• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜子宫切除术中阴道和腹部子宫操作的比较分析:博兹托孙技术

Comparative Analysis of Vaginal and Abdominal Uterine Manipulation in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: The Boztosun Technique.

作者信息

Çelik İsmail, Boztosun Abdullah, Güner Fatma Ceren

机构信息

Department of Gynecology Obstetrics, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 May 23;14(11):3652. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113652.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14113652
PMID:40507414
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12156305/
Abstract

: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is commonly performed for benign gynecologic conditions, and the choice of uterine manipulation technique may influence surgical outcomes. The Boztosun technique, a modification of the classical Rein technique, enables intra-abdominal manipulation of the uterus without requiring transvaginal instruments. This study aimed to compare the Boztosun technique with a conventional vaginal uterine manipulator in terms of surgical efficiency and perioperative outcomes. : This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications at Akdeniz University Hospital between March 2022 and March 2024. Fifteen patients underwent surgery using the Boztosun technique, and fifteen with a vaginal uterine manipulator. Operative time, colpotomy time, manipulator placement time, hospital stay, uterine weight, hemoglobin change, and complications were compared. : The Boztosun technique was associated with significantly shorter operative time (81.67 ± 11.02 min vs. 109 ± 10.85 min, < 0.001), colpotomy time (4.13 ± 0.92 min vs. 8.87 ± 0.92 min, < 0.001), manipulator placement time (0.81 ± 0.27 min vs. 8.07 ± 1.22 min, < 0.001), and hospital stay (2.13 ± 0.35 days vs. 3.53 ± 0.92 days, < 0.001). No significant differences were found in uterine weight, hemoglobin decrease, or complication rates. All procedures were completed laparoscopically without conversion to open surgery. : The Boztosun technique may serve as a safe, efficient, and cost-effective alternative to vaginal uterine manipulators in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Its simplified intra-abdominal approach offers advantages in surgical workflow and recovery. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and assess their applicability in broader clinical settings.

摘要

腹腔镜子宫切除术常用于治疗良性妇科疾病,子宫操作技术的选择可能会影响手术效果。博兹托孙技术是对经典赖因技术的改良,可在无需经阴道器械的情况下在腹腔内操作子宫。本研究旨在比较博兹托孙技术与传统阴道子宫操纵器在手术效率和围手术期结果方面的差异。:这项回顾性研究纳入了2022年3月至2024年3月在阿克德尼兹大学医院因良性指征接受腹腔镜子宫切除术的30例患者。15例患者采用博兹托孙技术进行手术,15例使用阴道子宫操纵器。比较了手术时间、阴道切开时间、操纵器放置时间、住院时间、子宫重量、血红蛋白变化和并发症情况。:博兹托孙技术的手术时间(81.67±11.02分钟对109±10.85分钟,<0.001)、阴道切开时间(4.13±0.92分钟对8.87±0.92分钟,<0.001)、操纵器放置时间(0.81±0.27分钟对8.07±1.22分钟,<0.001)和住院时间(2.13±0.35天对3.53±0.92天,<0.001)明显更短。子宫重量、血红蛋白下降或并发症发生率方面未发现显著差异。所有手术均通过腹腔镜完成,未转为开放手术。:在腹腔镜子宫切除术中,博兹托孙技术可能是阴道子宫操纵器的一种安全、高效且经济有效的替代方法。其简化的腹腔内入路在手术流程和恢复方面具有优势。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现,并评估其在更广泛临床环境中的适用性。

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Vaginal and Abdominal Uterine Manipulation in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: The Boztosun Technique.腹腔镜子宫切除术中阴道和腹部子宫操作的比较分析:博兹托孙技术
J Clin Med. 2025 May 23;14(11):3652. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113652.
2
A new method used in laparoscopic hysterectomy for uterine manipulation: uterine rein technique.一种用于腹腔镜子宫切除术子宫操作的新方法:子宫复位技术。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;38(6):864-868. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1441273. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
3
Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术机器人子宫肌瘤剔除术。
Fertil Steril. 2022 Aug;118(2):414-416. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
4
Clermont-Ferrand versus Vectec uterine manipulator for total laparoscopic hysterectomy.用于全腹腔镜子宫切除术的克莱蒙费朗子宫操纵器与维克泰克子宫操纵器的比较
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2019 Feb;28(1):51-56. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2018.1471404. Epub 2018 May 15.
5
The McCarus-Volker ForniSee®: A Novel Trans-illuminating Colpotomy Device and Uterine Manipulator for Use in Conventional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.麦卡勒斯 - 福尔尼See®:一种用于传统及机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术的新型经阴道透光阴道切开术器械及子宫操纵器。
Surg Technol Int. 2017 Jul 25;30:191-196.
6
Comparing two Uterine Manipulators During Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.全腹腔镜子宫切除术中两种子宫操纵器的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jul-Aug;24(5):764-771. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.02.022. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
7
Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy with Enclosed Colpotomy and without the Use of Uterine Manipulator for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.腹腔镜下经闭孔阴道子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌 **解析**: - 原文中的“Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy”是指腹腔镜下根治性子宫切除术; - “with Enclosed Colpotomy”是指经闭孔阴道子宫切除术; - “and without the Use of Uterine Manipulator”是指不使用子宫操纵器; - “for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer”是指治疗早期宫颈癌。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Sep-Oct;26(6):1193-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 23.
8
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy without uterine manipulator. A retrospective study of 1023 cases.**标题**:无子宫操作器的全腹腔镜子宫切除术。1023 例回顾性研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Oct;253:254-258. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.035. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
9
Protective Maneuver to Avoid Tumor Spillage during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Vaginal Cuff Closure.腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术时避免肿瘤溢出的保护措施:阴道残端关闭。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Feb;28(2):174-175. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.06.007. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
10
The impact of obesity on vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy outcomes: A randomised control trial.肥胖对经阴道子宫切除术和腹腔镜辅助经阴道子宫切除术结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Aug;287:227-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
An age-period-cohort analysis of hysterectomy incidence trends in Germany from 2005 to 2019.2005 年至 2019 年德国子宫切除术发病率趋势的年龄-时期-队列分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 2;14(1):15110. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66019-8.
2
Optimizing Hysterectomy: A Prospective Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques and Their Impact on Women's Lives.优化子宫切除术:手术技术的前瞻性比较分析及其对女性生活的影响。
J Pers Med. 2024 Feb 29;14(3):265. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030265.
3
Intrauterine manipulator during hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes.
子宫内膜癌子宫切除术中的宫腔操作器:肿瘤学结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Feb;230(2):185-198.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.004. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
4
Nationwide trends in and regional factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications in Japan.日本全国范围内良性指征下微创子宫切除术的趋势及与地域相关的因素。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Oct;289:129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.08.388. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
5
Use of uterine manipulator and uterine perforation in minimally invasive endometrial cancer surgery.在微创子宫内膜癌手术中使用子宫操纵器和子宫穿孔。
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2023 Sep;52(7):102621. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102621. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
6
Impact of uterine manipulator on oncological outcome in endometrial cancer surgery.子宫操作器对子宫内膜癌手术中肿瘤学结果的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jan;224(1):65.e1-65.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
7
Uterine manipulator in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: safety and usefulness.腹腔镜全子宫切除术的子宫操纵器:安全性和有用性。
Updates Surg. 2020 Dec;72(4):1247-1254. doi: 10.1007/s13304-019-00681-w. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
8
Surgical Trends and Time Frame Comparison of Surgical Types of Hysterectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based 15-year Study.手术趋势和子宫切除术手术类型的时间框架比较:一项全国范围内基于人群的 15 年研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):65-73.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
9
A new method used in laparoscopic hysterectomy for uterine manipulation: uterine rein technique.一种用于腹腔镜子宫切除术子宫操作的新方法:子宫复位技术。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Aug;38(6):864-868. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1441273. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
10
Preoperative assessment of factors associated with difficulty in performing total laparoscopic hysterectomy.全腹腔镜子宫切除术操作困难相关因素的术前评估
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2017 Feb;43(2):320-329. doi: 10.1111/jog.13198.