• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测新生儿拔管失败的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Predictors of extubation failure in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Qiaokou District, 1095 Jiefang Road, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.

School of Nursing, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

Ital J Pediatr. 2023 Oct 2;49(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13052-023-01538-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13052-023-01538-0
PMID:37784184
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10546653/
Abstract

Extubation failure (EF) is a significant concern in mechanically ventilated newborns, and predicting its occurrence is an ongoing area of research. To investigate the predictors of EF in newborns undergoing planned extubation, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies published in English from the inception of each database to March 2023. The PRISMA guidelines were followed in all phases of this systematic review. The Risk of Bias Assessment for Nonrandomized Studies tool was used to assess methodological quality. Thirty-four studies were included, 10 of which were overall low risk of bias, 15 of moderate risk of bias, and 9 of high risk of bias. The studies reported 43 possible predictors in six broad categories (intrinsic factors; maternal factors; diseases and adverse conditions of the newborn; treatment of the newborn; characteristics before and after extubation; and clinical scores and composite indicators). Through a qualitative synthesis of 43 predictors and a quantitative meta-analysis of 19 factors, we identified five definite factors, eight possible factors, and 22 unclear factors related to EF. Definite factors included gestational age, sepsis, pre-extubation pH, pre-extubation FiO, and respiratory severity score. Possible factors included age at extubation, anemia, inotropic use, mean airway pressure, pre-extubation PCO, mechanical ventilation duration, Apgar score, and spontaneous breathing trial. With only a few high-quality studies currently available, well-designed and more extensive prospective studies investigating the predictors affecting EF are still needed. In the future, it will be important to explore the possibility of combining multiple predictors or assessment tools to enhance the accuracy of predicting extubation outcomes in clinical practice.

摘要

拔管失败(EF)是机械通气新生儿的一个重要关注点,预测其发生是一个持续的研究领域。为了研究计划拔管的新生儿 EF 的预测因素,我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。在 PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了系统的文献检索,检索了从每个数据库建立到 2023 年 3 月发表的英文研究。本系统评价的所有阶段均遵循 PRISMA 指南。非随机研究风险评估工具用于评估方法学质量。共纳入 34 项研究,其中 10 项总体上为低偏倚风险,15 项为中度偏倚风险,9 项为高偏倚风险。这些研究报告了 6 个广泛类别中的 43 个可能的预测因素(内在因素;产妇因素;新生儿疾病和不良状况;新生儿治疗;拔管前后的特征;临床评分和综合指标)。通过对 43 个预测因素进行定性综合分析和对 19 个因素进行定量荟萃分析,我们确定了与 EF 相关的五个确定因素、八个可能因素和二十两个不确定因素。确定因素包括胎龄、败血症、拔管前 pH 值、拔管前 FiO 和呼吸严重程度评分。可能的因素包括拔管时的年龄、贫血、正性肌力药物的使用、平均气道压力、拔管前 PCO、机械通气持续时间、Apgar 评分和自主呼吸试验。由于目前只有少数高质量的研究,因此仍需要设计良好、更广泛的前瞻性研究来研究影响 EF 的预测因素。未来,探索将多个预测因素或评估工具相结合以提高预测临床实践中拔管结果的准确性将非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/b7e578198b2c/13052_2023_1538_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/5b4210103758/13052_2023_1538_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/9a81d9c154d0/13052_2023_1538_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/a5abcf189cad/13052_2023_1538_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/728b59f8af83/13052_2023_1538_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/f3b2ab250bce/13052_2023_1538_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/c7f645503f9f/13052_2023_1538_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/b7e578198b2c/13052_2023_1538_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/5b4210103758/13052_2023_1538_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/9a81d9c154d0/13052_2023_1538_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/a5abcf189cad/13052_2023_1538_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/728b59f8af83/13052_2023_1538_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/f3b2ab250bce/13052_2023_1538_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/c7f645503f9f/13052_2023_1538_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bae/10546653/b7e578198b2c/13052_2023_1538_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predictors of extubation failure in newborns: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测新生儿拔管失败的因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ital J Pediatr. 2023 Oct 2;49(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13052-023-01538-0.
2
Cough augmentation techniques for extubation or weaning critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation.用于机械通气的危重症患者拔管或撤机的咳嗽增强技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 11;1(1):CD011833. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011833.pub2.
3
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.拔管后早产儿使用鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)与鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub3.
4
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
5
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.经鼻持续气道正压通气在早产儿中的应用:预防发病率和死亡率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):CD012778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012778.pub2.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Higher versus lower fractions of inspired oxygen or targets of arterial oxygenation for adults admitted to the intensive care unit.对于入住重症监护病房的成年人,较高与较低吸氧分数或动脉血氧目标。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 13;9(9):CD012631. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012631.pub3.
8
Interventions for the management of transient tachypnoea of the newborn - an overview of systematic reviews.干预措施管理新生儿暂时性呼吸急促 - 系统评价概述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 24;2(2):CD013563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013563.pub2.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Prophylactic doxapram for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants undergoing endotracheal extubation.预防性使用多沙普仑预防接受气管插管拔管的早产儿发病和死亡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(3):CD001966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001966.

引用本文的文献

1
Environmental factors contribute to the success of extubation in newborns: A multicenter cross-sectional study.环境因素有助于新生儿拔管成功:一项多中心横断面研究。
Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 Aug 12;29(6):101255. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101255.
2
Risk factors and adverse outcomes of extubation failure in preterm infants ≤32 weeks with neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.孕周≤32周且患有新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿拔管失败的危险因素及不良结局
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jul 10;13:1555521. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1555521. eCollection 2025.
3
A nomogram to predict extubation failure in infants born before 32 gestational weeks: a single-center retrospective study.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors and clinical outcomes of extubation failure in very early preterm infants: a single-center cohort study.极早早产儿拔管失败的危险因素及临床结局:一项单中心队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Jan 21;23(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-03833-5.
2
Opportunity for invasive mechanical ventilation in NRDS: a retrospective cohort study in China.新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征有创机械通气的时机:一项中国的回顾性队列研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;36(1):2165061. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2165061.
3
Analysis of predictive parameters for extubation in very low birth weight preterm infants.
预测孕32周前出生婴儿拔管失败的列线图:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Transl Pediatr. 2025 May 30;14(5):776-787. doi: 10.21037/tp-2025-43. Epub 2025 May 27.
4
Use of Prophylactic Methylxanthines to Prevent Extubation Failure in Preterm Neonates with a Birth Weight of 1250-2499 g: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.使用预防性甲基黄嘌呤预防出生体重为1250 - 2499克的早产儿拔管失败:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 30;14(11):3856. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113856.
5
Invasive Ventilation Strategies in Neonates.新生儿有创通气策略
Indian Pediatr. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s13312-025-00094-6.
6
Prognostic factors for successful extubation in newborns with congenital diaphragmatic hernia.先天性膈疝新生儿成功拔管的预后因素
Front Pediatr. 2025 Jan 27;13:1530467. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1530467. eCollection 2025.
7
Predicting extubation failure in neonates: The role of lung ultrasound and corrected gestational age in safe weaning in the NICU.预测新生儿拔管失败:肺部超声和矫正胎龄在新生儿重症监护病房安全撤机中的作用。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 17;184(2):144. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-05977-1.
极低出生体重早产儿拔管预测参数分析。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2023 May;64(3):274-279. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
4
Weaning and extubation from neonatal mechanical ventilation: an evidenced-based review.新生儿机械通气的撤机和拔管:基于证据的综述。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):421. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02223-4.
5
Accuracy of lung and diaphragm ultrasound in predicting successful extubation in extremely preterm infants: A prospective observational study.肺和膈肌超声预测极早产儿拔管成功的准确性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 Feb;58(2):530-539. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26223. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
6
Predictors of extubation success: a population-based study of neonates below a gestational age of 26 weeks.预测拔管成功的因素:一项基于人群的研究,研究对象为胎龄低于 26 周的新生儿。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Aug;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2022-001542.
7
The physiological underpinnings of life-saving respiratory support.拯救生命的呼吸支持的生理基础。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Oct;48(10):1274-1286. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06749-3. Epub 2022 Jun 12.
8
Risk Factors of Extubation Failure in Intubated Preterm Infants at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Oman.阿曼一家三级护理医院中,插管早产儿拔管失败的风险因素。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2022 May;22(2):247-252. doi: 10.18295/squmj.8.2021.122. Epub 2022 May 26.
9
Predictors of extubation outcomes among extremely and very preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study.极早产儿和超早产儿拔管结局的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022 Nov-Dec;98(6):648-654. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.04.001. Epub 2022 May 28.
10
Diaphragmatic electromyography during a spontaneous breathing trial to predict extubation failure in preterm infants.自主呼吸试验中膈肌肌电图预测早产儿拔管失败。
Pediatr Res. 2022 Oct;92(4):1064-1069. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02085-w. Epub 2022 May 6.