Taccola G, Steele A G, Apicella R, Oh J, Dietz V, Rajendran S, Barber S M, Faraji A H, Horner P J, Sayenko D G
Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America; Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neural Systems Restoration, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin Street, Houston, Texas 77030, United States of America; Neuroscience Department, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), via Bonomea, 265 - 34136 Trieste, Italy.
Center for Neuroregeneration, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX 77030, United States of America; Department of Neurosurgery, Center for Neural Systems Restoration, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6550 Fannin Street, Houston, Texas 77030, United States of America.
Exp Neurol. 2025 Jun 10;392:115347. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2025.115347.
Supraspinal influence on spinal networks remains incompletely understood yet is crucial for restoring motor function after neurological insults, including spinal cord injury or stroke. Neuromodulation interventions have been employed with varying success to aid recovery and can be utilized to investigate the relationship between supraspinal and spinal networks.
We elicited hindlimb muscle responses by motor cortex stimulation paired with either epidural or transcutaneous spinal stimulation in neurologically intact Long-Evans rats and Yucatan miniature pigs.
Our findings indicate that modulation of sensorimotor networks using the two stimulation modalities varies with the intensity of spinal stimulation. Specifically, spinal stimulation at near-motor-threshold levels modulates the magnitude of the weak descending volleys, with pronounced increases in compound motor evoked potential magnitude of up to 400-500 %. As spinal stimulation intensity increased, we observed a transition from modulated cortically evoked motor responses toward modulated spinally evoked motor responses. However, when the intensity of spinal stimulation exceeded the supra-motor-threshold, the conditioned responses were abolished. We also examined the effects of timing between paired cortical and spinal stimulation and found that the highest modulation occurred when delivering spinal stimulation using a latency approximately equal to the central conduction time of cortical stimulation.
The capacity of cortical stimulation to modulate the effects of spinal modulation can be described as a convergence of supraspinal and spinal networks on the motor pathway. Overall, our results suggest potential stimulation strategies that capitalize on supraspinal-spinal interactions without the need for targeting individual motor pools with focal spinal stimulation.
脊髓以上结构对脊髓网络的影响仍未完全明确,但对于包括脊髓损伤或中风在内的神经损伤后恢复运动功能至关重要。神经调节干预措施已被用于辅助恢复,且成功率各异,还可用于研究脊髓以上结构与脊髓网络之间的关系。
在神经功能正常的长 Evans 大鼠和尤卡坦小型猪中,我们通过运动皮层刺激并结合硬膜外或经皮脊髓刺激来诱发后肢肌肉反应。
我们的研究结果表明,使用这两种刺激方式对感觉运动网络的调节随脊髓刺激强度而变化。具体而言,接近运动阈值水平的脊髓刺激可调节微弱下行冲动的幅度,复合运动诱发电位幅度显著增加,增幅高达 400 - 500%。随着脊髓刺激强度增加,我们观察到从调节皮层诱发的运动反应向调节脊髓诱发的运动反应转变。然而,当脊髓刺激强度超过运动阈值时,条件反应消失。我们还研究了配对皮层和脊髓刺激之间的时间间隔效应,发现当脊髓刺激的潜伏期约等于皮层刺激的中枢传导时间时,调节效果最佳。
皮层刺激调节脊髓调节效应的能力可描述为脊髓以上结构和脊髓网络在运动通路上的汇聚。总体而言,我们的结果提示了一些潜在的刺激策略,这些策略利用脊髓以上结构与脊髓之间的相互作用,而无需通过局部脊髓刺激靶向单个运动神经元群。