Saeed Saher, Boriesosdick Jan, Michael Arwed, Haag Nina Pauline, Schreck Julian, Schoenbeck Denise, Woeltjen Matthias Michael, Niehoff Julius Henning, Moenninghoff Christoph, Borggrefe Jan, Kroeger Jan Robert
Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 2;15(11):1413. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15111413.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR)-guided periradicular nerve root injection therapy (PRT) using a 0.55 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system with fast dynamic imaging in a phantom. Five radiologists with varying levels of experience in PRT performed nine randomly assigned PRT procedures: three under MR guidance, three under CT guidance using a fully integrated laser navigation system, and three under conventional CT guidance, all on a specialized phantom of the lumbar spine. The PRTs were assessed by two experienced neuroradiologists with expertise in interventions, using a scale of 1-5, as follows: 5 = excellent to very good, 4 = good, 3 = satisfactory 2 = bad, 1 = very bad. The puncture time and total intervention time were noted. All procedures were technically successful. The subjective evaluation of the PRTs showed similar results with a median of 5 for all three guidance systems. Additionally, there was no significant difference with respect to pure puncture time (the period after needle path determination) among all PRTs (Mean ± SD): MR-guided 178 ± 117 s, CT-guided with laser system 186 ± 73 s, and the conventional CT-guided 218 ± 91 s ( = 0.482). However, the total procedure time including planning images was significantly higher for MR-guided PRT (700 ± 182 s) compared to CT guidance with laser system (366 ± 85 s) and conventional CT guidance (358 ± 150 s; = 0.012). Real-time MRI-guided lumbosacral periradicular injection therapy utilizing a 0.55 T MRI system is feasible with similar puncture times to CT guidance but consumes more intervention time due to the duration of planning sequences. Limitation: The study utilized a stationary phantom made of homogeneous material, which provides an incomplete representation of real tissue properties and motion complexity applied to human beings.
本研究的目的是在体模中使用具有快速动态成像功能的0.55 T磁共振成像(MRI)系统,评估磁共振(MR)引导下的神经根周围注射治疗(PRT)的准确性和可行性。五名在PRT方面经验水平各异的放射科医生进行了九次随机分配的PRT操作:三次在MR引导下进行,三次在使用完全集成激光导航系统的CT引导下进行,三次在传统CT引导下进行,所有操作均在腰椎的专用体模上进行。由两名在介入方面具有专业知识的经验丰富的神经放射科医生使用1-5级量表对PRT进行评估,具体如下:5 = 优秀至非常好,4 = 良好,3 = 满意,2 = 差,1 = 非常差。记录穿刺时间和总干预时间。所有操作在技术上均获成功。对PRT的主观评估显示,所有三种引导系统的结果相似,中位数均为5。此外,所有PRT的纯穿刺时间(确定针道后的时间段)无显著差异(均值±标准差):MR引导下为178 ± 117秒,激光系统CT引导下为186 ± 73秒,传统CT引导下为218 ± 91秒(P = 0.482)。然而,与激光系统CT引导(366 ± 85秒)和传统CT引导(358 ± 150秒;P = 0.012)相比,MR引导下PRT的包括规划图像在内的总操作时间显著更长(700 ± 182秒)。利用0.55 T MRI系统进行实时MRI引导的腰骶神经根周围注射治疗是可行的,穿刺时间与CT引导相似,但由于规划序列的持续时间,会消耗更多的干预时间。局限性:本研究使用的是由均质材料制成的固定体模,它不能完全代表应用于人体的真实组织特性和运动复杂性。