Kim Dae-Geun, Park Eugene J, Min Woo-Kie, Kim Sang-Bum, Lee Gaeun, Choi Sung
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Gumi 39568, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Dream General Hospital, Daegu 702-752, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Med. 2025 May 30;14(11):3878. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113878.
: Biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS) is one of the minimally invasive spine surgery techniques. BESS has several advantages, such as better visualization, less muscle injury, early rehabilitation, etc. Due to its clear visualization, delicate intraoperative hemostasis of the bleeding foci, including cancellous bone and small epidural vessels, can be achieved. Therefore, some authors have reported that BESS resulted in less intraoperative visible blood loss (VBL) compared to conventional open surgery. However, it is difficult to analyze the exact amount of intraoperative blood loss because of the continuous normal saline irrigation. In addition, hidden blood loss (HBL) tends to be overlooked, and the amount of HBL might be larger than expected. We aim to calculate the amount of HBL during BESS and to compare our findings with convention open surgery. : We retrospectively obtained the clinical data of patients that underwent lumbar central decompression from July 2021 to June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: the BESS group that underwent biportal endoscopic lumbar decompression, and the open surgery group that underwent open decompression. Both groups used unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression techniques. Total blood loss (TBL) using preoperative and postoperative change in hematocrit (Hct) was measured using Gross's formula and the Nadler equation. Since TBL consists of VBL and HBL, HBL was calculated by subtracting the VBL measured intraoperatively from TBL. : A total of sixty-six patients in the BESS group and seventeen patients in the open surgery group were included in the study. The TBL was 247.16 ± 346.88 mL in the BESS group and 298.71 ± 256.65 mL in the open surgery group, without significant difference (p = 0.569). The calculated HBL values were 149.44 ± 344.08 mL in the BESS group and 171.42 ± 243.93 mL in the open surgery group. The HBL in the BESS group was lower than the HBL in the open surgery group, without significant difference ( = 0.764). : The TBL and HBL during lumbar central decompression were smaller in patients who underwent BESS compared to those who underwent open surgery. While TBL was significantly lower in BESS, HBL did not show statistical significance between the two groups. HBL during BESS should not be neglected, and related hemodynamics should be considered postoperatively.
双门内镜脊柱手术(BESS)是微创脊柱手术技术之一。BESS具有诸多优势,如视野更好、肌肉损伤更小、康复更早等。由于其视野清晰,术中能够对包括松质骨和小硬膜外血管在内的出血灶进行精细止血。因此,一些作者报告称,与传统开放手术相比,BESS术中可见失血量(VBL)更少。然而,由于持续用生理盐水冲洗,很难分析术中确切的失血量。此外,隐匿性失血(HBL)往往被忽视,且HBL的量可能比预期的要大。我们旨在计算BESS术中的HBL量,并将我们的研究结果与传统开放手术进行比较。
我们回顾性获取了2021年7月至2024年6月期间接受腰椎中央减压手术患者的临床数据。患者分为两组:接受双门内镜腰椎减压的BESS组和接受开放减压的开放手术组。两组均采用单侧椎板切开术和双侧减压技术。使用Gross公式和Nadler方程,根据术前和术后血细胞比容(Hct)的变化来测量总失血量(TBL)。由于TBL由VBL和HBL组成,通过从TBL中减去术中测量的VBL来计算HBL。
本研究共纳入BESS组66例患者和开放手术组17例患者。BESS组的TBL为247.16±346.88 mL,开放手术组为298.71±256.65 mL,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.569)。计算得出的BESS组HBL值为149.44±344.08 mL,开放手术组为171.42±243.93 mL。BESS组的HBL低于开放手术组,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.764)。
与接受开放手术的患者相比,接受BESS的患者在腰椎中央减压术中的TBL和HBL更少。虽然BESS组的TBL显著更低,但两组之间的HBL没有统计学差异。BESS术中的HBL不应被忽视,术后应考虑相关的血流动力学情况。