Lee Eunhye, Lim Hyun Jeong, Son Ahjeong
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ewha Womans University 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu Seoul 03760 Republic of Korea
RSC Adv. 2025 Jun 11;15(25):19656-19664. doi: 10.1039/d5ra02689j. eCollection 2025 Jun 10.
The complexity and heterogeneity of soil samples necessitate the inclusion of extensive purification steps prior to genomic assays, such as quantitative PCR (qPCR). Although conventional DNA extraction kits have notably enhanced the convenience of the process, those designed for soil vary considerably in terms of reagents, time, and equipment. Therefore, purified gDNA quality varies depending on the DNA extraction kits used, which leads to discrepancies in gene quantification using qPCR. This issue can be amplified considerably when more complicated (or contaminated) soils are analyzed, even if extensive DNA extraction is employed. Here, we evaluated the influences of the DNA extraction method to the gene quantification using qPCR across soil types. Further Mg ion spiking experiments were performed to observe multiple inhibitory effects on qPCR analysis performance. The results suggest that discrepancies in gene quantification are evident in the presence of qPCR inhibitors in soil samples. Furthermore, discrepancies in quantification results are exacerbated by gDNA template quality, which is attributed to DNA extraction. The observed multiple inhibitory effects underscore the importance of careful consideration of both DNA template quality and soil type to ensure more accurate gene quantification in soils.
土壤样本的复杂性和异质性使得在进行基因组分析(如定量PCR,qPCR)之前需要进行大量的纯化步骤。尽管传统的DNA提取试剂盒显著提高了操作的便利性,但针对土壤设计的试剂盒在试剂、时间和设备方面差异很大。因此,纯化后的基因组DNA(gDNA)质量因所使用的DNA提取试剂盒而异,这导致使用qPCR进行基因定量时出现差异。当分析更复杂(或受污染)的土壤时,即使采用了广泛的DNA提取方法,这个问题也会显著放大。在这里,我们评估了DNA提取方法对不同土壤类型使用qPCR进行基因定量的影响。还进行了进一步的镁离子添加实验,以观察对qPCR分析性能的多种抑制作用。结果表明,土壤样本中存在qPCR抑制剂时,基因定量差异明显。此外,定量结果的差异因gDNA模板质量而加剧,这归因于DNA提取。观察到的多种抑制作用强调了仔细考虑DNA模板质量和土壤类型对于确保土壤中更准确的基因定量的重要性。