implanted central venous port systems explanted due to complications.对因并发症而取出的放射学植入式中心静脉导管系统的评估。
J Vasc Access. 2011 Oct-Dec;12(4):306-12. doi: 10.5301/JVA.2011.7739.
9
Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.小儿人群中低调可植入式静脉通路端口的放射学放置
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2001 Nov-Dec;24(6):395-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-001-0071-1. Epub 2001 Nov 8.
10
Combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy guided port catheter implantation--high success and low complication rate.超声与荧光透视联合引导下的端口导管植入术——高成功率和低并发症发生率。
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Mar;69(3):517-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.10.018.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Chemoport-associated Complications and Its Management.化疗端口相关并发症及其管理。
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;11(3):394-397. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01067-w. Epub 2020 May 3.
3
Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices: A Review of Complications and Management Strategies.完全植入式静脉通路装置:并发症及管理策略综述
Am J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;40(1):94-105. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000361.
4
Totally implantable central venous catheters of the port-a-cath type: complications due to its use in the treatment of cancer patients.端口型完全植入式中心静脉导管:其在癌症患者治疗中使用引起的并发症
J BUON. 2014 Jul-Sep;19(3):842-6.
5
Totally implantable venous access devices: retrospective analysis of different insertion techniques and predictors of complications in 796 devices implanted in a single institution.完全植入式静脉通路装置:对单一机构植入的796例装置的不同插入技术及并发症预测因素的回顾性分析
BMC Surg. 2014 May 8;14:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-27.
6
Management of infections related to totally implantable venous-access ports: challenges and perspectives.完全植入式静脉输液港相关感染的管理:挑战与展望。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2014 Feb;14(2):146-59. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70266-4. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
7
Totally implantable central venous catheters for chemotherapy: experience with 793 patients.用于化疗的完全植入式中心静脉导管:793例患者的经验
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2013 May-Jun;40(3):186-90. doi: 10.1590/s0100-69912013000300004.
8
Totally implantable venous access ports: retrospective review of long-term complications in 81 patients.完全植入式静脉通路端口:81例患者长期并发症的回顾性研究
Indian J Cancer. 2012 Jan-Mar;49(1):114-8. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.98934.
9
Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: a one-year prospective study in a cancer centre.完全植入式静脉输液港系统及其并发症的危险因素:癌症中心的一项为期一年的前瞻性研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;37(10):913-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
10
Outcome analysis in 3,160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems.3160 例经放射引导植入完全植入式中央静脉港系统的结果分析。
Eur Radiol. 2011 Jun;21(6):1224-32. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2045-7. Epub 2011 Jan 5.