Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, No.1055 Sanxiang Road, Gusu District, Suzhou, 215004, Jiangsu, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 14;24(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06393-y.
This study aimed to compare total blood loss (TBL) and hidden blood loss (HBL) in patients undergoing single-level open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (O-TLIF) and unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF).
A total of 53 patients who underwent ULIF and 53 patients who underwent O-TLIF from March 2020 to July 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The Nadler's formula was employed to estimate the patient's blood volume (PBV), Gross's formula to estimate TBL, and Sehat's formula to estimate HBL. The obtained data were then analyzed with independent t test, chi-squared test, and analysis of covariance.
TBL and measured blood loss (MBL) in ULIF group (326.86 ± 223.45 ml, 99.00 ± 72.81 ml) was significantly lower than O-TLIF group (427.97 ± 280.52 ml, 270.66 ± 102.34 ml). Nevertheless, the HBL in ULIF group was higher than that in O-TLIF group (227.86 ± 221.75 ml vs 157.31 ± 268.08 ml), however this was not statistically significant (p = 0.143). The HBL was 69.71 ± 23.72% of TBL in ULIF group and 36.76 ± 18.79% of TBL in O-TLIF group. Patients in ULIF group had lower TBL and MBL, shorter duration of drainage, lower postoperative anemia, and shorter postoperative hospital stay compared to those in O-TLIF group.
Perioperative HBL should not be neglected in patients undergoing ULIF or O-TILF, as it accounts for a large percentage of TBL in both groups. ULIF is associated with lower TBL and MBL, postoperative anemia, shorter postoperative hospital stays compared with O-TLIF.
本研究旨在比较单节段经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(ULIF)和单侧双通道内镜经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(O-TLIF)患者的总失血量(TBL)和隐性失血量(HBL)。
回顾性分析 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 7 月间行 ULIF 和 O-TLIF 的 53 例患者。采用 Nadler 公式估计患者血容量(PBV),Gross 公式估计 TBL,Sehat 公式估计 HBL。采用独立 t 检验、卡方检验和协方差分析对所得数据进行分析。
ULIF 组的 TBL 和测量失血量(MBL)(326.86±223.45ml,99.00±72.81ml)明显低于 O-TLIF 组(427.97±280.52ml,270.66±102.34ml)。然而,ULIF 组的 HBL 高于 O-TLIF 组(227.86±221.75ml 比 157.31±268.08ml),但差异无统计学意义(p=0.143)。ULIF 组 HBL 占 TBL 的 69.71±23.72%,O-TLIF 组 HBL 占 TBL 的 36.76±18.79%。与 O-TLIF 组相比,ULIF 组患者的 TBL 和 MBL 更低、引流时间更短、术后贫血程度更低、术后住院时间更短。
ULIF 和 O-TILF 患者均应重视围手术期的 HBL,因其占两组 TBL 的很大比例。与 O-TLIF 相比,ULIF 具有更低的 TBL 和 MBL、术后贫血和较短的术后住院时间。