Suppr超能文献

单节段经皮与单侧双通道内镜下经椎间孔腰椎间融合术患者的总失血量和隐性失血量比较:一项回顾性病例对照研究。

Comparison of the total and hidden blood loss in patients undergoing single-level open and unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective case control study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No.1055 Sanxiang Road, Gusu District, Suzhou, 215004, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 14;24(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06393-y.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare total blood loss (TBL) and hidden blood loss (HBL) in patients undergoing single-level open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (O-TLIF) and unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF).

METHODS

A total of 53 patients who underwent ULIF and 53 patients who underwent O-TLIF from March 2020 to July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The Nadler's formula was employed to estimate the patient's blood volume (PBV), Gross's formula to estimate TBL, and Sehat's formula to estimate HBL. The obtained data were then analyzed with independent t test, chi-squared test, and analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

TBL and measured blood loss (MBL) in ULIF group (326.86 ± 223.45 ml, 99.00 ± 72.81 ml) was significantly lower than O-TLIF group (427.97 ± 280.52 ml, 270.66 ± 102.34 ml). Nevertheless, the HBL in ULIF group was higher than that in O-TLIF group (227.86 ± 221.75 ml vs 157.31 ± 268.08 ml), however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.143). The HBL was 69.71 ± 23.72% of TBL in ULIF group and 36.76 ± 18.79% of TBL in O-TLIF group. Patients in ULIF group had lower TBL and MBL, shorter duration of drainage, lower postoperative anemia, and shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to those in O-TLIF group.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative HBL should not be neglected in patients undergoing ULIF or O-TILF, as it accounts for a large percentage of TBL in both groups. ULIF is associated with lower TBL and MBL, postoperative anemia, shorter postoperative hospital stays compared with O-TLIF.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较单节段经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(ULIF)和单侧双通道内镜经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(O-TLIF)患者的总失血量(TBL)和隐性失血量(HBL)。

方法

回顾性分析 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 7 月间行 ULIF 和 O-TLIF 的 53 例患者。采用 Nadler 公式估计患者血容量(PBV),Gross 公式估计 TBL,Sehat 公式估计 HBL。采用独立 t 检验、卡方检验和协方差分析对所得数据进行分析。

结果

ULIF 组的 TBL 和测量失血量(MBL)(326.86±223.45ml,99.00±72.81ml)明显低于 O-TLIF 组(427.97±280.52ml,270.66±102.34ml)。然而,ULIF 组的 HBL 高于 O-TLIF 组(227.86±221.75ml 比 157.31±268.08ml),但差异无统计学意义(p=0.143)。ULIF 组 HBL 占 TBL 的 69.71±23.72%,O-TLIF 组 HBL 占 TBL 的 36.76±18.79%。与 O-TLIF 组相比,ULIF 组患者的 TBL 和 MBL 更低、引流时间更短、术后贫血程度更低、术后住院时间更短。

结论

ULIF 和 O-TILF 患者均应重视围手术期的 HBL,因其占两组 TBL 的很大比例。与 O-TLIF 相比,ULIF 具有更低的 TBL 和 MBL、术后贫血和较短的术后住院时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3a7/10103431/8c6ac91c6182/12891_2023_6393_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验