• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用预防性甲基黄嘌呤预防出生体重为1250 - 2499克的早产儿拔管失败:一项倾向评分匹配分析。

Use of Prophylactic Methylxanthines to Prevent Extubation Failure in Preterm Neonates with a Birth Weight of 1250-2499 g: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

作者信息

Suwankomonkul Pachima, Thatrimontrichai Anucha, Pakhathirathien Pattima, Praditaukrit Manapat, Maneenil Gunlawadee, Dissaneevate Supaporn, Trangkhanon Chamaiporn, Phon-In Neeracha

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 May 30;14(11):3856. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113856.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14113856
PMID:40507622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12155656/
Abstract

Preterm neonates with a birth weight (BW) of 500-1250 g who receive prophylactic methylxanthine have a lower rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and neurodevelopmental disability than their counterparts. In a meta-analysis of previous studies (published during 1985-1993, with no routine continuous positive airway pressure), extubation failure rates in preterm neonates with BW < 2500 g who received and did not receive methylxanthine were 25.0% and 50.6%, respectively (risk difference, -0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.39 to -0.15). However, no study to date has assessed the effects of prophylactic methylxanthine use on endotracheal extubation in infants weighing 1250-2499 g until now. : First-time extubation was compared between 1:1 propensity score-matched methylxanthine and non-methylxanthine groups from a retrospective cohort of 541 neonates (born during 2014-2024). : The domains from the overall cohort and propensity-matched data included 541 and 192 neonates, respectively. In the propensity score-matched sample, the mean gestational age and BW were 30.9 ± 1.9 weeks and 1584 ± 273 g, respectively. The median 5-min Apgar score was 9 (range of 7-9). Extubation failure within 7 days occurred in 10 (10.4%) and 13 (13.5%) neonates in the methylxanthine ( = 96) and non-methylxanthine ( = 96) groups, respectively, with a risk difference (95% CI) of -0.03 (-0.12 to 0.06), = 0.50, and hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.76 (0.33 to 1.72), = 0.51. : In the current era with new non-invasive ventilation approaches, extubation failure in preterm neonates with a BW of 1250-2499 g is not significantly affected by the use of methylxanthine.

摘要

出生体重(BW)为500 - 1250克的早产新生儿接受预防性甲基黄嘌呤治疗后,与未接受该治疗的同龄人相比,支气管肺发育不良和神经发育残疾的发生率更低。在一项对先前研究(发表于1985 - 1993年,未常规使用持续气道正压通气)的荟萃分析中,出生体重<2500克且接受和未接受甲基黄嘌呤治疗的早产新生儿拔管失败率分别为25.0%和50.6%(风险差异,-0.27;95%置信区间[CI],-0.39至-0.15)。然而,迄今为止尚无研究评估预防性使用甲基黄嘌呤对体重1250 - 2499克婴儿气管插管拔管的影响。:从541例新生儿(2014 - 2024年出生)的回顾性队列中,对甲基黄嘌呤组和非甲基黄嘌呤组按1:1倾向评分匹配后比较首次拔管情况。:总体队列和倾向评分匹配数据的样本分别包括541例和192例新生儿。在倾向评分匹配样本中,平均胎龄和出生体重分别为30.9±1.9周和1584±273克。5分钟阿氏评分中位数为9(范围7 - 9)。甲基黄嘌呤组(n = 96)和非甲基黄嘌呤组(n = 96)分别有10例(10.4%)和13例(13.5%)新生儿在7天内出现拔管失败,风险差异(95%CI)为-0.03(-0.12至0.06),P = 0.50,风险比(95%CI)为0.76(0.33至1.72),P = 0.51。:在当前采用新型无创通气方法的时代,出生体重为1250 - 2499克的早产新生儿拔管失败不受甲基黄嘌呤使用的显著影响。

相似文献

1
Use of Prophylactic Methylxanthines to Prevent Extubation Failure in Preterm Neonates with a Birth Weight of 1250-2499 g: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.使用预防性甲基黄嘌呤预防出生体重为1250 - 2499克的早产儿拔管失败:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 30;14(11):3856. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113856.
2
Doxapram for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.多沙普仑预防和治疗早产儿呼吸暂停。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 25;10(10):CD014145. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014145.pub2.
3
Prophylactic methylxanthines for endotracheal extubation in preterm infants.预防性使用甲基黄嘌呤用于早产儿气管插管拔管
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;2010(12):CD000139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000139.pub2.
4
Prophylactic methylxanthine for extubation in preterm infants.预防性使用甲基黄嘌呤用于早产儿拔管
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000139.
5
Prophylactic methylxanthines for extubation in preterm infants.预防性使用甲基黄嘌呤用于早产儿拔管
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD000139. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000139.
6
Effectiveness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation as Support After Extubation of Neonates Born Extremely Preterm or With More Severe Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气与经鼻间歇正压通气与无创高频振荡通气在极早产儿或更严重呼吸衰竭拔管后支持中的效果比较:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2321644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21644.
7
Caffeine versus other methylxanthines for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.咖啡因与其他甲基黄嘌呤类药物在预防和治疗早产儿呼吸暂停中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 4;10(10):CD015462. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015462.pub2.
8
Methylxanthine for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.甲基黄嘌呤预防和治疗早产儿呼吸暂停。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 31;10(10):CD013830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013830.pub2.
9
Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Postextubation Support for Preterm Neonates in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.经鼻间歇正压通气与经鼻持续正压通气比较非侵入性高频振荡通气作为中国早产儿拔管后支持的随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jun 1;176(6):551-559. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0710.
10
Prophylactic doxapram for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants undergoing endotracheal extubation.预防性使用多沙普仑预防接受气管插管拔管的早产儿发病和死亡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(3):CD001966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001966.

引用本文的文献

1
Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes from a Matched Case-Control Study.极低出生体重儿的新生儿持续性肺动脉高压:一项配对病例对照研究的危险因素及临床结局
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 4;14(13):4759. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134759.

本文引用的文献

1
Predictors and Outcomes of Extubation Failure in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review.早产儿拔管失败的预测因素及结局:一项系统评价
Pediatrics. 2025 Feb 1;155(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2024-068677.
2
Noninvasive high-frequency oscillation ventilation as post- extubation respiratory support in neonates: Systematic review and meta-analysis.经鼻高频振荡通气作为新生儿拔管后呼吸支持的方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 30;19(7):e0307903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307903. eCollection 2024.
3
Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
经鼻高频振荡通气(NHFOV)与鼻塞持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)治疗早产儿的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2024 Jun 19;109(4):397-404. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325681.
4
Methylxanthine for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants.甲基黄嘌呤预防和治疗早产儿呼吸暂停。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 31;10(10):CD013830. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013830.pub2.
5
Predictors of extubation failure in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测新生儿拔管失败的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ital J Pediatr. 2023 Oct 2;49(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13052-023-01538-0.
6
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.经气管插管拔管后的早产儿使用经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 27;7(7):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub4.
7
Reintubation Rate between Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation versus Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Neonates: A Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial.经鼻高频振荡通气与同步经鼻间歇正压通气在新生儿中的再插管率比较:一项平行随机对照试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 Aug;41(11):1504-1511. doi: 10.1055/a-2118-5351. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
8
Carbon Dioxide Level between Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation after Extubation in Neonates: A Cross-over Randomized Controlled Trial.二氧化碳水平在新生儿拔管后经鼻高频振荡通气与同步经鼻间歇正压通气之间的比较:一项交叉随机对照试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 Aug;41(11):1495-1503. doi: 10.1055/a-2113-3284. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
9
A Nomogram for Predicting Extubation Failure in Preterm Infants with Gestational Age Less than 29 Weeks.预测胎龄小于 29 周的早产儿拔管失败的列线图
Neonatology. 2023;120(4):424-433. doi: 10.1159/000530759. Epub 2023 May 31.
10
Prediction of extubation failure among low birthweight neonates using machine learning.使用机器学习预测低出生体重儿的拔管失败。
J Perinatol. 2023 Feb;43(2):209-214. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01591-3. Epub 2023 Jan 7.